Random NBA Observations 2015 - 2016

DetroitEWarren

Veteran
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
19,915
Reputation
7,500
Daps
64,504
Reppin
Detroit You bytch Ass nikka
im thinking harden or butler if those teams blow it up. Id even part ways with wiggings.:ehh: tired of losing. I prefer butler
I think Paul George would be perfect if they would move Wiggins for him. fukk Harden, and Butler has the same flaws as Wiggins. They should shop Wiggins and see if IND would bite on George n/h
 

ThaGlow

All Star
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
4,148
Reputation
120
Daps
6,800
Probably been posted already but this was my first time seeing it. :damn:


Aint it kinda misleading though. The efficiency is pure math, it doesn't account for game situation.

If Warriors are down 1 with no time left, shooting a 100% guaranteed 2-pt shot is more efficient than shooting 67% 3-pt shot from 28-50 feet out.

Unless I'm not getting it.:jbhmm:
 

Lord Beasley

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
43,919
Reputation
2,774
Daps
83,683
Reppin
469 x 972 x 702
Aint it kinda misleading though. The efficiency is pure math, it doesn't account for game situation.

If Warriors are down 1 with no time left, shooting a 100% guaranteed 2-pt shot is more efficient than shooting 67% 3-pt shot from 28-50 feet out.

Unless I'm not getting it.:jbhmm:
Advanced stats are ruining the way we watch games:francis:
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,051
Reputation
10,252
Daps
217,335
Aint it kinda misleading though. The efficiency is pure math, it doesn't account for game situation.

If Warriors are down 1 with no time left, shooting a 100% guaranteed 2-pt shot is more efficient than shooting 67% 3-pt shot from 28-50 feet out.

Unless I'm not getting it.:jbhmm:
You're not getting it. :kobewhatever:
 

Osmar

Superstar
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
3,591
Reputation
654
Daps
14,900
Reppin
NULL
Aint it kinda misleading though. The efficiency is pure math, it doesn't account for game situation.

If Warriors are down 1 with no time left, shooting a 100% guaranteed 2-pt shot is more efficient than shooting 67% 3-pt shot from 28-50 feet out.

Unless I'm not getting it.:jbhmm:

I understand what your saying, but technically he is right because 3 point shots are weighted more when calculating "efficient field goal" percentage

eFG% = (FGM + (0.5 x 3PTM)) / FGA

(35 + (0.5 x 35))/52 = 1.009 about 101%
 

duckbutta

eienaar van mans
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,309
Reputation
10,410
Daps
150,997
Reppin
DFW
Probably been posted already but this was my first time seeing it. :damn:



This is why "analytics" can be :stopitslime:

I wonder how much math he did to find a distance range + a number of shots to actually get to that 52 number...which is almost the perfect efficiency number for the number of makes...
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,051
Reputation
10,252
Daps
217,335
This is why "analytics" can be :stopitslime:

I wonder how much math he did to find a distance range + a number of shots to actually get to that 52 number...which is almost the perfect efficiency number for the number of makes...


You guys are so fukking sensitive. :smhkobe:

He's not implying that Curry should shoot nothing but half court shots. Why does this actually have to be explained? :smhkobe:
 

Tha Gawd Amen

Mamba Mentality
Supporter
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
8,465
Reputation
3,280
Daps
28,544
Reppin
#ByrdGang
People in here really getting in their feelings over a statement that solely shows how great of a shooter Steph is :dwillhuh:
 

inndaskKy

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
11,923
Reputation
2,715
Daps
42,837
Reppin
NULL
You guys are so fukking sensitive. :smhkobe:

He's not implying that Curry should shoot nothing but half court shots. Why does this actually have to be explained? :smhkobe:

You're catching feelings over someone being exposed for using analytics in a misleading and inprecise way but we're sensitive?
 
Top