I think you're missing the point. Nobody wants Conley for the max or near max it really isn't worth it.
I'm using Conley as a signifier. He is
representative of the kind of investment/move the Knicks should not make, because the return would not be worth it.
The fact is, SOMEBODY is going to max Conley out, unless he stays in Memphis on a hometown discount. I (like you, it seems) don't think the knicks should be that team.
But the overall point is this: If you can improve by 6-8 games for cheap, we should not overspend to improve by 10. I think their approach to last offseason was correct, look for good deals and value, improve the roster where you can, and don't take a huge shot JUST to take a huge shot.
Obviously if this team can sign Durant or LeBron they should do everything in their power to make those moves. But that's a pipe dream.
But Crabbe on the wing? Or trying to steal away Clarkson on a decent RFA offer? Maybe those are more reasonable upgrades, that don't limit your future flexibility, after this team improves and is even more marketable to bigger/better free agents.
I don't know why you started arguing with me if you agree with my original point.