Real talk: Batman 1989 is not a good movie

SleezyBigSlim

Banned
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
19,886
Reputation
-1,515
Daps
52,890
I'm sorry brehs, the movie was a little bit wack. It was carried by the costume design and you know it.

Movie was forgettable. Nothing really remarkable about it. The story beats felt weak, character motivations were all over the place, etc. Along with other stupid stuff (joke killing Batman's parents... Vicki Vale...)

Prince's soundtrack didn't add anything to the movie. I left it thinking "what was the point of this?"

Overall, Tim Burtons designs and scene composition are the only things about it that actually stick out for being somewhat good. Otherwise, it was ass.
@humminbird
I agree, my 9 yr old self thought Michael Keaton was the the best Batman, by the time I was in 8th grade I was taller and probably weighed more then that p*ssy with my skinny ass. Lost all respect for Michael Keaton batman when I realized my 8th grade self could beat him up:scust:
 

humminbird

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
44,668
Reputation
8,679
Daps
184,178
Just depends on a persons age, they may say it sucked ..... early 20's and early 30's cats will say it sucked ass

if you late 30's and early 40's talking this batman-1989 is ass cheeks :pacspit: lol
Every bbq i have this fight with my uncle he’s like 49 and loves it
We have drunk debates about this all the time
 

jackswstd

Retired
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,905
Reputation
8,890
Daps
264,821
Reppin
Chicago
After the campiness of Batman ‘66, Burton’s Batman gave him back his dignity. Joker being responsible for his parents death was a weak point, but other than that Keaton was a near perfect Batman. You can say his Bruce Wayne was weak, but his portrayal of Batman shyts all over Bale.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,493
Reputation
1,955
Daps
55,273
Reppin
Toledo, OH
I don't agree with the thread but I think Batman Forever has aged better. I love the campiness of it.

And it looks glorious on bluray :wow:
 
Top