PR is basically the 51st state already, divorce rates damn near identicalDivorce rates from around the world -
# 1 United States: 4.95 per 1,000 people
# 2 Puerto Rico: 4.47 per 1,000 people
# 3 Russia: 3.36 per 1,000 people
# 4 United Kingdom: 3.08 per 1,000 people
# 5 Denmark: 2.81 per 1,000 people
# 6 New Zealand: 2.63 per 1,000 people
# 7 Australia: 2.52 per 1,000 people
# 8 Canada: 2.46 per 1,000 people
# 9 Finland: 1.85 per 1,000 people
# 10 Barbados: 1.21 per 1,000 people
# 11 Guadeloupe: 1.18 per 1,000 people
# 12 Qatar: 0.97 per 1,000 people
# 13 Portugal: 0.88 per 1,000 people
# 14 Albania: 0.83 per 1,000 people
# 15 Tunisia: 0.82 per 1,000 people
# 16 Singapore: 0.8 per 1,000 people
# 17 China: 0.79 per 1,000 people
# 18 Greece: 0.76 per 1,000 people
# 19 Brunei: 0.72 per 1,000 people
# 20 Panama: 0.68 per 1,000 people
# 21 Syria: 0.65 per 1,000 people
# 22 Thailand: 0.58 per 1,000 people
# 23 Mauritius: 0.47 per 1,000 people
# 24 Ecuador: 0.42 per 1,000 people
# 25 El Salvador: 0.41 per 1,000 people
# 26 Cyprus: 0.39 per 1,000 people
= 27 Jamaica: 0.38 per 1,000 people
= 27 Chile: 0.38 per 1,000 people
= 29 Mongolia: 0.37 per 1,000 people
= 29 Turkey: 0.37 per 1,000 people
# 31 Mexico: 0.33 per 1,000 people
# 32 Italy: 0.27 per 1,000 people
# 33 Brazil: 0.26 per 1,000 people
# 34 Sri Lanka: 0.15 per 1,000 people
Weighted average: 1.3 per 1,000 people
Essential Quick Lil Gems on Dealing with Women
- Thread starter Rominati
- Start date
Notice it's mostly westernized countries with strong feminism where divorce is dominating the rankings.
That's why I'm not down with liberalism at all... They ACT like they are down with black people, but they pretty much use the black struggle to promote all kinds of garbage, ESPECIALLY this neofeminist trash. You try to argue against the stuff they talk about and it ALWAYS comes back to some, "Well the blacks were discriminated against and you don't like that do you? So why do you not want to give women their rights." As if what modern women are going through is in any fashion similar to creating a privileged society for women.
What's funny is that the REAL misogynists are these neo-feminists. THEY hate women. They are so ashamed of being a woman that they attempt to emulate men.
here is more of that suckerism Harvey is kicking
Pretty much," Ladies, we worship you. We do everything for you. You have the ultimate power over us." Just a bunch of simpism, and you wonder why men are so confused in this day and age, because they are taught to worship vagina through all these different media sources.
Pretty much," Ladies, we worship you. We do everything for you. You have the ultimate power over us." Just a bunch of simpism, and you wonder why men are so confused in this day and age, because they are taught to worship vagina through all these different media sources.
So that chart displaying divorce rates doesn't surprise me one bit that the United States is easily #1 , but what I am so surprised by is the weighed average of it all.
One of my co-workers just got through a divorce and a couple of months ago during the thick of the whole process the conversation about marriage and divorce popped up. I have strong opinions about the whole thing, but my co-worker and I didn't know we were about to be given a science class in which only being told be a foreigner can make one go cringe at how obvious it looks from those who move to this country from overseas.
My co-worker from Italy blurted out immediately "I would never marry American Woman" and we both looked like...
It was not about attraction, its about logic he said. Without compromise by either party a relationship is almost never going to work especially with the feminist movement going on in this country. What makes things worse is the archaic system we have set up in which protects women AND the interests of the United States. See men are still the major bread winners in this country so a divorce threatens the buying power of a woman...who are generally more materialistic than men are. He doesn't understand the feminist movement because it will start causing more problems in where THEY might have to start paying out alimony if complete equality is reached.
Filing for divorce and going through the entire process is BIG money for an x amount of years if you have children with the woman. See Alimony is simply not enough because the support you are giving a woman is to maintain a lifestyle in which she expects to have lived with you, combine that with the fact that you must now also pay child support is just icing on the cake up to the age of 23 I believe if the kid goes to college. You can cry that you lost your job, you lost out on an investment...you can cry whatever you want - the decision was made to get married which is a contract to the female that you will support her to the best of your abilities and since women are generally more materialistic than men are it gives a bit more security to the overall economy of this country as spending the money she does not work for is easy. The slickest part of it all? Dude's soon to be wife and her attorney were trying to get him on the grounds that he has a masters degree in chemistry and should try to base the payment support on that fact (He was only making $10 an hour at the time)...I was literally
when I heard that.
Now most of that is obvious to the guys who are in their mid 20's and early 30's in this country, but the simple fact that it was someone overseas who clearly saw through all the BS and hoops we have to go through these days is truly a sign that things need to change. Its advanced math for those who don't want to pay attention, it's big business when you get divorced...just think of the LAYERS that actually benefit off the fact that you are getting divorced....even the PROCESS of getting divorced is big money for those involved.
I have recently talked about how people and their money is being rationed out to everyone else...this is just another step. With automatic payments being accepted by everyone the whole country continues to run like a machine without skipping a beat.
Oh and btw since you also fought for visitation rights you look like an a$$hole if you don't treat your son/daughter to a great time with the limited time you now have...thus making the pressure to spend even more money on wants much more significant.
Be careful my brehs, its real out there.
One of my co-workers just got through a divorce and a couple of months ago during the thick of the whole process the conversation about marriage and divorce popped up. I have strong opinions about the whole thing, but my co-worker and I didn't know we were about to be given a science class in which only being told be a foreigner can make one go cringe at how obvious it looks from those who move to this country from overseas.
My co-worker from Italy blurted out immediately "I would never marry American Woman" and we both looked like...
It was not about attraction, its about logic he said. Without compromise by either party a relationship is almost never going to work especially with the feminist movement going on in this country. What makes things worse is the archaic system we have set up in which protects women AND the interests of the United States. See men are still the major bread winners in this country so a divorce threatens the buying power of a woman...who are generally more materialistic than men are. He doesn't understand the feminist movement because it will start causing more problems in where THEY might have to start paying out alimony if complete equality is reached.
Filing for divorce and going through the entire process is BIG money for an x amount of years if you have children with the woman. See Alimony is simply not enough because the support you are giving a woman is to maintain a lifestyle in which she expects to have lived with you, combine that with the fact that you must now also pay child support is just icing on the cake up to the age of 23 I believe if the kid goes to college. You can cry that you lost your job, you lost out on an investment...you can cry whatever you want - the decision was made to get married which is a contract to the female that you will support her to the best of your abilities and since women are generally more materialistic than men are it gives a bit more security to the overall economy of this country as spending the money she does not work for is easy. The slickest part of it all? Dude's soon to be wife and her attorney were trying to get him on the grounds that he has a masters degree in chemistry and should try to base the payment support on that fact (He was only making $10 an hour at the time)...I was literally
when I heard that.Now most of that is obvious to the guys who are in their mid 20's and early 30's in this country, but the simple fact that it was someone overseas who clearly saw through all the BS and hoops we have to go through these days is truly a sign that things need to change. Its advanced math for those who don't want to pay attention, it's big business when you get divorced...just think of the LAYERS that actually benefit off the fact that you are getting divorced....even the PROCESS of getting divorced is big money for those involved.
I have recently talked about how people and their money is being rationed out to everyone else...this is just another step. With automatic payments being accepted by everyone the whole country continues to run like a machine without skipping a beat.
Oh and btw since you also fought for visitation rights you look like an a$$hole if you don't treat your son/daughter to a great time with the limited time you now have...thus making the pressure to spend even more money on wants much more significant.
Be careful my brehs, its real out there.
Italy has one of the lowest rates in the world.
Yeah, I'm not down with that ish at all, I don't even understand why they are pressing so hard for it when it's clearly not working. It's basically destined to fail, and yet women seem fine with the idea of being single mothers.
This new feminist movement is being pushed to destabilize the family. Gloria Steinem, one of the prominent modern feminists was actually a CIA agent. What does the CIA do? They go to various countries and destabilize it through various political movements. When that's not found to work, then they come in with the military force. They are destabilizing this country so it can be rebuilt with some other agenda in mine.
All of this was tested on the black community first. At one point, blacks actually had one of the lowest rates of illegitimacy... but in comes welfare policies that encourage single mother homes. In comes those neo feminist policies that tout how 'strong and independent' these single mothers are and how they don't need a man. I can go on and on. And what did you see? You see outrageous illegitimacy rates and a black population that is fairly easy to control. They perfected it on the black population and now they are taking it nationwide.
In regards to the Italian guy talking about American women, I've heard similar stories. Foreign guys were discouraged by their family from dealing with an American woman. I believe you will hear it a lot from indian men. NOBODY wants masculinized men, but women are buying into that garbage so easily, it's not even funny. I mean, think of even the Steve Harvey book. It's not saying, "Think like a woman and be a woman." It's saying ACT like a lady, but really think like a man.
This is what the Bible says:
Proverbs 23:7
New King James Version (NKJV)
7 For as he thinks in his heart, so is he.
“Eat and drink!” he says to you,
But his heart is not with you.
In other words, you ARE what you think. Steve Harvey tells women to THINK like men, and thus they will become masculine. He doesn't even tell them to BE ladies, he tells them to ACT like ladies. That's a key word that people don't pick up on. On the inside, the thoughts of a woman should be masculine, but on the outside, she should ACT, or in other words, outwardly portray a veneer of being a lady. This is the brainwashing that people in this country are dealing with.
On the other hand, men are brainwashed with FEMININE game. They are taught to be nurturing, emotionally revealing, caring, submissive, etc. Those are feminine traits. What is one thing that men typically say when they see themselves as the decent man and got dumped? "I was there for her, I listened to her, I supported her, I helped her get back on her feet." In other words, he played the role of the submissive supporter. Men have been subtlely brainwashed to be women and women are being brainwashed to be men.
What a lot of people don't know is that many of the people in power are masonic/hold new age beliefs. You just have to look on the back of the one dollar bill to see that. Here is one objective of these adherents of 'hidden knowledge':
In other words, they are told to make society androgynous. They are told to make women into men and men into women, and thus create an androgynous society. Why do you think you hear so much about 'destroying the gender roles'?
And as we see, it is in full effect and working. The androgynous who were reared with no clearly defined principles or roles are MUCH easier to control. Is it not easier to write on a piece of parchment with no writing on it than overwrite one that is full of writing? There is a very powerful machine in the background interested in flipping the gender roles on its head, which is why you see it so strongly promoted everywhere in the media.
All of this was tested on the black community first. At one point, blacks actually had one of the lowest rates of illegitimacy... but in comes welfare policies that encourage single mother homes. In comes those neo feminist policies that tout how 'strong and independent' these single mothers are and how they don't need a man. I can go on and on. And what did you see? You see outrageous illegitimacy rates and a black population that is fairly easy to control. They perfected it on the black population and now they are taking it nationwide.
In regards to the Italian guy talking about American women, I've heard similar stories. Foreign guys were discouraged by their family from dealing with an American woman. I believe you will hear it a lot from indian men. NOBODY wants masculinized men, but women are buying into that garbage so easily, it's not even funny. I mean, think of even the Steve Harvey book. It's not saying, "Think like a woman and be a woman." It's saying ACT like a lady, but really think like a man.
This is what the Bible says:
Proverbs 23:7
New King James Version (NKJV)
7 For as he thinks in his heart, so is he.
“Eat and drink!” he says to you,
But his heart is not with you.
In other words, you ARE what you think. Steve Harvey tells women to THINK like men, and thus they will become masculine. He doesn't even tell them to BE ladies, he tells them to ACT like ladies. That's a key word that people don't pick up on. On the inside, the thoughts of a woman should be masculine, but on the outside, she should ACT, or in other words, outwardly portray a veneer of being a lady. This is the brainwashing that people in this country are dealing with.
On the other hand, men are brainwashed with FEMININE game. They are taught to be nurturing, emotionally revealing, caring, submissive, etc. Those are feminine traits. What is one thing that men typically say when they see themselves as the decent man and got dumped? "I was there for her, I listened to her, I supported her, I helped her get back on her feet." In other words, he played the role of the submissive supporter. Men have been subtlely brainwashed to be women and women are being brainwashed to be men.
What a lot of people don't know is that many of the people in power are masonic/hold new age beliefs. You just have to look on the back of the one dollar bill to see that. Here is one objective of these adherents of 'hidden knowledge':
In other words, they are told to make society androgynous. They are told to make women into men and men into women, and thus create an androgynous society. Why do you think you hear so much about 'destroying the gender roles'?
And as we see, it is in full effect and working. The androgynous who were reared with no clearly defined principles or roles are MUCH easier to control. Is it not easier to write on a piece of parchment with no writing on it than overwrite one that is full of writing? There is a very powerful machine in the background interested in flipping the gender roles on its head, which is why you see it so strongly promoted everywhere in the media.
Just to reaffirm what I said... who is the most controlled population in society? Prisoners.
Where do 70% to 80% of federal inmates come from? That's right, single motherhood households. Destabilizing the family structure and eliminating the father from the picture allows the elites to exert a much greater level of control on the country. Instead of daddy coming in and distributing values and principles, the government takes that role. Instead of dad being the hunter who goes out and procures the resources to ensure his family is taken care of, here comes big daddy government stepping in to 'provide the resources'.
Now this is EXTREMELY dangerous. Whenever you have a populace that depends on the government for subsistence, the government then wields an enormous amount of control over that populace. This is why when this country was created, there was a SEPARATION of government powers. When any ruling branch garners too much control, terrible things happen, for as they say, power corrupts. When the woman, who isn't built to be the hunter, depends on the government for resources, does not the government have the ability to control her? If she doesn't get in line, she faces starvation.
Allowing the media and government to trivialize and eliminate the man will have devastating effects on society as we are already seeing. This is why it is so important for men to become men again and to educate females on why they should NOT shun their God-given feminine nature.
Where do 70% to 80% of federal inmates come from? That's right, single motherhood households. Destabilizing the family structure and eliminating the father from the picture allows the elites to exert a much greater level of control on the country. Instead of daddy coming in and distributing values and principles, the government takes that role. Instead of dad being the hunter who goes out and procures the resources to ensure his family is taken care of, here comes big daddy government stepping in to 'provide the resources'.
Now this is EXTREMELY dangerous. Whenever you have a populace that depends on the government for subsistence, the government then wields an enormous amount of control over that populace. This is why when this country was created, there was a SEPARATION of government powers. When any ruling branch garners too much control, terrible things happen, for as they say, power corrupts. When the woman, who isn't built to be the hunter, depends on the government for resources, does not the government have the ability to control her? If she doesn't get in line, she faces starvation.
Allowing the media and government to trivialize and eliminate the man will have devastating effects on society as we are already seeing. This is why it is so important for men to become men again and to educate females on why they should NOT shun their God-given feminine nature.
That is why I hate simps and feminists so much.
"Bobby Sherrill, a Lockheed employee in Kuwait from North Carolina, was captured by Iraqis and spent nearly five months as an Iraqi hostage. Sherrill was arrested the night after his release for not paying $1,425 in child support while he was a hostage.[6][7][8]
Clarence Brandley, a Texas high school janitor, was wrongly convicted in 1980 of murder. [9] After spending many years in prison and on death row,[10] he was released in 1990 and he then sued the state of Texas for wrongful imprisonment in 1993.[11] The state then responded with a bill for nearly $50,000 in child support that had not been paid while in prison.[12] Dianna Thompson of The American Coalition of Fathers and Children told the Houston Chronicle that federal law makes it illegal for states to forgive child support payments regardless of circumstance. [13] Michael McCormick, of the American Coalition of Fathers and Children said, concerning child support payments, "I'm not aware of any state where it says a wrongly convicted individual is relieved of their obligation." [14] Despite paying child support every month since his release via wage garnishment, Brandley's child support total reached $73,000 in 2003, when a judge reduced his total to $22,000; however, this amount is still more than triple the $7,000 in back child support Brandley owed at the time of his arrest in 1980. [15] Recently, Brandley lost his job in the economic downturn in 2008; he has since lost his car and house as the child support bills and interest keep coming.[16]
Taron James, a U.S. Navy veteran from California, was forced to continue to pay child support until 2006, even after the child was demonstrated by DNA test in 2001 to be not his; James paid $12,000 in such payments.[17][18][19] A California District Court of Appeal eventually set aside the paternity judgment against James in 2006, but the same court denied James' request to have his child support payments reimbursed."
Bradley Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clarence Brandley, a Texas high school janitor, was wrongly convicted in 1980 of murder. [9] After spending many years in prison and on death row,[10] he was released in 1990 and he then sued the state of Texas for wrongful imprisonment in 1993.[11] The state then responded with a bill for nearly $50,000 in child support that had not been paid while in prison.[12] Dianna Thompson of The American Coalition of Fathers and Children told the Houston Chronicle that federal law makes it illegal for states to forgive child support payments regardless of circumstance. [13] Michael McCormick, of the American Coalition of Fathers and Children said, concerning child support payments, "I'm not aware of any state where it says a wrongly convicted individual is relieved of their obligation." [14] Despite paying child support every month since his release via wage garnishment, Brandley's child support total reached $73,000 in 2003, when a judge reduced his total to $22,000; however, this amount is still more than triple the $7,000 in back child support Brandley owed at the time of his arrest in 1980. [15] Recently, Brandley lost his job in the economic downturn in 2008; he has since lost his car and house as the child support bills and interest keep coming.[16]
Taron James, a U.S. Navy veteran from California, was forced to continue to pay child support until 2006, even after the child was demonstrated by DNA test in 2001 to be not his; James paid $12,000 in such payments.[17][18][19] A California District Court of Appeal eventually set aside the paternity judgment against James in 2006, but the same court denied James' request to have his child support payments reimbursed."
Bradley Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nintendough
#Kliq
I need to start coming back here again.
CrossBones
Louder than words
Decency should be afforded to people who arent going out of their way to mean or cruel to others. In a strange way there is a form of checks n balances going on by letting a damaged, and self destructive person only get so far in gaining a respectful acceptance in society. Respect for the most part has to be earned still.
While it hurts these women to be outcasted to some degree, it should at the least give them an opportunity to reevaluate themselves and what theyre doing
