Parkland, FL School Shooting Possibly Still Active

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
79,737
Reputation
24,194
Daps
361,156
I'm just correcting your original clam that tanks are not legal to own by posting proof that vehicles defined as tanks are not illegal to own. No need for you to move the goal post by saying these kinda tanks are legal because....
It’s not moving goalposts. It’s common sense.

Just like you can’t own a live land mine.
Or, I don’t know, a grenade.

The point is, there are weapons we have decided are not needed/allowed at the civilian level. At least not without some level of regulation. Often HEAVY regulation.

At its most extreme level, it’s why Billy Bob doesn’t get to own a nuclear weapon.

The actual example does not matter. That’s semantics. We are talking about drawing a line.
 

Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
12,574
Reputation
4,256
Daps
74,038
Reppin
NULL
It’s not moving goalposts. It’s common sense.

Just like you can’t own a live land mine.
Or, I don’t know, a grenade.

The point is, there are weapons we have decided are not needed/allowed at the civilian level. At least not without some level of regulation. Often HEAVY regulation.

At its most extreme level, it’s why Billy Bob doesn’t get to own a nuclear weapon.

The actual example does not matter. That’s semantics. We are talking about drawing a line.

Was this not your original post?

Lines are drawn all the time.
It's why pistols are legal to own and tanks are not.

It's harder to get Sudafed than an AR-15. If you don't think there's a problem there, you are just being willfully obtuse.

Stay on topic
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
79,737
Reputation
24,194
Daps
361,156
Was this not your original post?



Stay on topic
I am on topic.
You’re arguing semantics.

That, or you’re incapable of reading between the lines.

At the end of the day you have to agree that lines need to be drawn. Or you should come out and say that all weapons, regardless of grade, should be open to purchase by anyone.
 

Supper

All Star
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
2,920
Reputation
2,855
Daps
12,345
FYI......... strawmaning about crew manned and/or indiscriminate area weapons like tanks, artillery, explosives and machine guns that obviously have little to no use for personal self defense being banned for civilians, does nothing for your case about why individual discriminant weapons such as semi-automatic assault rifles should be banned or restricted for civilian use as they're clearly not in the same class as the former, whatsoever.
 
Last edited:

Pimpdaddy

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
5,134
Reputation
1,560
Daps
18,881
Reppin
#GMB
2.bild.jpg
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
30,893
Reputation
4,572
Daps
102,144
Lines are drawn all the time.
It's why pistols are legal to own and tanks are not.

It's harder to get Sudafed than an AR-15. If you don't think there's a problem there, you are just being willfully obtuse.
ARs are just popular, but theyre no differrnt than most other rifles that
 

Wiles

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2015
Messages
15,824
Reputation
1,365
Daps
51,305
Dude didn't say ban guns he just pointed out a fact. You cacs and your, I need my automatic rifle!!! fukkin pussies.
Yea imma cac for wanting a gun. You sound like the p*ssy . ban gunz because I trust the goverment so much that criminals will also follow the laws. fukk outta here p*ssy
 

Wiles

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2015
Messages
15,824
Reputation
1,365
Daps
51,305
I am on topic.
You’re arguing semantics.

That, or you’re incapable of reading between the lines.

At the end of the day you have to agree that lines need to be drawn. Or you should come out and say that all weapons, regardless of grade, should be open to purchase by anyone.
Ban guns see of outlaws follow. I say ban guns so I can rob punk fakkits like you easy.
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
37,274
Reputation
5,447
Daps
121,456
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
Yea imma cac for wanting a gun. You sound like the p*ssy . ban gunz because I trust the goverment so much that criminals will also follow the laws. fukk outta here p*ssy
Who said to ban guns u fagget cac? Lets just not have any laws since criminals don't follow them. I'm sure u need your 150 guns for sporting and target practice... U probably the next piece of shyt to snap and go on a shooting spree cuz u ain't had p*ssy in 10 years with your cac criminal don't follow laws talking points..same comment I see white people make all the time when this shyt happens...obama wouldve took our guns p*ssy ass white boy.
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
79,737
Reputation
24,194
Daps
361,156
ARs are just popular, but theyre no differrnt than most other rifles that
They’re effective killing machines that no civilian needs for anything.

Let’s not act like people are dropping 20 people at a time with bolt action rifles. And let’s not act like people need 600 rounds a second to hunt an elk.

There’s this paranoia in the gun owner community that somehow if one weapon is banned that all your guns will be taken away. That has always been a lie used by the NRA and politicians to rile their base (and often drive up gun sales).

But perhaps more importantly than getting into a debate about whether ARs should be banned is the gun lobby’s refusal to even consider thorough regulations and background checks on who can get a weapon.

Yeah. I can hear you all now. This won’t stop all gun violence.

It’s not about stopping all gun violence. It’s about curtailing it.
 
Top