POTUS or Prisoner; The '24 Trump Campaign Fvckery thread

[Legal]

big if true

That shyt doesn't even make sense at a basic level.

James Woods, a man who very publicly dislikes Joe Biden, has decided to dedicate his entire life to impersonating said man that he doesn't like, despite being dead, in order to.......complicate the process of the people who he actually DOES like accomplishing their political agenda?

shyt doesn't make it past a single basic clarifying question.

 

[Jx2]

these republicans are such disgusting, pathetic cucks

Can’t wait for this punk bytch to step down as governor of my state. Rethugs are going to try to go full tilt MAGA for the governor seat but NH is way too moderate and I don’t see that being successful. He’s the definition of milquetoast

 

[Jx2]

New Mexican standoff

 

[greenvale]

Can’t wait to see Trumps stupid orange face after he takes another L

 

[MushroomX]

After the Iowa Caucus.

Got damn CNN is literally reporting right now that Vivek plans to drop out.

 

[Robbie3000]

After the Iowa Caucus.

Nimatra is the H.I.I.C. There can only be one.

 

[Big Jo]

After the Iowa Caucus.

Good riddance clown. Hope this bozo goes away forever

 

[the cac mamba]

Indian Eminem is finished

 

[MushroomX]

Take it what you will from 2016 and 2024 when Trump was not the incumbent for the Iowa Caucus.

2024 Results:

Total:	110,298	100.00%	40	0	40
Donald Trump	56,260	51.0%	20	0	20
Ron DeSantis	23,420	21.2%	9	0	9
Nikki Haley	21,085	19.1%	8	0	8
Vivek Ramaswamy	8,449	7.7%	3	0	3
Ryan Binkley	774	0.7%	0	0	0
Asa Hutchinson	191	0.2%	0	0	0
Other	84	0.1%	0	0	0
Chris Christie (withdrawn)	35	<0.1%	0	0	0

2016 Results:

Total:	186,932	100.00%	30	0	30
Ted Cruz	51,666	27.64%	8	0	8
Donald Trump	45,427	24.3%	7	0	7
Marco Rubio	43,165	23.12%	7	0	7
Ben Carson	17,395	9.3%	3	0	3
Rand Paul	8,481	4.54%	1	0	1
Jeb Bush	5,238	2.8%	1	0	1
Carly Fiorina	3,485	1.86%	1	0	1
John Kasich	3,474	1.86%	1	0	1
Mike Huckabee	3,345	1.79%	1	0	1
Chris Christie	3,284	1.76%	0	0	0
Rick Santorum	1,783	0.95%	0	0	0
Other	117	0.06%	0	0	0
Jim Gilmore	12	0.01%	0	0	0

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I was just thinking, if Trump dropped out of the race for any reason, would anything change?

Would his supporters even stop voting for him?

 

[Legal]

Take it what you will from 2016 and 2024 when Trump was not the incumbent for the Iowa Caucus.

2024 Results:

Total:	110,298	100.00%	40	0	40
Donald Trump	56,260	51.0%	20	0	20
Ron DeSantis	23,420	21.2%	9	0	9
Nikki Haley	21,085	19.1%	8	0	8
Vivek Ramaswamy	8,449	7.7%	3	0	3
Ryan Binkley	774	0.7%	0	0	0
Asa Hutchinson	191	0.2%	0	0	0
Other	84	0.1%	0	0	0
Chris Christie (withdrawn)	35	<0.1%	0	0	0

2016 Results:

Total:	186,932	100.00%	30	0	30
Ted Cruz	51,666	27.64%	8	0	8
Donald Trump	45,427	24.3%	7	0	7
Marco Rubio	43,165	23.12%	7	0	7
Ben Carson	17,395	9.3%	3	0	3
Rand Paul	8,481	4.54%	1	0	1
Jeb Bush	5,238	2.8%	1	0	1
Carly Fiorina	3,485	1.86%	1	0	1
John Kasich	3,474	1.86%	1	0	1
Mike Huckabee	3,345	1.79%	1	0	1
Chris Christie	3,284	1.76%	0	0	0
Rick Santorum	1,783	0.95%	0	0	0
Other	117	0.06%	0	0	0
Jim Gilmore	12	0.01%	0	0	0

What immediately jumps out to me is that for all of the talk about it being a historic win, there could be a decent argument for this being equally a result of Trump's dominance, and a smaller field filled with less comparably credible candidates.

Also, we definitely have an Oochie Wally or One Mic moment brewing with there being 76,000 less voters. On one hand, obviously, the weather. But on the other, the narrative definitely seemed like it was that they were getting objectively great turnout, despite the weather.

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

I was just thinking, if Trump dropped out of the race for any reason, would anything change?

Would his supporters even stop voting for him?

They won’t vote at all unless he’s on the ballot

 

[Hood Critic]

What immediately jumps out to me is that for all of the talk about it being a historic win, there could be a decent argument for this being equally a result of Trump's dominance, and a smaller field filled with less comparably credible candidates.

Also, we definitely have an Oochie Wally or One Mic moment brewing with there being 76,000 less voters. On one hand, obviously, the weather. But on the other, the narrative definitely seemed like it was that they were getting objectively great turnout, despite the weather.

Considering there are supposed to be roughly 800K registered Rs in Iowa and he only managed to capture half of 110K - he statistically underperformed.

They're running with the narrative that this was a landslide victory for him but to your point, there was another 80K potential voters who could have made those margins closer.

 

[Legal]

Considering there are supposed to be roughly 800K registered Rs in Iowa and he only managed to capture half of 110K - he statistically underperformed.

They're running with the narrative that this was a landslide victory for him but to your point, there was another 80K potential voters who could have made those margins closer.

I also think they're going off the assumption that the majority of those people that didn't show up last night are just going to vote for him. One, that's a HUGE assumption, and two, even if that holds true, you can really only apply that logic to voters who were already going to vote Republican anyway. It's been said a million times, but that's great news for a primary, but it doesn't necessarily tell you much about the ACTUAL election.

Or, another way to look at it is that at least in my lifetime, we haven't seen a president serve two terms that weren't consecutive. For all practical effects, for the GOP, he's an incumbent. This is showing why you never see this happen with parties with an actual incumbent, aside from the obvious reason.

 

[Reality Check]