Remember that Asian weave shop owner that punched the black woman in Tulsa?

HarlemHottie

Uptown Thoroughbred
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
18,004
Reputation
11,260
Daps
75,358
Reppin
#ADOS
It's cool.

I get what you're saying.

And no I'm not one of those "red pill" dudes. Women actually like me. Those nikkas are hilariously pathetic tho.:mjlol:
I'll be honest with you. I'm a woman who knows game. I know when I'm being gamed, it's fun to me, I enjoy men in all their fukkery. So when I encountered red pill, I was actually glad that somebody had taken the time to write down the shyt I already knew. I advise women to go read up on it. It's like listening to someone who knows you well describe you. You be like, 'Huh, I didn't realize I did that.' Or, 'Huh, I knew I was doing that, just not why.' Or, 'Huh, I know bytches that do that...'

'Red pill dudes' are usually still hurt. I get it. But some are using the info to improve marriages, of which I approve. All knowledge can be mis-used.
 

BlaqkSpliffin

Ni**as Still Weird - Me
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
5,324
Reputation
2,069
Daps
27,375
Reppin
DMV
I'll be honest with you. I'm a woman who knows game. I know when I'm being gamed, it's fun to me, I enjoy men in all their fukkery. So when I encountered red pill, I was actually glad that somebody had taken the time to write down the shyt I already knew. I advise women to go read up on it. It's like listening to someone who knows you well describe you. You be like, 'Huh, I didn't realize I did that.' Or, 'Huh, I knew I was doing that, just not why.' Or, 'Huh, I know bytches that do that...'

'Red pill dudes' are usually still hurt. I get it. But some are using the info to improve marriages, of which I approve. All knowledge can be mis-used.

I mean I guess:pachaha:

I find alot of what those dudes say to be either super basic shyt or the ramblings of hurt nikkas who can't get women and are now lashing out. In some ways they're similar to feminist. There's merit to some of the things they say but I question the intent and usage of their whole ideology.
I've spent the majority of my life around women in one for or another so I understand them pretty well and have never really needed any insight into how to deal with them or reconcile with who I am as a man. I understand game even though I don't like playing that shyt.

Not everybody's like me tho so I guess I can see the need for nikkas like AMS and those red pill dudes. To each their own.:manny:
 

Asicz

Presume the unpredictable
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
14,021
Reputation
-5,290
Daps
33,061
Unpopular opinion but I THINK THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THOSE WOMEN DID.

1. Black people need to understand the limits of consumer boycott like these especially in modern times. Just like the NFL boycott of watching they still gonna get there MONEY regardless.
Y'all can't sink a companies ship by no boycott. It hasn't worked in a long time. This ain't the 1960s.

2. Black males have the convenience of getting ALL there hair care needs met with out dealing with Asians.

IF y'all nikkas barbers had repeated incidents of assault on customers in the same way alot of y'all would still be getting your haircut you have to for social and employment reasons.

3.Black men showing up is insufficient. Black men have not been able to compete in any part of black female hair care products industry on a dominant level.
The Asians control manufacturing and distribution, and every pary of the weave products industry and have access to more capital
A race that doesnt control manufacturing will be subordinated to the other race.

Also the gesture of 50% off can help a low income black woman's financial state temporarily, low income black women are in no position to turn down 50 %off on ANYTHING, FOOD, COSMETIC ETC. A little means a lot.

Black men don't have any alternative stores to compete with the Asians so that they can purchase weave.

Also WEAVE IS A NECESSITY. Black women with coarse short hair in the workplace,court room and dating arena are typically at disadvantage. These are the harsh realities.
Also protective styles like weave help black women's hair.
 
Last edited:

HarlemHottie

Uptown Thoroughbred
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
18,004
Reputation
11,260
Daps
75,358
Reppin
#ADOS
Unpopular opinion but I THINK THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THOSE WOMEN DID.

1. Black people need to understand the limits of consumer boycott like these especially in modern times. Just like the NFL boycott of watching they still gonna get there MONEY regardless.
Y'all high as can't sink a companies ship by no boycott. It hasn't worked in a looking time. This ain't the 1960s.

2. Black males have the convenience of getting ALL there hair care needs met with out dealing with Asians.

IF y'all nikkas barbers had repeated incidents of assault in customers in the same way alot of y'all would still be getting your haircut you have to for social and employment reasons.

3.Black men showing up is insufficient. Black men have not been able to compete in any part of black female hair care products industry on a dominant level.
The Asians control manufacturing and distribution, and every pary of the weave products industry and have access to more capital
A race that doesnt control manufacturing will be subordinated to the other race.

Also the gesture of 50% off can help a low income black woman's financial state temporarily, low income black women are in no position to turn down 50 %off on ANYTHING FOOD, COSMETIC ETC. A little means a lot.

Black men don't have any alternative stores to compete with the Asians so that they can purchase weave.

Also WEAVE IS A NECESSITY. Black women with coarse short hair in the workplace,court room and dating arena are typically at disadvantage. These are the harsh reality.
Also protective styles like weave help black women's hair.

:salute: :lawd:


Dap + rep!
 

KOohbt

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,454
Reputation
2,185
Daps
49,532
Reppin
NULL
This is the average black womans behavior. This is to be expected. But the shaming shows we are trending in the right direction.
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
44,128
Reputation
3,788
Daps
129,222
Unpopular opinion but I THINK THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THOSE WOMEN DID.

1. Black people need to understand the limits of consumer boycott like these especially in modern times. Just like the NFL boycott of watching they still gonna get there MONEY regardless.
Y'all can't sink a companies ship by no boycott. It hasn't worked in a long time. This ain't the 1960s.

2. Black males have the convenience of getting ALL there hair care needs met with out dealing with Asians.

IF y'all nikkas barbers had repeated incidents of assault on customers in the same way alot of y'all would still be getting your haircut you have to for social and employment reasons.

3.Black men showing up is insufficient. Black men have not been able to compete in any part of black female hair care products industry on a dominant level.
The Asians control manufacturing and distribution, and every pary of the weave products industry and have access to more capital
A race that doesnt control manufacturing will be subordinated to the other race.

Also the gesture of 50% off can help a low income black woman's financial state temporarily, low income black women are in no position to turn down 50 %off on ANYTHING, FOOD, COSMETIC ETC. A little means a lot.

Black men don't have any alternative stores to compete with the Asians so that they can purchase weave.

Also WEAVE IS A NECESSITY. Black women with coarse short hair in the workplace,court room and dating arena are typically at disadvantage. These are the harsh realities.
Also protective styles like weave help black women's hair.

It is not. It is actually considered discrimination, the same as forcing a Sikh to remove his turban.
Black women use that as a convenience to keep wearing weave..we are not stupid.
Most Black women running major corporations all rock natural hair, just look at the Black women on the Fortune 500 companies list. So the idea that Black women are forced to wear weave is a fukking lie. Just admit you love weave and hate your ow God given hair.
And if companies expect Black women to wear weave, they should purchase it for them as it is like a uniform.
 

www.THUG.com

Trick Love Da Kids!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
3,942
Reputation
1,475
Daps
16,514
Reppin
D.C.
What is the purpose of a boycott? To hurt whatever you boycotting financially enough to make change. The Montgomery bus boycott worked because black people were the ones who rode the bus the most and it hurt them financially. The bus line depended on black people for money. The NFL does NOT depend on black male viewers. Boycotting the NFL does NOT hurt billionaire owners like Jerry Jones, Stan Keonke or Paul Allen. Black men compromise what, 10 percent of total viewership??

Meanwhile black women single handedily make the Koreans rich and they refuse to boycott the store where they DEPEND for black women money when they slapped up one of their own. If bw boycotted Korean owned businesses, then they WILL FAULTER. But instead of boycotting and going to the black-owned store down the street, the Asian man’s ice is colder and will give him the money after he slapped up and abused them. Bu bu bu blsck men and the NFL!!

Make whatever excuse you want but all you're saying is that you're not built for this :francis:
 

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,939
Reputation
5,706
Daps
234,996
Unpopular opinion but I THINK THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THOSE WOMEN DID.

1. Black people need to understand the limits of consumer boycott like these especially in modern times. Just like the NFL boycott of watching they still gonna get there MONEY regardless.
Y'all can't sink a companies ship by no boycott. It hasn't worked in a long time. This ain't the 1960s.

2. Black males have the convenience of getting ALL there hair care needs met with out dealing with Asians.

IF y'all nikkas barbers had repeated incidents of assault on customers in the same way alot of y'all would still be getting your haircut you have to for social and employment reasons.

3.Black men showing up is insufficient. Black men have not been able to compete in any part of black female hair care products industry on a dominant level.
The Asians control manufacturing and distribution, and every pary of the weave products industry and have access to more capital
A race that doesnt control manufacturing will be subordinated to the other race.

Also the gesture of 50% off can help a low income black woman's financial state temporarily, low income black women are in no position to turn down 50 %off on ANYTHING, FOOD, COSMETIC ETC. A little means a lot.

Black men don't have any alternative stores to compete with the Asians so that they can purchase weave.

Also WEAVE IS A NECESSITY. Black women with coarse short hair in the workplace,court room and dating arena are typically at disadvantage. These are the harsh realities.
Also protective styles like weave help black women's hair.
:camby:
 

GreenGhxst

Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2016
Messages
26,452
Reputation
4,541
Daps
91,086
Reppin
Tangibles
Unpopular opinion but I THINK THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THOSE WOMEN DID.

1. Black people need to understand the limits of consumer boycott like these especially in modern times. Just like the NFL boycott of watching they still gonna get there MONEY regardless.
Y'all can't sink a companies ship by no boycott. It hasn't worked in a long time. This ain't the 1960s.

2. Black males have the convenience of getting ALL there hair care needs met with out dealing with Asians.

IF y'all nikkas barbers had repeated incidents of assault on customers in the same way alot of y'all would still be getting your haircut you have to for social and employment reasons.

3.Black men showing up is insufficient. Black men have not been able to compete in any part of black female hair care products industry on a dominant level.
The Asians control manufacturing and distribution, and every pary of the weave products industry and have access to more capital
A race that doesnt control manufacturing will be subordinated to the other race.

Also the gesture of 50% off can help a low income black woman's financial state temporarily, low income black women are in no position to turn down 50 %off on ANYTHING, FOOD, COSMETIC ETC. A little means a lot.

Black men don't have any alternative stores to compete with the Asians so that they can purchase weave.

Also WEAVE IS A NECESSITY. Black women with coarse short hair in the workplace,court room and dating arena are typically at disadvantage. These are the harsh realities.
Also protective styles like weave help black women's hair.

complacency is a problem, need solutions not excuses
 

Asicz

Presume the unpredictable
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
14,021
Reputation
-5,290
Daps
33,061
It is not. It is actually considered discrimination, the same as forcing a Sikh to remove his turban.
Black women use that as a convenience to keep wearing weave..we are not stupid.
Most Black women running major corporations all rock natural hair, just look at the Black women on the Fortune 500 companies list. So the idea that Black women are forced to wear weave is a fukking lie. Just admit you love weave and hate your ow God given hair.
And if companies expect Black women to wear weave, they should purchase it for them as it is like a uniform.
:duck: ON STEROIDS. YOU ARE BEING SILLY NOW. AND LOW KEY OFFENDED I HAVE A NOTIFICATION FOR THIS NONSENSE YOU REPLIED WITH BECUASE YOU WASTING MY TIME.

8 Black Women Talk About Being Discriminated Against for Having Natural Hair
 

Asicz

Presume the unpredictable
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
14,021
Reputation
-5,290
Daps
33,061
complacency is a problem, need solutions not excuses
Solutions is not trying to shame these black women for buying from that store.
Not effective as was seen.

Solution =organized black political education organizatio. And action so that black men don't have other racial groups selling haircare product to their women in the first place.
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,234
Reputation
-2,348
Daps
17,128
Solutions is not trying to shame these black women for buying from that store.

It is a solution. If a foreigner is in your neighborhood mistreating your people, then stop patronizing the business. In fact, black people shouldnt even let foreigners set up shop in their neighborhoods period. You think chinatown would let a black man set up shop in their area and patronize his business? And then when he openly disrespects their women, allow him to remain? Continue doing business with him?

This doesnt only apply to women as there have been incidents with arabs and corner stores as well to which the community continued patronizing the business afterwards.

Solution =organized black political education organizatio. And action so that black men don't have other racial groups selling haircare product to their women in the first place.

That is a solution and a good one at that. But at the end of the day your idea that weave is a necessity is false and a copout for women that really dont like what they see when they look in the mirror.
 

Nicole0416_718_929_646212

The Prim Reaper
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
69,608
Reputation
25,931
Daps
200,983
Reppin
NYC and FBA Riverboat Retaliation
It is not. It is actually considered discrimination, the same as forcing a Sikh to remove his turban.
Black women use that as a convenience to keep wearing weave..we are not stupid.
Most Black women running major corporations all rock natural hair, just look at the Black women on the Fortune 500 companies list. So the idea that Black women are forced to wear weave is a fukking lie. Just admit you love weave and hate your ow God given hair.
And if companies expect Black women to wear weave, they should purchase it for them as it is like a uniform.
No they dont. This is the Dumbest answer that I've seen on this.. your whole explanantion just ignorant and dumb af. Every single point. I'm dumb for even responding to it. Dafuq are you comparing a head of hair to a turban? I've worked and interacted at agencies, corporations, law firms... they wear very conservative wigs or weaves- a good majority. Mainly a bob, some type of updo or a bun. Some are forced to wear weave bc of hair damage or equivalent, or thinning hair issue; that's their individual and private/personal choice.. you cant judge if you're not a woman.

But no, I don't agree with those women lining up over after another black woman was abused there. It's pathetic and shows no code- i'm disgused and appalled bc the lack of solidarity/code over a weave sale is disappointing af. There's a number of black owned online sites.
 
Last edited:
Top