I don't think you just take any shot just because, but you should definitely prioritize the most efficient shots.Ehh I get it but I still believe getting your team in possession to make baskets >>>taking the 3 just because . Specifically for the bolded
Not only is the midrange the least efficient shot, but it also shrinks the space. If the Clippers are prioritizing the midrange, it means it'll lead to fewer easy scoring opportunities. Folks keep talking about it's easy to score in the paint in today's league, and that's because there are fewer defenders in and around the paint, as they're out on the perimeter and/or covering more ground to account for 3-pt shooting. What do you think happens when defenses don't have to account for that same degree of 3-pt shooting? They're going to be closer to the paint and closer to providing help defense.
The further you stretch a defense, the easier it is to score; the less you stretch a defense, the harder it is to score.
P.J. Tucker spoke about this a couple of years ago. He said it was a whole lot easier for him to provide help defense when the midrange was in vogue, as he'd only need to take a couple of strides and he'd be at the next man, but defending the 3-pt shot is an entirely different beast, it means he has to cover twice the amount of ground just to be in a position to provide that same help defense.
Basically, 3-pt shooting is a cheat code to more efficient shots everywhere else.