Its pointless. @marcuz seriously thinks skin color means more than it does
Some of these guys don't even has passports.
The USA's view of "race is VERY unique" when you leave the border
i bet my passport has more stamps than yours
and yeah, the US upholds the one drop rule. outside of the USA, they don't classify biracials as black just because they have one black parent. so thanks for proving my point
did you forget the bet?
you bet me that OG eobard thawne wont be making an appearance in season 2 
Brasil
white 47.7%,
mulatto (mixed white and black) 43.1%,
black 7.6%,
Asian 1.1%,
indigenous 0.4% (2010 est.)
At least they waking up and realizing they're more that 50% of the country.
Post blue-black people and claim they aren't black because they originate from Asia, brehs.race is real in how it affects our lives and how people perceive it. however, its not real in an absolute sense. for example, there is absolutely no genetic marker for race. there are genetic markers for affinity in terms of genetic relation. and in many cases that coincides with phenotypical similarity. however, that isn't always the case.
the best example will always be the Admanese Islanders. They are a small seculded tribe of people who live in a chain of islands off the coast of the India. Genetically they are most closesly related to asians. particularly those on the indian subcontinent. but in terms of phenotype they look Africa. or more exactly, very close to the black african phenotype.
so are these people black? in terms of phenotype they definitely look black. and if you put them in modern american clothes and put them in the streets of NYC, they would get treated black. HOWEVER, genetically they are about as far from africans as you can get and they are geneticaly most closesly related to asians.
this is why we call race a social construct. there is no scientific basis for it. as humans we just use it as a shorthand to assign closeness in relation. it works most times. but like all non-scientific methods, its not foolproof. its simply another short-hand form of human behavior. just like all other forms of discrimination.
I didn't skip shyt I clearly used your definition and exposed the contradiction. On what planet does a child not share the legacy of it's parents? If you've got a parent who's a descendant of slavery then you're a descendant of slavery whether you're talking 2015 or 1915. Saying that biracials share no legacy of slavery is a blatant lie. Again, your personal definition of black is inconsistent and nonsensical.
No fukk you ad hominem deflections. The point that u was making is clear. Of course there's a lot of self hating ass c00ns who would jump ship given the first opportunity. That goes without saying. This is why it's important not to in-fight with blacks who do embrace their blackness even if they're mixed with other shyt.
and this is basically what nikkas want over here. a large race of mulattoes, except they all identify as black
So black people with a mixed grand parent or great grandparent due to slavery AREN'T BLACK NOW
Yall gone learn about @marcuz and his ideology. He trying to turn this bytch into Brazil, Angola or Dominican Republic for Blacks in America
who cares? that doesn't stop them self hating mutts from constantly procreating with whites, trying to breed out their blackness. i dont want blacks in the US to share their fate. i dont want to be a group of conflicted half-whites, because we refuse to centralize blackness around black people.
why are all you muthafukkas responding for other people?
