Who told you tanks are illegal to own?Lines are drawn all the time.
It's why pistols are legal to own and tanks are not.
It's harder to get Sudafed than an AR-15. If you don't think there's a problem there, you are just being willfully obtuse.
Here's something far more detailed:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/assault-weapons-deaths_us_5763109de4b015db1bc8c123But as momentum builds for a new assault weapons ban, data shows just how small of an effect such legislation would have on the overall levels of gun violence in the U.S.
At least 84 people have been killed and 119 have been injured so far this year in 86 shooting incidents involving assault-style rifles, according to data compiled by the Gun Violence Archive, a not-for-profit corporation that tracks gun violence. Those numbers include the casualties at Pulse nightclub over the weekend.
There have been at least 267 incidents involving assault-style rifles in 2016, including reported weapons thefts, crimes in which the guns were brandished, arrests for illegal possession and other legal interventions in which they weren’t fired.
Those deaths account for about 2 percent of the 6,153 gun deaths and less than 1 percent of the 12,560 gun injuries the Gun Violence Archive has counted so far this year. This tally consists largely of homicides and assaults, but also includes suicides that were part of a murder-suicide. It also counts accidental deaths, the majority of which involve handguns, not rifles.
always the strawman who leaps from banning certain types of weapons and high capacity magazines/weapons that are over certain rates of fire etc and equates that to wanting to take away someones handgun or hunting rifle. there is zero reason, aside from wanting to increase ease of slaughter, that any civilian needs an ar-15, high capacity mags etc. if you think folks do for "safety", you can simply go fukk yourselfSo your logic is to disarm law abiding citizens to stop outlaws who don't follow the laws? How is that going to make us safe?. A man who gives up freedom for security deserves neither.
They are.Who told you tanks are illegal to own?
So what do you call these three vehicles at the top of the page for sale in the US? A car, a suv, and a truck?They are.
And don’t come with talk about decommissioned. Because you know that’s not what I meant.
Candidly, you’re wasting your time. I can name 50 other weapons banned for civilian use. But if you see a fully operational M1 Abrams parked outside the movies this weekend, take a photo and let me know.So what do you call these two vehicles at the top of the page for sale in the US? A car and a suv?
Armor Page 1
If you think folks do for "safety", you can simply go fukk yourself
Someone has to do a study on this pathological love that these cacs have for carrying "personal assault rifles"
All you need is a gun for self-defense but nah, for them just a pistol is not enough. I mean, it seems they project all their insecurity into these big guns like: Yeah, i got me a fine mass shooting piece too, i'm a man now
Mfer out there flashing grenades on social media, sending direct threats with receipts and nobody check him?
But let this be a breh and soon they would send a swat raid at his door in the morning
I'm just correcting your original clam that tanks are not legal to own by posting proof that vehicles defined as tanks are not illegal to own. No need for you to move the goal post by saying these kinda tanks are legal because....Candidly, you’re wasting your time. I can name 50 other weapons banned for civilian use. But if you see a fully operational M1 Abrams parked outside the movies this weekend, take a photo and let me know.
Also those vehicles you posted are decommissioned.