Parkland, FL School Shooting Possibly Still Active

Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
12,560
Reputation
4,254
Daps
73,966
Reppin
NULL
Lines are drawn all the time.
It's why pistols are legal to own and tanks are not.

It's harder to get Sudafed than an AR-15. If you don't think there's a problem there, you are just being willfully obtuse.
Who told you tanks are illegal to own?
 

Straw Hat Luffy

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
18,229
Reputation
3,579
Daps
64,289
As someone who attends college. I be shook as fukk.
I be feeling bad but then at the same time I be pissed. There's an awkward dude who obviously has lacks the mental compatibility of social skills that ruins the class for everyone. I be thinking holy shyt they just accept anyone and put everyone in the same class.

I be shook his awkwardness going to break him one day and he gonna snap.
Dude been getting real tense with the professor and he just be staying strange things.
I know he can't help it.

But it pisses me off. And with shyt like this can you fukking blame me. It's always these types of dudes doing it.

It's never a nikka in his prime smashing hoes and a guy with a bunch of buddies he hangs with weekly.
 

Supper

All Star
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
2,920
Reputation
2,855
Daps
12,344
Here's something far more detailed:

Another glaring flaw in this source aside from it being way out of date, which may or may not be deliberately deceptive, is how it only grabs the number from the DOMESTIC burglaries, only a subset of the total burglaries in the UK, and compared it to the total burglaries in the US, and gave no reason as to why or even indication that it was done that way, but if you check the source for that figure(258,148), you'll see that it only represents the domestic burglaries of dwellings in the UK, where as the total burglaries in the UK were 522,640, which would actually make the UK's rate(931.6 per 100,000) of burglary much higher than that of the US(702.1 per 100,000) for 2011.

Both the UK and the US's rate of burglary has went down since then this latest recorded year of 2016. But, it's still significantly higher in the UK.

US - 468.9 per 100,000 ppl

UK - 704.9 per 100,000 ppl(from 411,536 offences)

FBI UCR 2016
Overview of burglary and other household theft - Office for National Statistics

So, that leaves us with a higher rape and burglary rate for the UK than in the US as of 2016 when you go to the most up to date primary sources, unlike your second hand out of date non-credible source would have us believe.

For someone who uses a source for a point where the whole premise is the need for analogous apples to apples comparisons you're sure doing a bad job at it citing that. You might as well throw the whole thing out as it's shown to be out of date and unreliable.

But, then all you'd be left to argue with is similies and ad hominem shyt post, I guess.
 
Last edited:

Pimpdaddy

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
5,134
Reputation
1,560
Daps
18,880
Reppin
#GMB
81ali9z.jpg

:francis:
 

Supper

All Star
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
2,920
Reputation
2,855
Daps
12,344
And rifles STILL only account for %3.4 of the firearm murders and %2.5 of the total homicides(knives, blunt objects and hands/feet account for more homicides). Assault rifles are but one subset of the rifle group.

But, I guess no one wants to peel themselves from their edgy political twitter talking points and juvenile snarky comments to address what exactly banning assault rifles will do to lower the high homicide rate in this country.
Expanded Homicide Data Table 4

Why isn't anyone addressing the much more relevant issues to the high homicide rate such as that of income, education, resources, family structure, and development environment which is what REALLY correlates far more closely to the homicide rate in this nation than level of gun liberties.

But as momentum builds for a new assault weapons ban, data shows just how small of an effect such legislation would have on the overall levels of gun violence in the U.S.

At least 84 people have been killed and 119 have been injured so far this year in 86 shooting incidents involving assault-style rifles, according to data compiled by the Gun Violence Archive, a not-for-profit corporation that tracks gun violence. Those numbers include the casualties at Pulse nightclub over the weekend.

There have been at least 267 incidents involving assault-style rifles in 2016, including reported weapons thefts, crimes in which the guns were brandished, arrests for illegal possession and other legal interventions in which they weren’t fired.

Those deaths account for about 2 percent of the 6,153 gun deaths and less than 1 percent of the 12,560 gun injuries the Gun Violence Archive has counted so far this year. This tally consists largely of homicides and assaults, but also includes suicides that were part of a murder-suicide. It also counts accidental deaths, the majority of which involve handguns, not rifles.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/assault-weapons-deaths_us_5763109de4b015db1bc8c123
 
Last edited:

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,353
Reputation
515
Daps
54,219
Reppin
Las Vegas
So your logic is to disarm law abiding citizens to stop outlaws who don't follow the laws? How is that going to make us safe?. A man who gives up freedom for security deserves neither.
always the strawman who leaps from banning certain types of weapons and high capacity magazines/weapons that are over certain rates of fire etc and equates that to wanting to take away someones handgun or hunting rifle. there is zero reason, aside from wanting to increase ease of slaughter, that any civilian needs an ar-15, high capacity mags etc. if you think folks do for "safety", you can simply go fukk yourself
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
78,930
Reputation
23,796
Daps
358,589
So what do you call these two vehicles at the top of the page for sale in the US? A car and a suv?

Armor Page 1
Candidly, you’re wasting your time. I can name 50 other weapons banned for civilian use. But if you see a fully operational M1 Abrams parked outside the movies this weekend, take a photo and let me know.

Also those vehicles you posted are decommissioned.
 

Supper

All Star
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
2,920
Reputation
2,855
Daps
12,344
If you think folks do for "safety", you can simply go fukk yourself

Therein lies the assumption that everybody who owns a gun for self-defense ONLY does it for protection from your average every day common criminal. When that's simply not the case.

Many people of those people are preppers who anticipate the possibility of societal decay and/or systematic corruption at some level leading to mass violence, which IS a very valid concern especially for us as black people, and has already happened in doses to us already in recent memory.

Gonna be hard to defend yourself from these guys without an assault rifle.
Post-Katrina, White Vigilantes Shot African-Americans With Impunity — ProPublica

So, your only option I guess is to call the cops for protection(If you're still living)- And then have these fine gentlemen turn up.
Danziger Bridge shootings - Wikipedia

So, I can't understand why any black person would willing advocate toeing the line of government regulation of their means to defend themselves should something like that happen again, but on a larger scale.

And you can say that the chance of that happening is slim(though starting to seem more likely in this political climate), but so is your chance of being killed by an assault rifle, as they only account for %2 of the gun deaths......Some 'slaughter', huh.

Now, with that said common sense gun control measures like making more robust gun safety courses, more thorough background checks, and stricter negligence penalties mandatory should also go along with that, as well.
 
Last edited:

Bunchy Carter

I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
19,888
Reputation
3,647
Daps
84,302
Reppin
Triple O.G. Bunchy Carter
Someone has to do a study on this pathological love that these cacs have for carrying "personal assault rifles" :jbhmm:


All you need is a gun for self-defense but nah, for them just a pistol is not enough. I mean, it seems they project all their insecurity into these big guns like: Yeah, i got me a fine mass shooting piece too, i'm a man now :mjlol:


Mfer out there flashing grenades on social media, sending direct threats with receipts and nobody check him? :gucci:




But let this be a breh and soon they would send a swat raid at his door in the morning :mjpls:

It's been done playa, thanks to Neely Fuller and Dr. Frances Cress Welsing (RIP):









 

Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
12,560
Reputation
4,254
Daps
73,966
Reppin
NULL
Candidly, you’re wasting your time. I can name 50 other weapons banned for civilian use. But if you see a fully operational M1 Abrams parked outside the movies this weekend, take a photo and let me know.

Also those vehicles you posted are decommissioned.
I'm just correcting your original clam that tanks are not legal to own by posting proof that vehicles defined as tanks are not illegal to own. No need for you to move the goal post by saying these kinda tanks are legal because....
 
Top