Paul Pierce attempts to explain why Lebron isn’t a top 5 player

mindgawn

Pro
Bushed
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
732
Reputation
166
Daps
1,102
Reppin
NULL


White chocolate, Al Harrington, Trae Young, Kendrick Perkins have all recently come out and said Bron is the Goat. As the years go by he'll have more players in his corner.

Nah, saying Lebron is the Goat is like saying Dwight Howard was Goat in Orlando when he played for corners ball, had all the stats, body, and IQ to kick to shooters when he got double teamed.

Man if these Lebron Jerkyboys don't get the kcuF outta here! Dude cool but anybody with confidence in their game ain't content with standing around waiting on duke.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,436
Reputation
6,105
Daps
44,928
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Higher peak dominance that resulted in how many championships outside of outrightly having the most talented team in the NBA (see Miami 2011, 2012, 2013) or a top 3 most talented roster (see Cleveland 2015, 2016, 2017) and yet he still has less rings than Duncan?

More decorated accross the board : Duncan - 3 Finals MVP's , 5 Rings, 13 x all NBA, 15 x all NBA defense (including 8 x all NBA first team defense), I just don't see Lebron being more decorated.

Better elevator of talent : Like Bosh? Like Love? Lebron's style of play only elevates him, it doesn't elevate anyone else. Players standing in the corner to catch and shoot is not elevating them. Also, it hasn't resulted in championships. When Lebron won his 3 rings, which of his teammates did he elevate?

Better all round game: Lebron might be better offensively, but Duncan is much better defensively. Jordan is one of the greatest defensive players in the history of the game, a game altering rim protector and is one of the best shot blockers in NBA history (5th all time in blocked shots)

Lebron has benefited a lot from playing in a Weak East (in his entire East career, only beating 10 50+ win teams and 5 of those 10 won less than 54 games).

Lebron has also benefited from being on the most talented or top 3 most talented roster for the last decade and has had the luxury of being able to handpick his teammates. A priviledge other equally as talented players like Hakeem Olajuwon never had (he wasted his prime in an awful franchise and won championships (94 and 95) or reached the NBA Finals (86) the instant he had some good players.

Anyway, got to go sleep. We can continue this another time.

Aside from all that subjective shyt you said, like I said Duncan has a more than arguable case; so does LeBron. Yall just gotta quit the "LeBron has no case" against any player shyt; he has a case vs any GOAT-level player period because he himself is a GOAT as well...
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
30,539
Reputation
4,401
Daps
103,202
Duncan
MJ
Magic
Wilt
Kareem


Yeah, Lebron is not top 5
Duncan over MJ? Bold

timmy is top 5 to be also. had prolly the best 19 years in nba. from start to finish. never missed the playoffs, and was always competing. A lot of teams will make the playoffs but they have no shot at winning a title. Not the spurs in the Duncan era
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
67,918
Reputation
10,394
Daps
229,230
“They either helped build up an organization or continued a tradition.”

Bron didn’t help build up the Cavs? And what tradition did they have? :russ:
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,896
Reputation
611
Daps
13,962
Aside from all that subjective shyt you said, like I said Duncan has a more than arguable case; so does LeBron. Yall just gotta quit the "LeBron has no case" against any player shyt; he has a case vs any GOAT-level player period because he himself is a GOAT as well...
He has no case against Jordan. He might have a case against the others but having a case doesn't make you consensus number 2. Do you believe that?

Also he can't be a GOAT himself is Jordan is clearly, demontrably by every measure a better player. I personally don't think its close between Jordan and anyone else. If anything, the passing of time undersells Jordan despite the fact he's universally considered the GOAT.

Lebron can be vice GOAT or arguably 2nd with 4 or 5 others. And so can Tim Duncan if you really stretch it. But Tim and the others don't have the media campaigning so it doesn't seem that way. And your initial post you were trying to make a case for why Lebron > Duncan but even you don't think its so convincing.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,436
Reputation
6,105
Daps
44,928
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
He has no case against Jordan. He might have a case against the others but having a case doesn't make you consensus number 2. Do you believe that?

Also he can't be a GOAT himself is Jordan is clearly, demontrably by every measure a better player. I personally don't think its close between Jordan and anyone else. If anything, the passing of time undersells Jordan despite the fact he's universally considered the GOAT.

Lebron can be vice GOAT or arguably 2nd with 4 or 5 others. And so can Tim Duncan if you really stretch it. But Tim and the others don't have the media campaigning so it doesn't seem that way. And your initial post you were trying to make a case for why Lebron > Duncan but even you don't think its so convincing.

Oh no I'm definitely convinced LeBron is greater than Duncan, but that's not a debate I really need to have. I don't need to win every argument about it, I'm cool saying they both have an argument as greater than the other, because they both do---->but I do think Bron's is stronger...

Whether LeBron is #2 or not, I don't know. He's the greatest player I've ever seen. I recognize Jordan is #1 by popular opinion, my personal belief is it's hard to say someone is the greatest over every other GOAT because many GOATs don't play each other, so you can only say how guys were in their eras. But I ain't bothered by Jordan supporters, doesn't change that LeBron is the best I've seen and doesn't change the supporting metrics that put him eye-to-eye with Jordan...

They'll never get to play within the same era to make a definitive determination, so it is what it is. I've given this topic a LOT more play since the doc came out, than I gave it prior, and I wanted my points heard on the subject, but even I'm about done with it. It's all good with me any way someone wants it, cats on here just go way over the top pretending LeBron isn't worthy of GOAT discussion...

GOAT talk can never be open and shut by anyone, because Bill played in an era they didn't issue certain awards like FMVP and DPOY that would enhance his legacy even more, and played at a time that no one alive under the age of 65 can definitively say he wasn't better than Mike, Bron, or whoever, yet we do it anyway; dude will always have more rings than anybody, and he ain't a consensus #1. It's all subjective, the more people can understand that, the fewer dumb hot takes we'll hear...

10s: LeBron
00s: Duncan/Kobe/Shaq
90s: Mike
80s: Magic/Bird
70s: Kareem
60s: Bill/Wilt

You really gotta break it down by era, and the greatest players of each era all have a case, period. Seems like every other era there's a guy who rises head and shoulders above the rest; every other era there's multiple guys who can stake claim to best player...

As it is in 2020, these are the 10 guys with the argument for GOAT. People can put them in any order they want, but they are the 10 guys with legitimate arguments and however they are numbered, is subject to personal biases (who you feel is better based on what you value), so it doesn't even matter how they are numbered. We know who the best were by era, and we know at this point in time ain't nobody BUT these 10 guys in the discussion...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,896
Reputation
611
Daps
13,962
Oh no I'm definitely convinced LeBron is greater than Duncan, but that's not a debate I really need to have. I don't need to win every argument about it, I'm cool saying they both have an argument as greater than the other, because they both do---->but I do think Bron's is stronger...

Whether LeBron is #2 or not, I don't know. He's the greatest player I've ever seen. I recognize Jordan is #1 by popular opinion, my personal belief is it's hard to say someone is the greatest over every other GOAT because many GOATs don't play each other, so you can only say how guys were in their eras. But I ain't bothered by Jordan supporters, doesn't change that LeBron is the best I've seen and doesn't change the supporting metrics that put him eye-to-eye with Jordan...

They'll never get to play within the same era to make a definitive determination, so it is what it is. I've given this topic a LOT more play since the doc came out, than I gave it prior, and I wanted my points heard on the subject, but even I'm about done with it. It's all good with me any way someone wants it, cats on here just go way over the top pretending LeBron isn't worthy of GOAT discussion...

.


(1) Okay fair enough

(2) There is no advanced stat or metric that isn't cumulative that suggests Lebron is "eye to eye" with Jordan. Never mind the fact that PER and Box plus minus both put Jordan ahead inthe regular (despite accounting for his Wizards years as a damn 40 year old man) . And of course in the Post season also.

VORP (Value over replacement player) and Win Shares are both cumulative stats that favor Lebron because he's played more games and for longer. They are added to each other not averaged out.

Besides, no one knows the constructs in which these advanced stats compliment for, how something like quality of teammates or minutes played for example impact them. The advanced stats will have you believe Chris Paul is the best point guard ever when he's nowhere near that. He wasn't even better than Kevin Johnson was. The only advanced stats I like are GameScore and True shooting because they are less subjective even though the latter has its problems, using it across eras.

So , if we then stick to the 5 basic statistical categories, Jordan is a better player across the board , using GameScore:

All you have to do is go to basketball reference and use "GameScore" of "40" which shows all time great statistical games: https://basketball-reference.com/play-index/pgl_finder.cgi?request=1&match=career&year_min=1947&year_max=2020&is_playoffs=E&age_min=0&age_max=99&season_start=1&season_end=-1&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&c2stat=game_score&c2comp=gt&c2val=40&order_by=pts…

Jordan is miles ahead of Lebron. Gamescore explained : https://nbastuffer.com/analytics101/game-score/

Being as objective as possible, there is no player in the modern era of basketball who is even in the same stratosphere in filling up the box score, CONTRARY to popular belief that some Lebron fans wrongly think its him. Him being the best "all round" and all this junk.

So Jordan is ahead in box score, he is ahead in non-cumulative catch all advanced stats like PER and Box plus/minus. He is a better offensive and defensive player. In his first 9 years he already surpassed all of Lebron's entire career.

There is also the fact that Jordan played in an era that should have limited his statistics for his positon but he still put up crazy numbers. I can't even imagine what he'll do in today's NBA of no handchecking, little resistance for perimeter players attacking the basket, incredibly spacing and the new defensive 3 second violation rule which even makes it easier.

What else is there to say my man? I think its obvious Jordan was comfortably a better player. Have a good night.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,635
Reputation
22,469
Daps
587,300
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Magic and Kareem absolutely built the Lakers into what they are today. People are crazy to say otherwise. The 1980's saw substantial growth in the NBA on the back of the Celtics and Showtime Lakers. The Lakers became THE team to watch.. Hollywood celebrities flocked in droves... it was not like that prior to the 80s..

How is that an argument?

Bill Russell was the first modern NBA star besides Wilt. The NBA prior to Russell and Wilt is not even discussed... They ushered in an era of the NBA where the sport placed itself among football and baseball in America.

Again.. not a debate.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,821
Daps
84,257
Reppin
NULL
Cape for a horrible analyst brehs

they don’t love you like that :mjpls:

here’s some truths for y’all :mjlol:



Pierce is one of the best NBA players in the last 20 years. He has the right to think he was better than Wade and Klay. He also competed against LeBron and has the right to feel he is being overrated by the media.

Him picking the Celtics in 2019 after Game 1 is irrelevant. Lots of folks overreact to the first game in a playoff series. Lets not act like 70% of people weren't saying the same shyt after the Celtics won Game 1 on the road by 20+ points.
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,035
Reputation
8,207
Daps
194,480
Reppin
BX, NYC
The advanced stats will have you believe Chris Paul is the best point guard ever when he's nowhere near that. He wasn't even better than Kevin Johnson was.
LeBron’s PER and box plus minus are extremely close neck and neck with Jordan. Those Wizards Jordan seasons (also you Mike stans try to pretend they didn’t happen, no it is part of his career lol) didn’t hurt much and LeBron is projected to play until he’s 40 so his will take a small hit too. But fukk that Mike and LeBron thing for a second.

How the fukk is Kevin Johnson better than Chris Paul?

What the hell did Kevin Johnson do better on a basketball court than CP3?

A guy that made 3 fukking All-Star teams is better than the Point God? A guy that had 5-6 good seasons is better than a guy who is still well above average in year 14. CP3 has as many damn top 5 MVP voting seasons as KJ has All-NBA’s.

He’s not a better passer, he’s not a better shooter, he’s not a better dribbler, he’s not a better defender, he’s not a better leader. Johnson is significantly more turnover prone. His peak seasons are nowhere near Paul.

God damn you’re fukking W.O.A.T.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,635
Reputation
22,469
Daps
587,300
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Him picking the Celtics in 2019 after Game 1 is irrelevant. Lots of folks overreact to the first game in a playoff series. Lets not act like 70% of people weren't saying the same shyt after the Celtics won Game 1 on the road by 20+ points.

Coli posters have no room to talk about being "reactionary" they say shyt is over after the first quarter of the first game....
 
Top