GetInTheTruck
Member
Some of the criticisms of melo are valid but the exaggerated hatred for him is retarded. The knicks are a better team with him on the floor period.
Marginally. Some of y'all need to wake the fukk up. :sassigh:Some of the criticisms of melo are valid but the exaggerated hatred for him is retarded. The knicks are a better team with him on the floor period.
You think Fisher has a rotation look for Amundson to get all the minutes next week.
so who do we trade seraphin or KOQ cause there is no reason to keep both
@Mr. Jack Napier
He could average 45ppg for the rest of the season and I'd still say they should trade him before it's too late.
Too late for what? Some mid first round picks and role players who can barely hang on in the league like Denver did? You don't trade box office guys for garbage.
Look at the Grizzlies as an example of a team that didn't know when to move on.
Some of the criticisms of melo are valid but the exaggerated hatred for him is retarded. The knicks are a better team with him on the floor period.
Marginally. Some of y'all need to wake the fukk up. :sassigh:
Marginally. Some of y'all need to wake the fukk up. :sassigh:
nothing positive can come from trading melo right now
we'll simply go back to the 2002-2009 era of losing where we have no stars
why some ppl are so eager to go back there, i'll never know
phil gotta get some free agents over here
so far every move he has made minus afflalo hasnt worked out
I'll go one step further ....... we will never get to the ecf with melo as our central player and if that is true why have him on the team when we pay hi m so muchI could outline all the mid to late first rounders in the league contributing, but I know that wont matter
It's funny you mention Denver, since they actually have a better record since the Melo trade than the Knicks
Too late, as in before you can't get any kind of value for him, last year it was Jimmy Butler & Niko for him, this year it's "Hey, maybe we can get some mid first rounders?". You get value for him while he still has some and accept the reality of the situation which is the Knicks are not going to win a title with Melo, so why exactly hold onto him like he's the difference between winning and losing a ring?
Look at the Grizzlies as an example of a team that didn't know when to move on.
The thing is,
You don't think the inconsistent minutes and rotations might have something to do with that?
by the time his contract is up, it'll be considered a bargainI'll go one step further ....... we will never get to the ecf with melo as our central player and if that is true why have him on the team when we pay hi m so much
We had no picks in many of those awful years and no promising prospect.nothing positive can come from trading melo right now
we'll simply go back to the 2002-2009 era of losing where we have no stars
why some ppl are so eager to go back there, i'll never know
phil gotta get some free agents over here
so far every move he has made minus affalo hasnt worked out
We had no picks in many of those awful years and no promising prospect.
Carmelo is a net negative in the long run on this team and it's a shame that some of you guy's STILL don't see it.
You guys have several pages you can read by people using common sense, what more do you want?Enlighten the rest of us, please.
You guys have several pages you can read by people using common sense, what more do you want?