Popular WHITE youtuber states that BLACK christians = uncle toms

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,155
Daps
51,652
Philosophically, whats the difference as it relates to The Bible because there are many elements in that people claim are Christian that arent actually in the bible, like purgatory.

Long story short, we practiced the white washed version of christianity
 

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,155
Daps
51,652
trayvonmartinwithdad.jpg

9780465021772_custom-e945067010a2aacbe57cdc62ac603944117084b0-s6-c30.jpg

emmett-till.jpg

tumblr_mhobhz8fwp1qfzdg4o1_400.jpg




Its not about religion...its about believing that GOD is greater than what society has put us though.


This...


Plus the fact that it was mandatory for slaves to be under Christianity.
 

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,155
Daps
51,652
stop with that. there is no "white washed" version of christianity

either you accept Jesus as your savior or you don't. I don't care what color the man who hangs on somones crucifix is

:patrice:

im doing research now and I will get back to you on that
 

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,155
Daps
51,652
Long story short...the video is 100% correct :manny:

Still being apart of a religion that was forced upon you is counter productive.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,051
Reppin
The Deep State
I dont actually.

I believe what i want to believe and give a fukk what anyone else has to say or what they believe in.

Good day sir

Oh ok. You just move the goalposts to whatever religious concept you want instead of validating ANY of it.

Just say you're making shyt up and call it a day. Its better than fooling yourself into thinking you're fooling the god you believe in that you're really as religious as you claim to be...even to that weak extent.
 

Lavish

Its Lavish, hoe
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,552
Reputation
1,035
Daps
18,386
Reppin
Tdot.. till the death of me
Oh ok. You just move the goalposts to whatever religious concept you want instead of validating ANY of it.

Just say you're making shyt up and call it a day. Its better than fooling yourself into thinking you're fooling the god you believe in that you're really as religious as you claim to be...even to that weak extent.

k
 

Peter Parker

Superstar
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
8,391
Reputation
1,155
Daps
29,704
Wrong. Christianity came from Judaism, and there were many tribes who believed in multiple gods, as well as 1 true God. And anyway pantheism is just another form of monotheism; except God is given attributes that are personified by other gods.
I never once mentioned Christianities roots, its pretty obvious that's where it came from. I was correcting the guy who claimed it was an African religion, and when I spoke of Monotheism with a pantheon of demigods I was only using a specific tribe to prove my point, obviously there were various beliefs among pre-colonial africans.

Bet you were feeling awesome for a sec there huh?
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,609
You have no evidence to support this so you shouldn't commit to believing it it.

You created a definition of "higher power" and then skated off to equate that to being a deity over what you create.

That doesn't make any sense without defining what a deity is and you're just playing fast and loose with the language.
Well lets look at the dictionary definition for diety:

1a : the rank or essential nature of a god : divinity

b capitalized : god 1, supreme being
2
: a god or goddess <the deities of ancient Greece>
3
: one exalted or revered as supremely good or powerful

Based on that we would be regarded as powerful to those who are in our simulation or those who are our creations thus making us a diety to them.

You are when you say, "This is what I believe..."

You've gone beyond guessing and speculation.

You've adopted your beliefs on limited evidence...well frankly as you admit...NO evidence.

Thats not rational.

If its a possibility, then say "I don't know"

Stop saying you "believe it"

You don't test beliefs.

You already have committed to it. Thats why its a belief
Well its not out of thin air if its based on ourselves creating and its also focused on a possibility. Its practically based on purely natural events.

You think you're SO fukking cool and different when all you did was steal some vague monotheistic religious claims, stole a popular idea of god, then rebranded it into your own version of a religion and acted like you made the idea up...yet you enact the god of the gaps fallacy to cover your ass in lieu of things you can't explain.

Thats the epitome of moving the goal posts.
I looked at us coming to be and eventually creating things ourselves and my beleif came from that.

Thats what I did and no lie you say can change that.

As for your moving goalposts claim my belief set in stone is:
A higher power exists and intervenes with this world.

Thats my goalpost and it has never been moved. :smile:

Just because you "said" something doesn't make it so.

You're religious.

You created your religious concept and believe in it.

You're not willing to test it and you've admitted to having no evidence to prove it.

Thats the essence of being dogmatic.
Well of course if i say something it makes it so if I have proof in the form of a dictionary. :smile:

I am willing to test it if given a chance. Stop putting words in my mouth.

Therefore your dogmatic claim fails.

You use the word religious too liberally to where you think it applies to places it doesn't. Thats your issue.

again with the dictionary bullshyt

I've given you academic proposals as to why you are IN FACT dogmatic and yet you keep walking around like Websters has your fukking back.

You're a mental midget in this department. You can't defend your belief so you'd MUCH rather roll the dice and hope no one picks up on this massive hole in your rhetorical armor.

Dawg, you're not even using the accepted definition of dogma. :pachaha:
Accepted definition of dogma? Websters dictionary is credible. :smile:

No one cares.

Guesses are just that.

They are to be confirmed if true, and discarded if unproven.

Otherwise, there would be no point in hypothesizing about anything.

Again you're playing fast and loose with language.
The only reason to discard a guess is if its proven false. Open your mind :smile:

Son, are you fukking stupid?

You just said you "aren't claiming" (which is a bullshyt way of saying you don't want to be responsible for what you're saying... which can't happen) that guesses get us closer to the truth...and yet, here you are making more guesses you want to be true.

Otherwise you wouldn't trot them out as not-to-distant possibilities.
I say I am not claiming to get you to realize that I am not claiming my belief as anything close to fact.

My belief is a guess. As a guess unless you prove it wrong it can stand as a possibility.

You're an idiot.

I await your reply where you run back to clinging the dictionary's nuts (which you use the wrong definition), where you keep pretending that you're different from other religious people even though you make religious assertions, and when you keep contradicting yourself, acting like you live in a place of doubt when in fact you have already adopted beliefs that aren't confirmed.

The time to believe things is AFTER you have evidence for believing them.
I can believe things if there isnt any evidence against them as well. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Top