Pete Buttigieg is a failure at the U.S. Department of Transportation - UPDATE: He's improved!!

[Pressure]

My reading comprehension is fine, you’re the one in here being a cocksucker and as I said before since you also can't fukking read bytch



Mush Brained fukking c*nt

Let’s actually ignore the actual voting in that town to make some shyt argument.

I hope Florida gets the same treatment when these hurricanes fukk y’all up

 

[the cac mamba]

What do you do?

he gets home from his corporate job in desantis' florida, makes passive aggressive comments to his roommate about the dishes in the sink, then gets to furiously whining about capitalism on the internet

one of the fakest militants out

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

Let’s actually ignore the actual voting in that town to make some shyt argument.

I hope Florida gets the same treatment when these hurricanes fukk y’all up

I live in a landlocked area as does my family and we'll be just fine. I hope you get a hit by a fukking car and turned into a god damn vegetable

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

he gets home from his corporate job in desantis' florida, makes passive aggressive comments to his roommate about the dishes in the sink, then gets to furiously whining about capitalism on the internet

one of the fakest militants out

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Speaking of shytty reading comprehension, I didn't say jack shyt about Pete, I made clear from the beginning that i was responding to the women's complaints about the EPA, so wtf is this troll talking about?

I know thread is about DoT, but needs to be pointed out how much of a letdown the Biden EPA is from that article. I remember some years ago realizing that the EPA has been primarily a corporate servant even in Democratic administrations. Look at how the Clinton Administration handled Dupont or what Obama's Administration did to Tennie White. They aren't shyt.

The premise was the recourse wanted by the woman your quoted had nothing to do with what the DOT handles.
You guys are fukking clown shoes.

The woman is quite literally complaining about the EPA and y’all talking about Pete. Like I said, you aren’t actually here to address her actual concerns. You’re just here to do your regulation anticapitalism song and dance and Pete is your target because that’s what your podcaster told you.

Liar, you are the ONLY person who has been talking about Pete since that article was posted. Your claim is the exact opposite of reality.

You're quite literally just making shyt up so you can bury the actual issues we discussed as deeply as possible.

 

[Pressure]

I remember you championing that meme about the condition of the rail as proof that it was on Pete only to learn that it was an old outdated picture.

Liar, you are the ONLY person who has been talking about Pete since that article was posted. Your claim is the exact opposite of reality.

You're quite literally just making shyt up so you can bury the actual issues we discussed as deeply as possible.

This is a thread about Pete you fukking imbecile.

 

[mastermind]

I didn't say jack shyt about Pete,

No one brought up Buttigieg, except the video I linked which talked about DOT rules on train safety—which we know he didn’t watch. Most of the video critiques the media coverage, several administrations, corporate power and got accounts from residents.

I put it in here because it was about the train derailment, but it wasn’t specifically about Buttigieg, and no poster bought him up.

I only put it here because I couldn’t find the train derailment thread.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I remember you championing that meme about the condition of the rail as proof that it was on Pete only to learn that it was an old outdated picture.

Liar. I don't even know what meme you're talking about and I'm certain I've never posted such a meme. I don't think I even posted in the derailment thread.

You got caught lying when you claimed we've all been talking about Pete, now you're gonna double down with another lie?

This is a thread about Pete you fukking imbecile.

Considering how often you derail threads to discuss a completely different topic, it's kinda shocking that you now want to pretend that every comment in a Pete thread must be about Pete.

You lied and claimed we were talking about Pete. Now you're just trying to deflect from being caught in a lie.

No one brought up Buttigieg, except the video I linked which talked about DOT rules on train safety—which we know he didn’t watch. Most of the video critiques the media coverage, several administrations, corporate power and got accounts from residents.

I put it in here because it was about the train derailment, but it wasn’t specifically about Buttigieg, and no poster bought him up.

I only put it here because I couldn’t find the train derailment thread.

He's a shill, he didn't even pretend to be informed on the issues or desire a serious conversation on them. He argues at the level of stan wars in entertainment forums.

 

[mastermind]

He's a shill, he didn't even pretend to be informed on the issues or desire a serious conversation on them. He argues at the level of stan wars in entertainment forums.

As a person who is from the DC area, I’ve seen a bunch of people who he aspires to be. They aren’t interested in anything but their own political success.

 

[Pressure]

Not everything is an exercise in academia.

You’ve been pontificating the ills of society on this site for a decade with nothing of value to show for it.

You two think every topic requires debate and that just isn’t the case.

 

[mastermind]

You two think every topic requires debate and that just isn’t the case.

Their wasn’t a debate until you re-entered.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

You’ve been pontificating the ills of society on this site for a decade with nothing of value to show for it.

You two think every topic requires debate and that just isn’t the case.

Goddamn, now I'm being responsible for failing to singlehandedly solve society's ills via Coli posts.

I'm not sure who you think I was debating. We were sharing well-documented stories of corporate and government malfeasance, all of us in agreement with the residents quoted in the initial story, and everyone agreed on the facts and causes.

There was no debate until you came in here to stir up trouble, then when you got your ass handed to you, you started bytching "not everything needs to be a debate".

Looks like yet another bad faith argument on your part.

 

[the cac mamba]

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I already debunked this dumb idea two weeks ago the last time a right-winger posted it:

2023's average new car price is $49,500, whereas you can buy a new Tesla for $40,000. So it's actually cheaper than the average new car.

You can get a Hyundai Kona Electric for $33,550, a Mini Cooper SE electric for $29,000, a Nissan Leaf for $28,000, a Chevy Bolt EUV for $27,800, or a regular Chevy Bolt for $26,500. And those will keep getting cheaper every year. The cheapest new EVs are only a few thousand more than the cheapest gas-powered cars, and you'll make up the difference in gas savings within a year or two.

 

[the cac mamba]

I already debunked this dumb idea two weeks ago the last time a right-winger posted it:

but can you buy a 10 thousand dollar electric car in '23, like poor families do with gas cars, you sanctimonious dikkhead? they easy to find?

i can't believe you just literally did what the meme said