Hassan Whiteside fits that second group pretty well. He fell to the second round in 2010 and was a negative value for the extent of his rookie contract (and because of his high profile, he got guaranteed money). But as a still young D-League call up, he was a steal. What exactly does that prove in terms of the value of picks versus the value of taking players with pro experience for less? Just to paraphrase this, Whiteside being a successful call-up from the D League for the Heat after costing double the price of a minimum contract to do nothing the Kings 5 years ago does nothing to refute the notion that draft picks are overvalued.
Yeah, but the problem with this logic is... the Heat are about to lose control over him to Free Agency.
And your "Well, middle rounders don't really matter that much" is the kind of thinking that leads to Bargnani-type trades. "Oh, that pick will be in the 20's -- we'll just buy or trade for a second rounder"
Young, viable depth matters. Guaranteeing your ability to have them, relatively cheap, for relatively long, should they pan out, matters. I think we should be betting on our management being able to evaluate talent, especially in light of the Porzingis pick, and the Grant trade, and the Lance signing, and the Gallo signing. I think we should bet ON them picking the right player, than use the possibility that a player might not pan out as some type of boogieman.
Look at the dudes taken in the middle ten of the draft last year: Turner, Lyles, Booker, Oubre, Grant, Anderson
20-30: Portis, Hollis Jefferson, Nance
Those are good guys to have in your rotation, if not good starting quality players RIGHT NOW. At the ages of 19-22.
And sure, there's gonna be a tyus jones in there, but even if it's just 50-50 you get a long-term starter... those are still good odds.
A bunch of picks matter when you're giving Sasha Vujacic significant minutes.
I'm not arguing a straight-up "trade melo" line, because I don't necessarily know that THAT is the answer, but I know that this team needs more talent. A bunch more. And I now our franchise player's track is the opposite of the player for whom we are paying lots of money.
We aren't a playoff team this year. I tried to explain that almost two months ago, and nobody wanted to hear it.
And there is a very good chance, based on current trajectories, that we will struggle to be a playoff team next season. (Obviously this does not account for us signing, let's say Durant)
You have to think in 5+ year increments when building a team. That's what the spurs do. That's what the Warriors have done. Look at how Miami is failing now. Look at how strapped Cleveland is. The Clippers. The Rockets.
Consistency is hard, and it demands constant care.
Anyway, I doubt we make a major move. I just, as always, think we need to get real about the fact that this team is still REALLY short on talent. And you have to figure a way to increase it, because we've seen that just hitting on one great player is rarely enough.