Predict Trent Richardson aka 'Struggle Cuts' stats in Indy?

[jadillac]

1ypg just like his fradulent Heisman teammate in New Orleans.

MArk Ingram is a good player in a the wrong system.

If he was on the Giants or somewhere like that, he'd be a 1,100 yard rusher

 

[MoneyTron]

MArk Ingram is a good player in a the wrong system.

If he was on the Giants or somewhere like that, he'd be a 1,100 yard rusher

Fraud. Ben Tate was the best RB in Alabama in 2009.

 

[Trojan 24]

MArk Ingram is a good player in a the wrong system.

If he was on the Giants or somewhere like that, he'd be a 1,100 yard rusher

IDK bruh, I don't even watch many Saint games but I've seen him stopped on a 3rd or 4th and short more time then I can count. Like last week when they tried that run before the half, every Saint fan knew homie was getting stopped. Like Trent he just seems to lack the explosion or burst through the line

 

[Buggsy Mogues]

You guys have a horrible habit of using AD as if anyone not as good as him simply isn't that good. shyt is tired.

A running back needs a good o line. I saw Thomas Jones rush for over 1,600 yards while eluding or breaking LESS than one tackle per game due to line play.

Stop misusing AD to shyt on the golden rule of needing a o line to produce. All AD needs is for someone to get in the way. He's an anomaly.

If you're drafting a RB in the top 3 in 2012, when it's so easy to plug and play any old RB and have success, then the AD comparisons will come because that guy should be elite.

What you are basically saying with the bolded part is that any average RB can rack up yards behind a great OL. You're proving my point for me. If that's the case then what is the point of trading a first round pick for a RB? Or what is the point of drafting one in the top 3? You think the Redskins would ever fukking draft a RB in the top 3?

Cleveland did the right thing by getting rid of an average RB in Richardson and Indy made a mistake in giving up a first round pick for a fukking RB in 2013. Quality RB's are falling off trees these days.

 

[NSSVO]

Mark Ingram is in a pass only offense. There was no reason for the Saints to even draft him.

 

[Buggsy Mogues]

Mark Ingram is in a pass only offense. There was no reason for the Saints to even draft him.

The Saints have a good OL and a wide open passing game. The fact that he looks so average makes him even worse. There's no excuse for him to not be racking up huge yards in that offense.

 

[jadillac]

IDK bruh, I don't even watch many Saint games but I've seen him stopped on a 3rd or 4th and short more time then I can count. Like last week when they tried that run before the half, every Saint fan knew homie was getting stopped. Like Trent he just seems to lack the explosion or burst through the line

Yeah, he hasnt looked too good there at times, but I just dont think they're a good team for certain RB's.

Not to mention he foesnt get many carries to get into the flow of the game

 

[NYC Rebel]

If you're drafting a RB in the top 3 in 2012, when it's so easy to plug and play any old RB and have success, then the AD comparisons will come because that guy should be elite.

What you are basically saying with the bolded part is that any average RB can rack up yards behind a great OL. You're proving my point for me. If that's the case then what is the point of trading a first round pick for a RB? Or what is the point of drafting one in the top 3? You think the Redskins would ever fukking draft a RB in the top 3?

Cleveland did the right thing by getting rid of an average RB in Richardson and Indy made a mistake in giving up a first round pick for a fukking RB in 2013. Quality RB's are falling off trees these days.

I won't argue the fact that the Browns reached with that pick.

 

[Trip]

If you're drafting a RB in the top 3 in 2012, when it's so easy to plug and play any old RB and have success, then the AD comparisons will come because that guy should be elite.

What you are basically saying with the bolded part is that any average RB can rack up yards behind a great OL. You're proving my point for me. If that's the case then what is the point of trading a first round pick for a RB? Or what is the point of drafting one in the top 3? You think the Redskins would ever fukking draft a RB in the top 3?

Cleveland did the right thing by getting rid of an average RB in Richardson and Indy made a mistake in giving up a first round pick for a fukking RB in 2013. Quality RB's are falling off trees these days.

Colts did it twice in the 90's. Ha. Peyton and Marshall didnt get along though....if Trich can be Luck's Edge, then I guess we can't fault it.

 

[SoulController]

http://www.talk-sports.net/nfl/sucks.aspx/Trent_Richardson

 

[jaguar paw]

Still at the Browns getting a first round pick back for this limbless ball of muscle

 

[klientel]

Damn wtf do you do with Trent.....

He needs to be benched because he's easily the worst RB on the team but the Colts would look like a joke if they did.

 

[BLAZO da GAWD]

i can't believe the coli think he's a bust. he was in cleveland for fukks sake. i think he will ball out in the nap

 

[Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD]

i can't believe the coli think he's a bust. he was in cleveland for fukks sake. i think he will ball out in the nap

Wrong. Shocking.

 

[Piff Perkins]

This nikka plants his feet before a cut/bust like he's bracing to kiss a fat bytch. Hesitant as hell