Parkland, FL School Shooting Possibly Still Active

moniemane

Pro
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
1,060
Reputation
-120
Daps
1,794
Last days......as a Jehovah's witness I'm not surprised and expect this to continue get worse until the day of Jehovah and his war of armaggeddon.
 
Last edited:

Jalether

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
10,564
Reputation
1,911
Daps
38,965
NRA: crickets

Republicans: "thoughts and prayers" "It's too early to talk about gun control" "stop politicizing this tragedy"

Gun loving fakkits: "Guns don't kill, humans do" " The answer is more guns not less" "2nd ammendment"

In the end nothing gets done and the mass shooting and gun related deaths pile on

wash, rinse and repeat.
 

Supper

All Star
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
2,920
Reputation
2,855
Daps
12,345
Can you post those in depth analysis - those detailed reports, already?

Yes, they're called the FBI UCR(unified crime report), the British Home Office PRC, The US NCVS, and the UK CSEW the most up to date official primary sources available from which I've gathered all of the statistics I used to compare the violent crime rate using the same parameters from the very source you cited, save for the blatantly misleading burglary stats, to give an uptodate like-like comparison of crime in the UK to the US. Have you not been listening this entire time?

The rate of rape, robbery, and burglary were all higher in the UK in 2016, than in the US, when using police reported statistics(UCR/Home Office). The rates of assault are also higher in the UK when using each country's victimization surveys(NCVS/CSEW).



You used the Daily Mail? You're full of shyt. That you would use that link tells me everything I need to know about you and your motives. They're also using Ben Swann's debunked bullshyt.
This makes all your pompousness even more hilarious. :mjlol:

You seem to really be personalizing this discussion much more than is appropriate for a male to do with another male stranger over the net. You'll have to take your chronic obsession with this Ben guy, your personal issues with my supposed secret motives that you're on a quest to uncover, and your displeasure with my 'pompous' tone up with a professional, as I'm not the in a position to help you deal with those issues unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-155
Daps
65,109
Reppin
NULL
Mental health is not what makes America uniquely vulnerable to gun violence. As my colleague Dylan Matthews explained, people with mental illnesses are more likely to be victims, not perpetrators, of violence. And Michael Stone, a psychiatrist at Columbia University who maintains a database of mass shooters, wrote in a 2015 analysisthat only 52 out of the 235 killers in the database, or about 22 percent, were mentally ill. “The mentally ill should not bear the burden of being regarded as the ‘chief’ perpetrators of mass murder,” Stone concluded. Other research has backed this up

Trump’s Florida shooting speech was one giant lie by omission

Americans have a gun problem.

America has a....

Drug problem

Police Problem

Jobs Problem

Corrupt Government Problem

Poor Problem

Mental/Physical health Problem

Spending Problem

Education Problem

Act like guns are the only thing we should worrying about here.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
22,214
Reputation
7,630
Daps
93,741
Reppin
Chase U
Yes, they're called the FBI UCR(unified crime report), the British Home Office PRC, The US NCVS, and the UK CSEW the most up to date official primary sources available from which I've gathered all of the statistics I used to compare the violent crime rate using the same parameters, save for the blatantly misleading burglary stats, to create a like-like comparison of crime in the UK to the US as in the source you posted.

The rate of rape, robbery, and burglary were all higher in the UK in 2016, than in the US, when using police reported statistics(UCR/Home Office). The rates of assault are also higher in the UK when using each country's victimization surveys(NCVS/CSEW).





You seem to really be personalizing this discussion much more than is appropriate for a male to do with another male stranger over the net. You'll have to take your unhealthy obsession with this Ben guy, your personal issues with my supposed secret motives that you're on a quest to uncover, and your displeasure with my 'pompous' tone up with a professional, as I'm not the in a position to help you deal with those issues unfortunately.
Nope. You came into this thread making boisterous claims and putting yourself above everyone - you were railing against anti-intellectualism and turning your nose up at simple hot-takes. You fancy yourself a free-thinker, unbound by any political influence, but the content of your posts say otherwise. Even now you ignore the point multiple posters are making to push your own agenda - using the same means you condemn others for using. I mean, what is that?

And look, some machismo. And some questioning my state of mind. What's missing? The in depth analysis - those reports - that you referenced in your first post. A misleading reddit post doesn't count. A link to the daily mail doesn't count, either.
 
Top