![russ :russ: :russ:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sabu.png)
I have to say, I HATE this era of soundbites and clickbait.......all Charles is looking to do is create views and it works. Meanwhile, we're all bombarded with trash commentary...
Charles Barkley said:Turrible.....
Charles Barkley said:Turrible.....
Yah he shot that FG% as a garbage man, which he should be labeled as. I'm not here to say DJ is better than Drummond, but to suck his dikk because he puts up 5 more ppg while shooting below 50% TS which is trash for a fukking center( and ANY player). That's horrble and embarrassing.Breh, Drummond shot 62% his second year in the league with a far worse team around him, and a PG who isn't even half of what CP3 is. The reason his FG% is where it's at now is because they're running offense through him. I mean seriously, 77% of DeAndre's shots are assisted and 51% of Drummonds are and you're talking to me about context?
That's what the individual 3pt FG% is for, not everything needs to be turned into an all encompassing stat. I even think the name "True shooting" is ridiculous too.
Who said anything about efficiency, we're talking about FG% and now you want to talk efficiency as though there aren't stats for that as well. And yeah, Drummond has been more efficient than everyone you named outside of![]()
Yah he shot that FG% as a garbage man, which he should be labeled as. I'm not here to say DJ is better than Drummond, but to suck his dikk because he puts up 5 more ppg while shooting below 50% TS which is trash for a fukking center( and ANY player). That's horrble and embarrassing.
How you gonna ask a question and answer it yourself, then throw out one of your own answers?Real talk when was the last time a center shooting below 50% TS was accepted into the All Star game(Ben Wallace doesn't count because he is one of the best defensive anchors in NBA history). Wow, Jermaine Oneal did it once and almost a 2nd time.
I don't need one stat for that when I can just look at all threeIndividual 3pt% is there to tell you what he shoots from 3, nothing more. There is a difference in how many 3s or FTs people make, TS% captures this and 2pt% all in one stat.
Why is IT2 more efficient than than Wall? IT2 has a lower FG% and 3PT%.
IT2: 22ppg, .423% FG, .347% 3PT
Wall: 20ppg, .428% FG, .350% 3PT
Malta: "Wall is more efficient than IT2, FTs and the amount of attempts from 3 don't even matter. 3 points is not more than 2. FTs don't count as a possession."
Bruh, FG% is a part of efficiency.
That last line is killing me
Drummond 17ppg on .496% TS
Wall
20ppg on .517% TS
IT2
21.5ppg on .560% TS
Westbrook
24ppg on .555% TS
Read what D Wade said in the descriptionreal shyt
![]()
Harden's also on pace to break the record for most turnovers in a season too. For what it's worth.