fukk out of here. This shyt is jammed up because republicans are playing politics.
I'm referring to the people actually involved, who in that excerpt gave three different ways that the EPA has let them down.
Honest question - before I highlighted the EPA, was this an important issue for you that you've researched intensively and determined for a fact that their complaints are incorrect? Di you know more about the house-to-house response than the people involved? Or are you just reflexively defensive of the current government?
If this is in response to the other breh’s comments on the EPA….even if the initial incident is due to poor governance and deregulation by republicans…..we’re 6 months into this, the response is garbage. Just like the response was/is garbage with Flint.
It’s like you’re absolving a doctor of not doing or poorly doing his job in fixing your stab wounds, because he aint the one that stabbed you in the first place. (Even tho he might’ve helped stabbed you in this context)
And it goes back much further than Flint.
I first got exposed to just how bad the EPA is from the Dupont case. Dupont was openly discharging extremely toxic chemicals straight into a man's farm. The details sound like a horror movie:
‘‘I’ve taken two dead deer and two dead cattle off this ripple,’’ Tennant says in voice-over. ‘‘The blood run out of their noses and out their mouths. ... They’re trying to cover this stuff up. But it’s not going to be covered up, because I’m going to bring it out in the open for people to see.’’
The video shows a large pipe running into the creek, discharging green water with bubbles on the surface. ‘‘This is what they expect a man’s cows to drink on his own property,’’ Wilbur says. ‘‘It’s about high time that someone in the state department of something-or-another got off their cans.’’
At one point, the video cuts to a skinny red cow standing in hay. Patches of its hair are missing, and its back is humped — a result, Wilbur speculates, of a kidney malfunction. Another blast of static is followed by a close-up of a dead black calf lying in the snow, its eye a brilliant, chemical blue. ‘‘One hundred fifty-three of these animals I’ve lost on this farm,’’ Wilbur says later in the video. ‘‘Every veterinarian that I’ve called in Parkersburg, they will not return my phone calls or they don’t want to get involved. Since they don’t want to get involved, I’ll have to dissect this thing myself. ... I’m going to start at this head.’’
The video cuts to a calf’s bisected head. Close-ups follow of the calf’s blackened teeth (‘‘They say that’s due to high concentrations of fluoride in the water that they drink’’), its liver, heart, stomachs, kidneys and gall bladder. Each organ is sliced open, and Wilbur points out unusual discolorations — some dark, some green — and textures. ‘‘I don’t even like the looks of them,’’ he says. ‘‘It don’t look like anything I’ve been into before.’’
Bilott watched the video and looked at photographs for several hours. He saw cows with stringy tails, malformed hooves, giant lesions protruding from their hides and red, receded eyes; cows suffering constant diarrhea, slobbering white slime the consistency of toothpaste, staggering bowlegged like drunks. Tennant always zoomed in on his cows’ eyes. ‘‘This cow’s done a lot of suffering,’’ he would say, as a blinking eye filled the screen.
‘‘This is bad,’’ Bilott said to himself. ‘‘There’s something really bad going on here.’’
Yet when the EPA was forced to get involved, all they did was help Dupont with the cover-up in the most comical, embarrassing fashion.
Bilott filed a federal suit against DuPont in the summer of 1999 in the Southern District of West Virginia. In response, DuPont’s in-house lawyer, Bernard Reilly, informed him that DuPont and the E.P.A. would commission a study of the property, conducted by three veterinarians chosen by DuPont and three chosen by the E.P.A. Their report did not find DuPont responsible for the cattle’s health problems. The culprit, instead, was poor husbandry: ‘‘poor nutrition, inadequate veterinary care and lack of fly control.’’ In other words, the Tennants didn’t know how to raise cattle; if the cows were dying, it was their own fault.
That's 1999, the Clinton EPA. How the fukk were they that ambivalent in response to such an obvious crisis? In the end, it turned out that PFOAs hasn't just been killing cattle, they'd been responsible for killing tens of thousands of people and sickening millions more.
The EPA (under Bush, ironically), finally responded after a massive pressure campaign from the lawyer in question. They were fined $16.5 million, or approximately 2% of one year of PFOA profits. No executive at Dupont faced criminal charges, despite them having known for decades that the substance was destructive to human health.
Why are certain people so blind to this constant history of pro-corporate bullshyt?