Put Some Hornacek On Our Game: 2016 New York Knicks Offseason Thread

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
The Heat are on the discussing trading him for Dwight Howard, they're potentially turning a D-League pick up into Dwight Howard.Is there any first round pick that could get that return?

Seeing as Dwight's value has plummeted, and Miami doesn't seem to want to re-sign Whiteside, and Houston is broken... I actually think Houston would gladly take a first rounder for Dwight.


Also, you misrepresent my point here and jump to hyperbole fam. My point "Mid to late first rounders are being overvalued" is far from "middle rounders don't really matter that much." Middle rounders production is replaceable and many of those players will be approaching their second contract before they have true value, that's my assertion. Nothing more and nothing less.

My thing is, saying first rounders production is "replaceable" MEANS they don't matter. You are literally saying that they don't matter, because you can get their same production from some unsigned dude in the D-league.

And that completely eliminates the massive savings you get from having somebody giving you that production when you get them as a first rounder, because of the long term control. You don't get that when you sign a free agent from the D-League for a one or two year deal. You don't get NEAR that.




Mid to late firsts removes the lottery guys from the equation so 16 and later are the main picks I'm looking at (ie: likely the only sorts of picks Boston was willing to give up for Melo. Turner (10), Lyles (11), Booker (13) and Oubre (15) would fall out of that discussion and you'd be sitting on 5 picks out of 15...or a 1 in 3 hit rate. But to be fair it's a bunch of rookies, they could progress plenty in the course of their contracts. I'd point more to a draft class like 2012 where we can see players with years of development and only a handful are starting quality. To be fair, 2013 was a pretty deep draft with a lot of capable players going later, but that draft was also extremely weak at the top. So guys like Bennett and Len went top five

I used this year as a reference on how quickly those guys are contributing. If you start using guys that have been in the league 2-3 years, you get even bigger value.

Plus this year is another draft where there's one or two "sure-fire stars" and then a deep pool of guys that could be useful. Outside the lottery could you land Valentine, Zimmerman, Diallo, Luwawu or Korkmaz, Sabonis, LeVert, Cordinier, Hernangomez, newman or monte morris






To which my response was "the deal absolutely has to include that first and it's still shaky because the rest of the picks are mid to late picks." My stance, which hasn't shifted, is that there will be more offers for Melo in the offseason when teams have added cap space which eases the salary matching implications.

Two things:
1) If we got offered Brooklyn's pick, you take it, no hesitations. You'd be crazy to argue otherwise.

2) That assumes Melo doesn't spend the rest of the year in and out of the trainer's room... which right now, doesn't look great. If he continues to look like he's breaking down, nobody will want him at all. AND he'll be not much help to us. On the court, or attracting free agents.




Draft picks is just the most obvious way to keep costs low and has the added bonus of hope. But signing players to smart contracts can be just as impactful.

CAN be, the difference is when you draft a player, you a GUARANTEED to get that player. When you go into free agency HOPING TO FIND a player, you run the risk of NOT getting that player.

A scenario which the knicks have become QUITE accustomed.


Obviously if the team is going to miss the playoffs next season, dumping Melo makes sense...but the team has cap space to see what it can pick up before forcing him out and condemning itself to a rebuild that is guaranteed to take a few years, plus the return on trade could be better.

This is where your hopeful optimism seems to disconnect from reality. You are hoping that as melo ages, he's going to get more valuable. Which just simply doesn't happen all that often. A year and a half ago, we could have had Jimmy Butler, Mirotic or Taj and picks... now we're talking about late firsts, maybe... the trendline is DOWN not UP.

The team is short on talent, the rotation has clear holes. However, if you're thinking in a 5 year increment, then the 20 million dollars in cap space coupled with another big increase next off season should help seal up some of those holes. Youth development should also help with talent. Then having our picks going past this season means shots at adding youth too. Again, none of that is to say that you don't trade Melo for the right package. But trading Melo just for Mozgov and a couple of 50/50 (which I think is overly optimistic oddsmaking even) shots at cheap starters isn't the right deal to move him in. You can afford to be greedy with Melo on a five year plan unless you're more worried about his happiness than your franchise's long term success...but last time we did a favor for an overpaid superstar, the Ewing trade ruined our cap situation for half a decade.

You remember the Ewing trade incorrectly. But that's not really here, nor there.

I kind of can't believe, having watched what the spurs have done, watching the the Warriors have done, seeing what's wrong with the decisions that Cleveland just recently made... watching Miami hollow itself out with lebron after cleveland did the same thing the first time with lebron... people are still advocating to pass first round draft picks up for free agent replacements.

The mind truly boggles.

I'm not even trying to diss, because you know your shyt, and you know what you're talking about... you're just patently on the wrong side of history on this one. Literally every historical trend and precedent shows that keeping an aging vet in these situations is wrong.

:manny:

In the end, we'll just have to see how it shakes out.
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
26,651
Reputation
4,938
Daps
100,724
Reppin
New York City
Melo still has value he just got that NTC with a 8 million trade kicker this summer. If he is gonna be moved it'll be this summer. He'll get his money and another year missing the playoffs nobody will blame him.

Then again this is Olympic summer. Melo down in Rio trying to sell NY to a guys on Team USA is as good a chance the Knicks have to recruit as any.

Honestly all Phil got to do is not trade a pick and I think the Knicks are good long term. I hope they will piggyback on a bigger trade but I still feel this year is donzo. I would try to move KOQ and Calderon for some underrated/underperforming youth to put next to KP and Grant and try to develop. Like McClemore or MCW would both be a good look.
 
Last edited:

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,801
Reputation
5,282
Daps
64,116
Reppin
NYC
Few notes on your other bolded statements -
Look at the trades Howard's name has been involved in, a first round pick isn't getting him except maybe the BK pick.

You keep long term control of a D Leaguer by signing them to a 1+1 deal. That locks up bird rights and maintains flexibility in a way first round picks do not.

If you start using guys from 2 and 3 drafts ago, the hits give more value. The misses are more undeniable. The more important factor here is hits vs misses, what's the ratio...then you can establish the odds of hitting on a long term starting contributor and the odds of getting an overpaid bench player or worse. As far as how deep this draft is, the Boston offer would probably only include one pick in this coming draft and then probably that lottery protected Memphis pick after next season.

Melo's health certainly impacts the amount of suitors he gets in the offseason, however, unless he requires another surgery...interest will be there. It's a star driven league, even Conley and Derozan are about to make ridiculous sums.

It's true that the Knicks can whiff on FA's and come out empty handed. But that beats picking a bust whose guaranteed money is stuck on the books. I'm not arguing that one way is the definitive way to go here, just that both approaches have merits hence my willingness to be patient with dealing Melo. You can chase late firsts in the offseason, that's a package he'll fetch barring serious injury in the last third of the season anyway.

As for optimism blinding me to Melo's trade value deteroirating, my comment has nothing to do with Melo's performance improving his trade value. It's optimism that more teams will have options to add him thanks to the additional cap space in the offseason. That means more teams can give us trade exceptions and picks instead of having to make salaries match, which means more bidders, which means competition and brings you enhanced value. Doesn't have to be a massive improvement, just gotta help us milk more prospects or immediate help into the deal.

You remember the Ewing trade incorrectly. But that's not really here, nor there.

I kind of can't believe, having watched what the spurs have done, watching the the Warriors have done, seeing what's wrong with the decisions that Cleveland just recently made... watching Miami hollow itself out with lebron after cleveland did the same thing the first time with lebron... people are still advocating to pass first round draft picks up for free agent replacements.

The mind truly boggles.

I'm not even trying to diss, because you know your shyt, and you know what you're talking about... you're just patently on the wrong side of history on this one. Literally every historical trend and precedent shows that keeping an aging vet in these situations is wrong.

:manny:

In the end, we'll just have to see how it shakes out.

The Spurs and Warriors did it with their own draft picks and developed players over long spans. We can do that with or without Melo, we're already doing it with Melo in KP. As for every historical trend showing that keeping an aging vet is wrong...Paul Pierce was 30 and the C's had been to the lottery a few times and the Mavericks constructed a champion team around Dirk Nowitzki at 32. There's precedent for it. But I'm not even saying we HAVE to build around Melo; I'm saying if we're going to trade Melo we should aim for a bigger return.
 

KnickstapeCity

RIP Big Dikk :wow: :mjcry:
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Messages
32,802
Reputation
13,707
Daps
105,995
Reppin
New York
Melo still has value he just got that NTC with a 8 million trade kicker this summer. If he is gonna be moved it'll be this summer. He'll get his money and another year missing the playoffs nobody will blame him.

Then again this is Olympic summer. Melo down in Rio trying to sell NY to a guys on Team USA is as good a chance the Knicks have to recruit as any.

Honestly all Phil got to do is not trade a pick and I think the Knicks are good long term. I hope they will piggyback on a bigger trade but I still feel this year is donzo. I would try to move KOQ and Calderon for some underrated/underperforming youth to put next to KP and Grant and try to develop. Like McClemore or MCW would both be a good look.



You lost me when you said MCW :philjacksonlol:









Goodnight brehs :philjacksonlol:
 

Derek Lee

#thunderup
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
37,741
Reputation
4,531
Daps
114,033
12717153_959816147399120_2623756377752517684_n.jpg

Grant is also shooting 45.1% from 0-3 feet from the basket. Needs to play more minutes with KP and shooters around him.
 

Kitsch

Superstar
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,417
Reputation
3,860
Daps
51,019
Reppin
London
I wonder if we could get Mclemore cheap...he's young and his shot's coming along...shows the potential periodically and could benefit from a new location. Wouldn't be a home run but worth a risk? Maybe.
My friend and I have been discussing this, what would it take for the Knicks to acquire one of these young previous first round pick guards that haven't really reached their potential? We were talking about Archie Goodwin in particular but Ben Mac Daddy is definitely a candidate.
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,801
Reputation
5,282
Daps
64,116
Reppin
NYC
My friend and I have been discussing this, what would it take for the Knicks to acquire one of these young previous first round pick guards that haven't really reached their potential? We were talking about Archie Goodwin in particular but Ben Mac Daddy is definitely a candidate.

I think Goodwin would take a bigger asking price, the kid is nice (I'd love to have him, just think he'd cost us). Ben and the Kings have agreed to find him some place else so I think his price will be more reasonable.
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
We can probably keep going back and forth, because we clearly just disagree on a couple of key points, which is fine, because it is all strategy theory, and perspective, right?

You see the misses on mid and late first rounders as hampering you because it's dedicated salary, I think the idea of a 1+1 being equal value as draft rights control being math-averse. You prefer the flexibility of not taking the "risk" on those picks, I see the opportunity of scoring on those picks.

It's like a glass if half full or half empty kind of a thing.

the Mavericks constructed a champion team around Dirk Nowitzki at 32. .

But here is something that to me, can't be reconciled. Dirk was still an elite player at that point, and an true no. 1 option. He HAD been all NBA for 10 years running (and would go on to be all NBA that year, and the year after). He shot 40% from 3, 52% from the field... he was one of the best players in the NBA that season. He had missed ON AVERAGE 2 games per season in the three years leading up to that season.

Carmelo has not been All-NBA in three years. He has been hurt for long stretches of his most recent seasons. He is shooting 43 % from the field and 32% from 3.

Comparing what Dallas did to the knicks doesn't work, because the guy you're building around is not nearly as good as dirk was.

And on TOP of that, Dallas GUTTED themselves to make that run, and have since been left with the ruins of those decisions, since.

All of which kind of brings me back to the fact that you just seem to still hold a higher value for Melo than I do.

I feel bad going back and forth through this thread, most people probably don't care about our dialogue here... but I like talking about the Knicks with you. This thread is the only reason I even check for the coli anymore, on the rare occasions that I come through.

Trade season will be over in two days, Melo will be back on the team, and everyone can get back to talking about the fact that Porzingis is a gawd, Kyle needs more minutes, and the fact that we're missing the playoffs, again.

Then we can start hoping KD signs. :blessed:
 
Top