POTUS or Prisoner; The '24 Trump Campaign Fvckery thread

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
32,779
Reputation
1,406
Daps
60,959
Reppin
got a call for three nines

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,591
Reputation
3,580
Daps
107,156
Reppin
דעת

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
18,745
Reputation
5,635
Daps
74,267
Reppin
#ByrdGang
Big talk, but VivekGPT will never avoid the George Soros connection.

Political Career suicide.

You're assuming that everyone is as high information as you are.

In September 2023, What percentage of the American population do you think even know who Vivek is let alone about the Soros connection? I'd bet around 50 or less for the former and a maximum of 25 % for the latter.

Higher learning is filled with political junkies, we are not representative of the general population.
 

MushroomX

Packers Stockholder
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
25,835
Reputation
8,845
Daps
110,101
Reppin
Wisconsin
You're assuming that everyone is as high information as you are.

True, but I think your forgetting one thing... we are talking about MAGA.

Telegram, X.com, and Facebook. As long as those sites are on, MAGA will KNOW about Vivek's stuff ironically by accident.

Before Trump, it was Trump vs. Democrats/Liberals... but now it's Trump vs. Republicans.

Because of the Trump base... they are convinced Ron DeSantis is homosexual... and they know Vivek is part of the Swamp.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State
You're assuming that everyone is as high information as you are.

In September 2023, What percentage of the American population do you think even know who Vivek is let alone about the Soros connection? I'd bet around 50 or less for the former and a maximum of 25 % for the latter.

Higher learning is filled with political junkies, we are not representative of the general population.
its enough in the conspiracy world to tank him, not that most republicans know this
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State



The deep state tells Biden to retire​

Biden

It’s the worst-kept secret in Washington.

Joe Biden is too old to be president. His increasing senility cannot be hidden from the public any longer. Recent polling indicates that more than two-thirds of Democrats think Biden is too elderly to serve another term in the Oval Office.

The problem Democrats face is who to replace Biden with. Vice President Kamala Harris may be much younger, but she’s even less popular than Biden. Any Republican opponent would likely easily defeat Harris, who apparently can’t get through an interview without awkward laughter. The Democratic bench looking at 2024 is weak, thanks to eight years of devastating local and state-level setbacks during Barack Obama’s presidency, which liberals ignored then but deeply regret now.

INFLATION TICKED UP TO 3.7% IN AUGUST, DRIVEN BY GAS PRICES

It was only a matter of time before a major liberal pundit came forward to publicly deliver the bad news: Joe, it’s time to go.

Now, it’s happened, care of David Ignatius, a Washington Post associate editor and senior foreign affairs writer. Ignatius has thrown down the gauntlet to Biden with a column bluntly titled: "President Biden should not run again in 2024." Dispensing the required pleasantries about Biden’s "remarkable string of wins," Ignatius adds, "What I admire most about President Biden is that in a polarized nation, he has governed from the center out."

This will be news to Republicans.

Finally, he gets to the point: "But I don’t think Biden and Vice President Harris should run for reelection. It’s painful to say that, given my admiration for much of what they have accomplished. But if he and Harris campaign together in 2024, I think Biden risks undoing his greatest achievement — which was stopping Trump."

Ignatius states the obvious: Joe is too old for the job, adding acidly, "Biden’s age isn’t just a Fox News trope; it’s been the subject of dinner-table conversations across America this summer." Ignatius then switches to Harris and why she’s hopeless too, sticking in the shiv: "Harris has many laudable qualities, but the simple fact is that she has failed to gain traction in the country or even within her own party." Ignatius advises Joe to go away, preferably soon, so as to allow the Democrats time to assemble a better team to win the White House in 2024. "Time is running out," he says.

This public lecture will have caused gnashing of teeth at the White House. Ignatius is a top member of the Democratic media elite. The son of a prominent Democratic player, Paul Ignatius (still alive at almost 103), who served as Secretary of the Navy and president of the Washington Post, the younger Ignatius was raised in Washington, DC, educated at St. Albans, then Harvard . He’s worked in top-level D.C. journalism for over four decades and has been at the Post since 1986. David Ignatius is the Washington Democratic media elite wrapped up in one person.

But there’s another side to Ignatius, too, and here’s where things get interesting.

For decades, Ignatius has cultivated a close relationship with the intelligence community, particularly the Central Intelligence Agency. It’s common knowledge in spook circles that Ignatius has long served as an unofficial CIA spokesman. His Post columns form a better guide to what’s happening out at Langley than official CIA press releases. When Ignatius comments on intelligence matters, as he frequently does, it’s often Langley’s leadership, what spooks call "the seventh floor," that’s doing the talking.

This is an open secret in Washington. Ignatius also writes spy novels, lots of them, many of which are thinly veiled retellings of real-life actual espionage operations that were presumably told to him by CIA officials. One of those novels was even praised on the CIA’s official website as "a novel but not fiction." That Ignatius has Langley’s imprimatur is indicated by his regular appearances with CIA senior officials.


Therefore, Ignatius perhaps isn’t just speaking for himself with his latest Postcolumn. True, Ignatius's suggestion that Karen Bass would make a good Democratic candidate for president in 2024 is a strange one. The former congresswoman and current Los Angeles mayor enjoyed a very close relationshipwith Cuban intelligence for years. Nevertheless, Ignatius’ main point — it’s time to go, Joe — cannot be misinterpreted.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM RESTORING AMERICA

For all the Republican rants against the Deep State since 2016, it seems that top intelligence officials have decided that an elderly president, who now faces an impeachment inquiry in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives amid plausible if not yet proven allegations of corruption involving Communist China, needs to be shown the door, as soon as possible. Your friends, they say, stab you in the front.

John R. Schindler served with the National Security Agency as a senior intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,662
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,890
Reppin
The Deep State
The CIA is signaling they think Biden shouldn't run:


Opinion | President Biden should not run for reelection in 2024
David Ignatius

President Biden at a campaign rally for Democrats Josh Shapiro and John Fetterman in Philadelphia on Nov. 5, 2022. (Patrick Semansky/AP)
President Biden at a campaign rally for Democrats Josh Shapiro and John Fetterman in Philadelphia on Nov. 5, 2022. (Patrick Semansky/AP)
Joe Biden launched his candidacy for president in 2019 with the words “we are in the battle for the soul of this nation.” He was right. And though it wasn’t obvious at first to many Democrats, he was the best person to wage that fight. He was a genial but also shrewd campaigner for the restoration of what legislators call “regular order.”
Since then, Biden has had a remarkable string of wins. He defeated President Donald Trump in the 2020 election; he led a Democratic rebuff of Trump’s acolytes in the 2022 midterms; his Justice Department has systematically prosecuted the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection that Trump championed and, now, through special counsel Jack Smith, the department is bringing Trump himself to justice.
What I admire most about President Biden is that in a polarized nation, he has governed from the center out, as he promised in his victory speech. With an unexpectedly steady hand, he passed some of the most important domestic legislation in recent decades. In foreign policy, he managed the delicate balance of helping Ukraine fight Russia without getting America itself into a war. In sum, he has been a successful and effective president.
Story continues below advertisement

But I don’t think Biden and Vice President Harris should run for reelection. It’s painful to say that, given my admiration for much of what they have accomplished. But if he and Harris campaign together in 2024, I think Biden risks undoing his greatest achievement — which was stopping Trump.

Biden wrote his political testament in his inaugural address: “When our days are through, our children and our children’s children will say of us: They gave their best, they did their duty, they healed a broken land.” Mr. President, maybe this is that moment when duty has been served.
Opinions on the 2024 elections

Biden would carry two big liabilities into a 2024 campaign. He would be 82 when he began a second term. According to a recent Associated Press-NORC poll, 77 percent of the public, including 69 percent of Democrats, think he’s too old to be effective for four more years. Biden’s age isn’t just a Fox News trope; it’s been the subject of dinner-table conversations across America this summer.
Story continues below advertisement

Because of their concerns about Biden’s age, voters would sensibly focus on his presumptive running mate, Harris. She is less popular than Biden, with a 39.5 percent approval rating, according to polling website FiveThirtyEight. Harris has many laudable qualities, but the simple fact is that she has failed to gain traction in the country or even within her own party.
Biden could encourage a more open vice-presidential selection process that could produce a stronger running mate. There are many good alternatives, starting with now-Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass, whom I wish Biden had chosen in the first place, or Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo. But breaking up the ticket would be a free-for-all that could alienate Black women, a key constituency. Biden might end up more vulnerable.

Politicians who know Biden well say that if he were convinced that Trump were truly vanquished, he would feel he had accomplished his political mission. He will run again if he believes in his gut that Trump will be the GOP nominee and that he has the best chance to defeat Trump and save the country from the nightmare of a revenge presidency.

Story continues below advertisement

Biden has never been good at saying no. He should have resisted the choice of Harris, who was a colleague of his beloved son Beau when they were both state attorneys general. He should have blocked then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, which has done considerable damage to the island’s security. He should have stopped his son Hunter from joining the board of a Ukrainian gas company and representing companies in China — and he certainly should have resisted Hunter’s attempts to impress clients by getting Dad on the phone.
Biden has another chance to say no — to himself, this time — by withdrawing from the 2024 race. It might not be in character for Biden, but it would be a wise choice for the country.

Biden has in many ways remade himself as president. He is no longer the garrulous glad-hander I met when I first covered Congress more than four decades ago. He’s still an old-time pol, to be sure, but he is now more focused and strategic; he executes policies systematically, at home and abroad. As Franklin Foer writes in “The Last Politician,” a new account of Biden’s presidency, “he will be remembered as the old hack who could.”
Story continues below advertisement

Time is running out. In a month or so, this decision will be cast in stone. It will be too late for other Democrats, including Harris, to test themselves in primaries and see whether they have the stuff of presidential leadership. Right now, there’s no clear alternative to Biden — no screamingly obvious replacement waiting in the wings. That might be the decider for Biden, that there’s seemingly nobody else. But maybe he will trust in democracy to discover new leadership, “in the arena.”

I hope Biden has this conversation with himself about whether to run, and that he levels with the country about it. It would focus the 2024 campaign. Who is the best person to stop Trump? That was the question when Biden decided to run in 2019, and it’s still the essential test of a Democratic nominee today.
 
Last edited:

John Reena

Superstar
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
15,028
Reputation
-965
Daps
44,088
Love Kamala, but if democrats dumb enough to run her, they are gonna lose HORRIBLY. They better get Gavin Newsome. Republicans scared shytLESS of him running.
 

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
18,745
Reputation
5,635
Daps
74,267
Reppin
#ByrdGang
Love Kamala, but if democrats dumb enough to run her, they are gonna lose HORRIBLY. They better get Gavin Newsome. Republicans scared shytLESS of him running.

Running the Governor of California is a liability regardless of how great of a candidate Newsome is. The right will find some way of lampooning Commie-Fornia's regulations, the amount of people leaving the state, etc.

I have been saying for years that Gretchen Whitmer would be the best Biden alternative. Pritzker and Senator Chris Murphy are also viable options. I have to see Josh Shapiro beat someone less disastrous than Doug Mastriano before I put him up there with the rest.
 
Top