Kill zone 3 had a dope single player IMO...I had no problems with gameplay *shrugs*...I thought it was underrated
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
It struggled in the multiplayer with framerate issues.
Kill zone 3 had a dope single player IMO...I had no problems with gameplay *shrugs*...I thought it was underrated
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
It struggled in the multiplayer with framerate issues.
It struggled in the multiplayer with framerate issues.
I was talking bout single player.
Multi got old kind of quick...not enough maps
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
I never played single, bought the shyt for multi it was fun for a bit with the sohhacans... framerate is incredibly choppy and inconsistent in warzone. Salamun Market at times felt like it dropped well below 20 frames which is unacceptable imo, GG needs to focus on their framerate next outing instead of MLAA glossing. snow drift is literally unplayable when you get above 14 players.
am i lying? Multiplayer is the most important aspect of the game and it runs like shyt which is why it had a short shelf life and the IP has yet to gain fame.
Yes. KZ3 ain't battlefield. You done missed out on the best part of the game. You've done a terrible mistake KZ3 SP is light years ahead of it's MP graphically. If you haven't tried it yet then you can't really say much about the game's graphics. That's like me talking about Gears 3 and all I played was beast mode.
I've played the single i haven't completed it, I haven't even started halo's single player your point?
What game on PC doesn't look better than Uncharted 2
That would be like coming up with an article that says "5 games that look better than MGS1 on xbox 360" (Crysis 1 PC shyts on KZ2, fukk outta here)
And funny how your bringing up Last of Us right after you tried to bash an article for speaking on Gears before it released
Well Killzone 2 did look good, I personally liked KZ3 better
With that said, you guys seem hellbent on your opinions on graphical benchmarks
Gears of War costed 10mil to make. KZ2 was closer to 100mil to make
You ever hear of blockbuster movies and budgets? Bigger budget, bigger explosions. Thats the reason the ps3 has had games look as good as they have
That reason alone, not cuz the ps3 is just more capable.
quit praising meteocracy
I was with you up to this one doggie....
Are you this dumb on purpose?At the time there were plenty of comparisons made between Uncharted 2 ans Crysis2(pc version) While I agree that Crysis 2 graphics on pc are 2nd to none, it's actually a compliment that a PS3 game is compared to the best looking PC games at the moment but I just find it strange that there's never any Xbox titles people compare with pc games... And your dumb ass analogy of Uncharted is to Crysis2(PC) as MGS1 is to (insert title) on xbox 360 is why people be sitting with the face every time you post.
But you was raised in a school of meteocracy100 mill??
Try 45 mill dumb ass bytch... 45 aint no chump change but these nikkas started from scratch with a new engine pushing the ps3 to its limits.. Gears 2 just recycled the Unreal engine and upscaled shyt from Gears 1.. quit praising meteocracy
Are you this dumb on purpose?
Lets try this again. The article was not comparing PC games to PS3
Crysis 1 murders Uncharted 1/2/3/4 in graphics, they wouldn't then compare crysis 2 to it. You really didn't know this, but thats ok. YOU DO NOW.
You can disagree, but what I just said is FACT (minus the Uncharted 4 since its not out yet)
And you then say ppl are looking at me with a face?
I wanna lash out and say "Man, your the dumbest piece of shyt" but instead of doing that, I'll just say "Sir, you are sadly mistaken"
Just like with everything else you say like...
But you was raised in a school of meteocracy
Not sure where you got your 45mil number from, but the original number was 61million. Well, 20mil. Then 30,. then 40... then it was known to be at 60million by 2008, and the game never seen the light of day for another 2yrs after that
Around launch it was well talked about, and sony felt best saying 61million. But they didn't add advertising and shyt like that. It reached 100mil
I know your just trying to learn about it now, go check out wikipedia.. it still has the original 20million
I'm not here fighting you over this, I actually know wtf I"m talking about cuz lame shyt like this interest me (Tru Story)
This is your first time talking about this, not mine
The Halo franchise has been so successful for Bungie and Microsoft that they virtually had an unlimited budget on Halo 3, as it had to be the best and most impressive game in almost all aspects when it was released. It pretty much was, at a price of $55 million, which excludes over $200 million Microsoft spent promoting the game.
Durango to be backwards compatible and have TWO scaler chips?
this is big if true
and vgleaks is revealing something monday btw
Source: so, the next controller will be very similar, but there are some awesome core gamer changes...
(20:48:10) Source: next gen force feedback on triggers and analog stcks
(20:49:24) miDnIghtEr20C: what!!?!!??!
(20:49:24) Source: plus, a discrete screen in the center. you dont see it when the screen is off, but it's amazing... it delivers some crucial information to the user...
(20:49:29) miDnIghtEr20C: that sounds wild!
Source: charging and batteries tbd... likely similar to 360...
(20:50:36) miDnIghtEr20C: i don't mind batteries
(20:50:43) miDnIghtEr20C: that sounds awesome though
(20:50:48) miDnIghtEr20C: wow.. on the sticks and triggers?
(20:50:50) miDnIghtEr20C: interesting.
(20:51:25) Source: Forza feels fukking amazing with it.
(20:51:50) miDnIghtEr20C: wow
(20:51:54) miDnIghtEr20C: i didn't even think of that!
(20:51:59) miDnIghtEr20C: and a tiny screen?
(20:52:28) Source: it's not tiny... it's just discrete.
(20:52:41) miDnIghtEr20C: interesting.
We dropped info again on both sites...
Durango Controller to feature a screen? Also rumble on trigger buttons and analog sticks?
The Next Xbox is Code-Named Durango