Rand Paul Filibusters Brenen Nomination Over Drones

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,317
Reputation
6,840
Daps
90,816
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
not that i want drones in my backyard. but seeing as though this is 2013. and we dont have old school wars like we use to. where you only had to check for a hand full of spies and fight the big armies. the war you face now is a war of terrorist. its like spies with an agenda to destroy things in your home country.

i'm asking a real question. if some person decides to become some kind of extremist and has plans to blow up something significant. which will harm lots and lots of people. should a drone be out of the question as far tools at the disposal of the feds, local police, etc to try and catch the guy before he does it?

DO NOT change my hypothetical to fit your agenda. i need answers to my question before we go any further.

can this have a snowball effect? of course. they called black panthers communists and used that as an excuse to infiltrate them legally. i just want an answer to my hypo-question.

Should be an absolute last resort. I.e we would have to pull some of our finest from overseas to take care of the situation.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
Should be an absolute last resort. I.e we would have to pull some of our finest from overseas to take care of the situation.

i agree with you. but you also are admitting to it being a POSSIBILITY. which is what holder stated and people got all up in arms about it.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
Paul is opposed to the use of military drones to kill americans on american soil. I agree with him. As far as searching for criminals, I'm not opposed to that. It happened with Dorner if I remember right.



Even in your tailor made scenario, I'm not sure weaponized drones would be the best option (I think a long range sniper would be best, because the drone would probably shoot the bomb). If he's held up in an area (he's behind a door right? If not what are the feds knocking on?), we could reach a safe distance and wait him out.

But even this misses the point. Paul does not want the rights of an Amercian to due process eroded. And neither do I. He doesn't want Amercans shot in coffee shops on American soil by drones the way, say, Afghan Taliban members might be in their country- even though they may not pose a threat at the moment.
but who does? thats my point. no one is going to agree with letting drones fly around shooting americans just in case they MIGHT think about hating america.

no one will ever agree to that. no one being citizens. the problem is, if we agree to use them on super extreme situations. there will always be a possible snowball effect that COULD take place. it may never happen. but it COULD happen.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,317
Reputation
6,840
Daps
90,816
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
i agree with you. but you also are admitting to it being a POSSIBILITY. which is what holder stated and people got all up in arms about it.

No I say its improbable a situation will ever arise that would make sense for the use of a drone. Ain't nobody taking over the Black Hills and hiding in caves.

Holder is saying its a possibility. Which insinuates that its already been calculated and mapped out.

So the question begs, "Under what situation is this a possibility. what scenario (geography and social demography included) requires the usage of a drone?"

Domestic terrorism? All he can do publicly is describe the character profile of the target. That's nowhere near an argument for "possibility."
 

DLo

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
3,299
Reputation
495
Daps
10,071
I need to brush up on my congressional procedures but how long can he talk for? Will they recess for the night and let him pick up again tomorrow?

He just name dropped all the dictators we supported. :ohlawd:
 

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,319
Reputation
3,285
Daps
30,744
There's no need to change your hypothetical. It's already dystopian. There are already plans to mechanize policing... if you don't think that drones will be patrolling the skies above the projects, I don't know what to tell you.
It will be interesting to see how crime, organized and 'disorganized' reacts. Maybe things will go way back to the old days with people doing shyt in person, staying off monitored communication, coded messages and shyt.

:ehh:
 

Consigliere

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
10,541
Reputation
1,836
Daps
37,047
Im watching this live. Paul is gonna end up with no friends at the end of this. He's throwing all kinds of dirt on both parties.

popcorn_yes.gif
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,599
Reputation
4,858
Daps
68,473
I wouldn't call being anti-drone strikes as being a progressive issue like some others have said. I don't think progressives have ownership over that (though obviously they were in opposition to waterboarding and tactics of that sort and are still pushing for the Obama administration to release the full documents about what the Bush administration did). But I definitely think that what Rand Paul did is necessary, not because I think this is anything more than political posturing before what is an inevitable confirmation, but because it didn't allow Congress to just straight up abjure their responsibilities like they did back in 2003 and 2004. In the end, even the people that gave him food had voted for it in the committee so it looks lame that they're now trying to leap onto a popular political moment.

I guess I've fallen out of love with political theatre. But what's worse is how everyone seems to forget how part of the problem is the cowardice of the American people, part of the reason places like Guantanomo weren't closed and why terrorists weren't given due process on US soil was every Senator, Governor, Mayor and their cities being like :whoa: not in our state. Which of course led to Obama firing the advisor who told him that we'd be able to close Guantanomo within in a year and part of this situation we're in now. So while we all cheer shyt like this, remember it was our own cowardice and preference for having accused terrorists (including American ones) being dealt with in a place that violates all sorts of due process rights than in front of our eyes as part of the problem.

Maybe, that's why the public doesn't care about drones, it's being consistent with it's :manny: as long as it's not near me :whoa:. This is a much bigger issue on the internet than it is everyday on the street.
 

Consigliere

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
10,541
Reputation
1,836
Daps
37,047
Americans have abdicated their responsibility to hold their politicians accountable and it carried over into the current procedural mess we have today. Leading to the threat of the filibuster stop votes from going forward, knowing that most Senators/ Congressmen don't have the intestinal fortitude to follow through.

We all know this won't stop the bill from going forward.

20 years from now when we're living in Minority Report with pre-crime and drones listening to your conversations at least we can all look back and see who had the courage of their convictions to actually stand up and try to head off the coming privacy crisis.

And if we're lucky this draws enough attention to the use of drones to that we get more discussion about due process and privacy rights.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
It will be interesting to see how crime, organized and 'disorganized' reacts. Maybe things will go way back to the old days with people doing shyt in person, staying off monitored communication, coded messages and shyt.

:ehh:

It depends on how the tech develops... I honestly think that's the main battlefield. Remember that Taliban forced and Iraqi insurgents were hacking our drones with $30 software. I also doubt fully militarized drones will be deployed here. Military surveillance and control technology always makes its way back home into civilian contexts, though, in one form or another.
 
Top