PS4 and 720 to be revealed in MARCH!! PS4 out the door first!

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,554
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,321
Reppin
CALI
Why limit the pool to just exclusives? Cuz if we talk about multiplats you'll be forced to leeeeeeean.
And there are Waaaay more multiplats than exclusives so you guys :ufdup:

I'll tell you the same thing I told dumbass fatboi. That article is talking about console games because of this reason. What game on PC doesn't look better than Uncharted 2 :stopitslime:
That would be like coming up with an article that says "5 games that look better than MGS1 on xbox 360" (Crysis 1 PC shyts on KZ2, fukk outta here)

Do you see what I'm saying here? If you follow, at least admit you made a mistake and keep it movin. Fatboi has yet to admit his mistake, will you?
Also, when ps3 heads talk up games they mention any exclusive and act like its :ahh:
Heavenly Sword? That was originally an xbox game but they felt the game sucked and so it was ported to the ps3 (Tru Story)
And funny how your bringing up Last of Us right after you tried to bash an article for speaking on Gears before it released

YALL SEE HOW THESE fakkitS DO
:smugdraper:

So tell me sir, have you played Crysis 2? Did you play the entire game or just the beta? We can check your gamertag/psn joint to see ourselves
I know the answer to this, and so do you. So run along now kid...

Well Killzone 2 did look good, I personally liked KZ3 better :hula:
With that said, you guys seem hellbent on your opinions on graphical benchmarks
Gears of War costed 10mil to make. KZ2 was closer to 100mil to make
You ever hear of blockbuster movies and budgets? Bigger budget, bigger explosions. Thats the reason the ps3 has had games look as good as they have
That reason alone, not cuz the ps3 is just more capable.

Now with that said, gameplay is KEY.. MOST IMPORTANT. KZ fails in that department and is not known as a TOP FPS to anyone. But it gets talked about like its not an afterthought of a game. Why do ps3 gamers just name exclusives that nobody played is beyond my comprehension, but good luck with that...

Clear, to the point, and honest. :salute:
I own crysis 2 bytch nikka, look up my psn, both of them, mikelott and MunchY_MikE_420


Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,850
Reputation
5
Daps
1,947
Reppin
NULL
My preference is Xbox all day but I can admit kill zone 3 is graphically better than crysis 2 on consoles.

Uncharted being that much better than everything on the box is one I cannot agree with. I'd say the animations are some of the best for that type of game it is but just raw graphics its really no better than gears 3 IMO. The animations are better...I'll give you that....that's bout it. They are both very impressive graphically but they also have completely different art styles so that's another thing.

Kill zone 3 was the first ps3 game that really wowed me graphically...everything else I felt I've seen equal on the Xbox on something....SINGLE player that is...online wasnt that impressive graphically. I think gears in general has the best online multi graphics.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,534
Reputation
27,657
Daps
507,034
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
My preference is Xbox all day but I can admit kill zone 3 is graphically better than crysis 2 on consoles.

Uncharted being that much better than everything on the box is one I cannot agree with. I'd say the animations are some of the best for that type of game it is but just raw graphics its really no better than gears 3 IMO. The animations are better...I'll give you that....that's bout it. They are both very impressive graphically but they also have completely different art styles so that's another thing.

Kill zone 3 was the first ps3 game that really wowed me graphically...everything else I felt I've seen equal on the Xbox on something....SINGLE player that is...online wasnt that impressive graphically. I think gears in general has the best online multi graphics.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

I can dig this. The one thing Gears benefits from online is the way shyt is setup in a "corridor" meaning that you can do more with the engine in a smaller scope.

That's one thing that impresses me about Battlefield.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,722
Reputation
7,980
Daps
111,186
My preference is Xbox all day but I can admit kill zone 3 is graphically better than crysis 2 on consoles.

Uncharted being that much better than everything on the box is one I cannot agree with. I'd say the animations are some of the best for that type of game it is but just raw graphics its really no better than gears 3 IMO. The animations are better...I'll give you that....that's bout it. They are both very impressive graphically but they also have completely different art styles so that's another thing.

Kill zone 3 was the first ps3 game that really wowed me graphically...everything else I felt I've seen equal on the Xbox on something....SINGLE player that is...online wasnt that impressive graphically. I think gears in general has the best online multi graphics.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

Trust me Gears 3 looks good but UC3 SP has some parts in it that just isn't comparable to Gears. Gears 3 MP gfx>UC3 MP GFX but SP on UC3 looks ridiculous. Up close textures, water effects, the facial details and the desert is just straight up eye candy for UC3.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
47
Reputation
0
Daps
26
Reppin
NULL
Edit* Sorry, not sure why the person I quoted didn't show up. I was talking about the conversion about backwards compatibility, and two scaler chips. *

Interesting that they took that conversation down. Looks like news got a little too hot to handle, and wanted to cover Sources ass.

These are new updated numbers from this site, that were cryptic hints regarding the new xbox back in 2012. Check this post out.

The Next Xbox is Code-Named…Durango

Quote from: miDnIghtEr20C on March 06, 2012, 06:33:02 PM
Ok, well, you know here at Showtime for Free, we have some great members.. anyways.. some of these members know some people... I'll I'm going to say is we saw some really cool interesting hints, well.. possible hints, regarding the "Durango" on the great SfF chat room. Spoilers of a sort, abound... Xbox 360 Bot

Spoiler for Hiden:
I'll give you a bit more info around the 5t, 8t, 4G, 6G...


Spoiler for Hiden:
5 and 4 are related.


Spoiler for Hiden:
6 and 8 are related


Spoiler for Hiden:
T is the first letter for something G is the first letter for something


Spoiler for Hiden:
T----, and G----


Spoiler for Hiden:
voltan: t is....terabytes? nope!


Spoiler for Hiden:
Yes... 6G 8T - related... 4G 5T related


Spoiler for Hiden:
miD:: G.. games? Hmmm... you might be on to something there, Mid... ;-)


Spoiler for Hiden:
the 4/5 and 6/8 refer to something with regards to specs... not games...


Spoiler for Hiden:
Well, now I've given you a hint about the games, and a hint about the specs... just remember this when we do our official announcements...


So there you have it... what can this mean? Can anyone figure out based on these cryptic messages? Ninja

And now we have updated clues... Let's figure this shyt out... New numbers...

20...8T, 8T - 5G, 6G ...13

Let's do it boys.

So the old numbers in 2012 were.

" 20... 5T,8T - 4G, 6G ...13"

and have now been updated just the other day to.

"20...8T, 8T - 5G, 6G ...13"

Any guesses guys? And who am I? Maybe I'm someone who can't wait for the new Xbox, and happen to have some inside information (rumors), that has not been post on Video Game Rumors yet.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,722
Reputation
7,980
Daps
111,186
Interesting that they took that conversation down. Looks like news got a little too hot to handle, and wanted to cover Sources ass.

These are new updated numbers from this site, that were cryptic hints regarding the new xbox back in 2012. Check this post out.

The Next Xbox is Code-Named…Durango



So the old numbers in 2012 were.

" 20... 5T,8T - 4G, 6G ...13"

and have now been updated just the other day to.

"20...8T, 8T - 5G, 6G ...13"

Any guesses guys? And who am I? Maybe I'm someone who can't wait for the new Xbox, and happen to have some inside information (rumors), that has not been post on Video Game Rumors yet.
20 GB hard drive for apps
8 Terrible exclusive luanch games
8 Terrible kinect games
4 GB DRR2 RAm
6 Gay ass camera's on the next kinect
13 Year olds will buy it.

:troll:
 

b_low_brown

Daddyface
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
12,297
Reputation
-4,126
Daps
35,381
Well Killzone 2 did look good, I personally liked KZ3 better :hula:
With that said, you guys seem hellbent on your opinions on graphical benchmarks
Gears of War costed 10mil to make. KZ2 was closer to 100mil to make
You ever hear of blockbuster movies and budgets? Bigger budget, bigger explosions. Thats the reason the ps3 has had games look as good as they have
That reason alone, not cuz the ps3 is just more capable.

Now with that said, gameplay is KEY.. MOST IMPORTANT. KZ fails in that department and is not known as a TOP FPS to anyone. But it gets talked about like its not an afterthought of a game. Why do ps3 gamers just name exclusives that nobody played is beyond my comprehension, but good luck with that...

Clear, to the point, and honest. :salute:

:troll:

All I said was that killzone 2 was the best looking game this gen and that nothing on the 360 touches it. Most of your response has no relation to what I said & the point I was making.

"Why do ps3 gamers just name exclusives that nobody played is beyond my comprehension"

I played it. My friends played it.. Just because it didnt do halo numbers doesn't make the fact that it looks better than any 360 title any less true.

"Now with that said, gameplay is KEY.. MOST IMPORTANT. KZ fails in that department and is not known as a TOP FPS to anyone"

...what? I had no problems with the gameplay. It was smooth & ran well. I actually don't know what you were getting at with this one. & who cares if its a "top FPS" or not, a good exclusive is a good exclusive.

If we're hellbent on graphical benchmarks then you're sure as hell hellbent on sales & public perception.. Which of those actually have an effect on the game itself?

Your whole post.. Breh.. C'mon now :laff:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,722
Reputation
7,980
Daps
111,186
:troll:

All I said was that killzone 2 was the best looking game this gen and that nothing on the 360 touches it. Most of your response has no relation to what I said & the point I was making.

"Why do ps3 gamers just name exclusives that nobody played is beyond my comprehension"

I played it. My friends played it.. Just because it didnt do halo numbers doesn't make the fact that it looks better than any 360 title any less true.

"Now with that said, gameplay is KEY.. MOST IMPORTANT. KZ fails in that department and is not known as a TOP FPS to anyone"

...what? I had no problems with the gameplay. It was smooth & ran well. I actually don't know what you were getting at with this one. & who cares if its a "top FPS" or not, a good exclusive is a good exclusive.

If we're hellbent on graphical benchmarks then you're sure as hell hellbent on sales & public perception.. Which of those actually have an effect on the game itself?

Your whole post.. Breh.. C'mon now :laff:

Aww hell naw Court about to clutter this thread with

Mattress-less Ass nigguh said:
:stopitslime: NOBODY on here played KZ2 except one lonely 3cept. Who tryna get on RIGHT NOW? :popcorn:
The gameplay was NOT up to snuff compared to Halo 3.
*inserts quote from review praising Halo*
Blah blah blah
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,850
Reputation
5
Daps
1,947
Reppin
NULL
Kill zone 3 had a dope single player IMO...I had no problems with gameplay *shrugs*...I thought it was underrated

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
 
Top