Please move your car so we can keep streets clean, safe & healthy.

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,640
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,360

NYC bans TikTok on city-owned devices​

The ban goes into effect immediately.​

By Makena Kelly, a reporter who covers the politics and power influencing the tech industry. Before joining The Verge in 2018, she covered Congress and breaking news.

Aug 16, 2023, 1:10 PM EDT
A TikTok logo surrounded by jazzy lines and colorful accents

Illustration by Nick Barclay / The Verge

New York City is banning TikTok from city-owned devices and requiring agencies to remove the app within the next 30 days.

The directive issued Wednesday comes after a review by the NYC Cyber Command, which a city official said found that TikTok “posed a security threat to the city’s technical networks.” Starting immediately, city employees are barred from downloading or using the app and accessing TikTok’s website from any city-owned devices.

“While social media is great at connecting New Yorkers with one another and the city, we have to ensure we are always using these platforms in a secure manner,” a New York City Hall spokesperson said in a statement to The Verge Wednesday. “NYC Cyber Command regularly explores and advances proactive measures to keep New Yorkers’ data safe.”

The city cited US Office of Management and Budget guidelines discouraging TikTok’s use on government devices as well as federal legislation banning the app that was passed earlier this year.

For more than three years, Congress has attempted to push through legislation banning TikTok nationwide, alleging that the app and its Chinese owner, ByteDance, can use the data it collects to spy on Americans.

A number of US states have banned TikTok on government-owned devices, but governors have recently tried to go even further. In May, Montana Governor Greg Gianforte signed a bill banning the app within the entire state, making it the first state to do so. Shortly after the bill was signed into law, TikTok users and the company itself sued the state, arguing that it infringed on the free speech rights of Montana citizens.

New York state banned TikTok on state-issued devices back in 2020 through an internal policy barring its download and use on government-owned devices, according to the Times Union earlier this year. The policy still allowed a handful of New York public relations platforms to use the app for marketing purposes.
 

CopiousX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
11,510
Reputation
3,382
Daps
55,912

NYC bans TikTok on city-owned devices​

The ban goes into effect immediately.​

By Makena Kelly, a reporter who covers the politics and power influencing the tech industry. Before joining The Verge in 2018, she covered Congress and breaking news.
It seems kinda weird to me when folks use company devices for personal things. Even outside of TikTok app specifically.

There is no work related function to having that app, unless you are in marketing or public relations . If you wanna have fun, I'm certain your job pays you enough to buy your own devices to download whatever apps you want.

A month ago we had to let go of a guy on our staff who was using his company phone to watch pirated NBA games on janky websites in chrome. The IT department got a hold of his device after it bricked and that phone had all sorts of malware/viruses on it , each compromising the integrity of proprietary company info on the device. His personal use of the phone was completely not worth the time for either the employee in question or the company. :francis:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,640
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,360
It seems kinda weird to me when folks use company devices for personal things. Even outside of TikTok app specifically.

There is no work related function to having that app, unless you are in marketing or public relations . If you wanna have fun, I'm certain your job pays you enough to buy your own devices to download whatever apps you want.

A month ago we had to let go of a guy on our staff who was using his company phone to watch pirated NBA games on janky websites in chrome. The IT department got a hold of his device after it bricked and that phone had all sorts of malware/viruses on it , each compromising the integrity of proprietary company info on the device. His personal use of the phone was completely not worth the time for either the employee in question or the company. :francis:

customer service, companies or any organization don't want to go viral for the wrong reason and they want to be seen as responsive to the customers or public they serve.
 

⠀X ⠀

Geoff
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
16,554
Reputation
4,930
Daps
96,484
Where the fvck am I supposed to move my car? My car has been in the same spot for a week. There is literally no way half the neighborhood can move their cars every other day. I’m glad my neighborhood doesn’t have ASP.
 

CopiousX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
11,510
Reputation
3,382
Daps
55,912
customer service, companies or any organization don't want to go viral for the wrong reason and they want to be seen as responsive to the customers or public they serve.
Can you give me an example of this outside of marketing or public relations? I just cant picture a normal employee needing to be responsive on tiktok.


I would assume the official company tiktok account is held by one sanctioned entity in the corporation (M or PR) . I think that falls outside the scope of customer service. They typically cant access the company twitter account, let alone represent the company outside of a direct call to the company number or message through the company email server.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,640
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,360

New York’s garbage surveillance program is a privacy nightmare

New York has decided to double down with a new bill that would encourage sanitation departments to install more cameras in a futile attempt to combat ‘illegal dumping.’​

p-1-90943255-new-york-garbage-surveillance-program-is.webp
[Photos: Peter Finch/Getty Images; Elvert Barnes/Flickr; Pawel Czerwinski/Unsplash; Claire Dornic/Unsplash]

BY AUSTEN FISHER3 MINUTE READ

New Yorkers just can’t stop talking about the rats.


From Mayor Adams’ appointment of a new City Hall “rat czar” to last week’s launch of a color-coded “rat information portal,” mapping building inspection histories, these unwelcome neighbors are getting nearly everyone’s attention except those who need to pay the most attention: the Department of Sanitation. Instead of focusing on the core work of keeping the rats at bay and the streets safer (from a health perspective), NYC Sanitation Commissioner Jessica Tisch has picked a surprising alternative priority: surveillance.

Garbage piling up on sidewalks and streets has been an issue for New York City, leading to an influx of rats and bad press. Tisch, the former NYPD surveillance czar, seems to want to playact like she still works at 1 Police Plaza, as her response has been trying to surveil trash off the street, rather than actually collecting and disposing of it.

Last year, New York City implemented a pilot program in the Bronx that uses surveillance cameras to watch for “illegal dumping.” Despite this program, the city’s sidewalks are reportedly 1.6% dirtier than last year. Undeterred, Albany has decided to double down with a new bill that would encourage municipal sanitation departments throughout the state to install more cameras in a futile attempt to combat “dumping.”


Two more local New York City bills have similar provisions. One would install cameras on all street sweepers to report parking, stopping, or standing violations. The other would install surveillance cameras to identify anyone throwing household trash in a public litter basket.

The proposed legislation may seem innocuous, but consider that when Tisch was head of NYPD’s department of information technology, it was notorious for secretly using surveillance technology on New Yorkers. Yet, for all that surveillance tech, New Yorkers didn’t feel any safer. In fact, crime was reported up 4.1% this year, with a 14.9% increase in felony assault . . . despite this uptick in police technology.
“Illegal dumping” is just a drop in the bucket of New York’s sanitation issues; legally tossed trash makes up the majority of garbage on NYC’s curbs. This year, the Department of Sanitation allocated $1.4 million of this year’s budget, and nearly $400,000 annually thereafter, to expanded camera enforcement in sanitation. Additional funding has been allocated for sanitation surveillance via discretionary funding, which allocates money to non-profits to provide social services. What community is served by watching waste? Surveilling public trash-tossing in order to nail errant scofflaws (of whom there aren’t a lot) will do nothing to reduce the amount of garbage on city streets.

Instead of fixing legitimate sanitation issues or even ensuring new pick-up initiatives are effective, the Adams administration seems bent on wasting taxpayers’ money on the techno-solutionist boondoggles of expensive cameras on the City’s streets and the Rat Information Portal.

The directive from the mayor’s office to Tisch is clear: criminalize and punish. In fact, she’s on record saying, “The Sanitation Department is going to catch you and . . . you can be locked up . . . get a $4,000 summons, and your vehicle will be impounded. It’s not a question of if, [but] when.” This attempt of the mayor’s office to spend millions surveilling and criminalizing New Yorkers seems to take a page out of the NYPD playbook (and that of police departments around the country): criminalizing poverty and continuing cycles of systemic inequity.

The street sweeper bill mandates reporting “to the commissioner of finance and the police commissioner” for enforcement. This would result in more parking tickets and fines as police supplement the city budget. The public litter basket bill explicitly states that law enforcement could use footage collected by the Department of Sanitation. The New York Senate legislation doesn’t even define “illegal dumping,” making the law ripe for selective enforcement by the NYPD.


If these bills pass, law enforcement would have the ability to use the Department of Sanitation’s surveillance camera footage however they please. The proposed legislation has no limitations on the retention or use of collected footage. Nothing in these bills stops Jessica Tisch from handing over camera footage to the NYPD, which would welcome a network of cameras to implement Mayor Adams’ experimental facial recognition technology initiative.

New York legislators must vote no on these “garbage” bills. They will punish poverty and further facilitate discrimination against Black New Yorkers and other communities of color. This legislation is predatory, expensive, and ineffective. Tell Albany to toss it in a landfill.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,640
Reputation
7,896
Daps
148,360

New York Rolling Out $1,000 Public Trash Cans Intended to Keep Rats at Bay​

Sanitation Dept. posted images of the new bins, which appear to have vents too small for rodents to crawl through unlike current mesh ones​

Published 09/18/23 03:04 PM ET|Updated 09/18/23 05:20 PM ET
Monique Merrill

New York Rolling Out $1,000 Public Trash Cans Intended to Keep Rats at Bay
image

New York To Roll Out Pricey, ‘Highly Specialized’ Mesh Garbage CansNYC Department of Sanitation (2)

They say one man’s trash is man’s treasure. In this case, it’s the trash can that is the treasure of New York City’s sanitation department.

Dubbed the “Better Bin,” the city’s new trash cans are expected to hit the streets in the next few weeks, Sanitation Commissioner Jessica Tisch told Gothamist.

While the cans may appear to be standard, undistinguished receptacles, the design is in fact “rat resistant,” according to the city. The bins are also designed to be more difficult for “public misuse,” and easier for staff to empty.

The bins were designed by Group Project, the winners of a city-sponsored trash can redesign competition four years ago. The lead designer of the company, Colin Kelly, told Gothamist that manufacturing the cans, which have a vented design that replaces the old mesh wire ones, was a “highly specialized process” relying on injection molding.

The cans were intended to be rolled out around a month ago, but hiccups in production delayed that initiative. The cans have three major components: a metal and concrete stand that partially covers one side of the receptacle, a mesh liner made of high-density polyethylene, and a bisected lid that sits atop the structure.

“It's easier to make the stand and the metal portion [of the trash can] than it is to make the liner,” Kelly said.

Read More
The cans are expected to replace the green metal mesh cans seen around the streets of New York, a design that has been used by the city since the 1930s, the sanitation department told Gothamist. The cans are heavy and difficult to empty and are something of a haven for trash-loving rats.

Tisch said replacing the cans was “a priority” and aims to replace the city’s 23,000 trash cans over the next several years as the budget allows for, the outlet reported. Each one costs around $1,000, according to Gothamist.
 
Top