Rockets fans.You're catching feelings over someone being exposed for using analytics in a misleading and inprecise way but we're sensitive?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb54/7bb540241d40025eb9ea1d2d48bc54f1002d4f56" alt="russ :russ: :russ:"
Rockets fans.You're catching feelings over someone being exposed for using analytics in a misleading and inprecise way but we're sensitive?
Think of it in these terms, if you take 52 shots and make every one of those 52 you'll end up with 104 points. If he makes the 35 like he has that'll lead to 105 points. Efficiency isn't what's best for one play but over time if you do the same action which will produce better results.Aint it kinda misleading though. The efficiency is pure math, it doesn't account for game situation.
If Warriors are down 1 with no time left, shooting a 100% guaranteed 2-pt shot is more efficient than shooting 67% 3-pt shot from 28-50 feet out.
Unless I'm not getting it.![]()
You guys are so fukking sensitive. :smhkobe:
He's not implying that Curry should shoot nothing but half court shots. Why does this actually have to be explained? :smhkobe:
Stop posting.He's implying that Steph Curry is so good at shooting 3 that he could be more efficient than a guy shooting 2's even if that guy made all his 2's...which is fukking stupid...because after a certain number he wouldn't be...:yeahok:
Oh my bad...your not mad about that...your mad cause you posted some dumb ass steph curry analytical twitter BS and you thought it was going to get you a bunch of daps but instead you had posters tell you how stupid such a post was...probably because you yourself don't even know how to interpret the numbers :yeahok:
My bad breh...tell you what the next time you post some foolishness like this i well just ignore it...scouts honor :grippingafrancis:
You anti-Curry motherfukkers are hilarious. He's the least hateable star in a long time.
What part of Europe is he from?His game is an absolute joy to watch too.
What part of Europe is he from?