Dushane Hill
Superstar
Anyone feel it would have just made more sense to release the games in chronological order instead of doing the prequel thing?
Anyone feel it would have just made more sense to release the games in chronological order instead of doing the prequel thing?
...i don't think they planned this game before or during red dead redemption. i think they were caught off by how well received the first one was and now knew we all wanted to know what led up to john being left for dead by his old gang leader.
Anyone feel it would have just made more sense to release the games in chronological order instead of doing the prequel thing?
Your post kind of doesnt make any sense
Since RDR was set in the end days of cowboys and Gunslingers, so it was right for this game to back in time for the series (and story purposes )
also Rockstar has done this GTA all the time.
GTA 3 - 01
VC - 86
SA - 92
But 3 was released before SA, yet we see Claude in SA foreshadowing the events prior to him meeting Catalina.
Off topic but SF does this too.
Game series that do this seem to last longer and opens more windows in connecting stories.
Who knows, Bully 2 might be set before the first one.
I meant as in RDR2 should have come out first then have RDR1 come out now.
Anyone think the game kinda looks like Mafia 3?
No. I'm interested to know how you came to that though
Arthur dying in this, cause i don't remember John going after him in the first one
So, are they really not making this game enhanced for the X1X?
I guess I’ll just have to get the Pro version then.
But, the X1X is more powerful. They wouldn’t purposely neglect the X1X would they?
where did you hear that?So, are they really not making this game enhanced for the X1X?
I guess I’ll just have to get the Pro version then.
But, the X1X is more powerful. They wouldn’t purposely neglect the X1X would they?