Parasite (2019 Palme d'Or winner and The Film Room top movie of the year) - directed by Bong Joon-ho

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,615
Daps
70,582
Reppin
Rotterdam
The rich family were dumb a$$holes. The broke family were legit scumbags.
The only reason the poor family could take such advantage of the rich family was because of their many prejudices regarding 'lesser citizens'. I really wouldn't put one family over the other.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,859
Reppin
Behind You
The only reason the poor family could take such advantage of the rich family was because of their many prejudices regarding 'lesser citizens'. I really wouldn't put one family over the other.

The rich family was elitist, out of touch and benignly prejudiced while the broke family were predators.

The rich family went about their lives oblivious to the harm they might be doing to others while the other family knew they were being awful but felt like just because they were poor they had the right to take advantage of other people.

Neither family was a prize but there are levels to the awful between the two.
 

NobodyReally

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,268
Reputation
3,049
Daps
27,463
Reppin
Cornfields, cows, & an one stoplight town
The rich family was elitist, out of touch and benignly prejudiced while the broke family were predators.

The rich family went about their lives oblivious to the harm they might be doing to others while the other family knew they were being awful but felt like just because they were poor they had the right to take advantage of other people.

Neither family was a prize but there are levels to the awful between the two.

Disagree. The word parasite could refer to either family. That's what makes this movie so cool.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,859
Reppin
Behind You
Disagree. The word parasite could refer to either family. That's what makes this movie so cool.
What exactly do you disagree with?
I freely admit that both families were terrible and agree that you could made the argument that both families could be seen as parasites.
But they weren't on the same level of terrible.
 

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,605
Reputation
515
Daps
27,376
The rich family was elitist, out of touch and benignly prejudiced while the broke family were predators.

The rich family went about their lives oblivious to the harm they might be doing to others while the other family knew they were being awful but felt like just because they were poor they had the right to take advantage of other people.

Neither family was a prize but there are levels to the awful between the two.
They were predators because they had no choice growing up in poverty. There is a scene where the poor family is like "these rich people are nice" and the mom is like "they are nice because they are rich".
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,859
Reppin
Behind You
They were predators because they had no choice growing up in poverty. There is a scene where the poor family is like "these rich people are nice" and the mom is like "they are nice because they are rich".
They had a choice to not run a con on that family. Being poor doesn't absolve you from being trash ass criminals and doing shytty things to strangers.
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,315
Reputation
10,501
Daps
190,888
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
The father represents the arrogant callous out of touch with reality elite upper class. His disdain for anything close to poverty or his bubble being affected is displayed throughout the movie. For example the limo rides and the "poor man smell" quote we all keep dapping

The rich father made the :scusthov: face when he smelled the dead man's body and had to reach for the car keys under it while "Jessica" was bleeding to death in her father's arms which he gave zero fukks about. :manny:

You weren't paying attention.

The rich family were not callous enough for anyone to hate them. Kids were cool, mom was ditzy but cool, dad complained about a person who lived in the slums being smelly...whoopie. The poor family killed, stole, conned and framed others. They were much worse people.

As for what happened at the party, what would you have done if you were in the rich dad's position? You have minutes to get your kid to the hospital or he'll die, are you going to worry about a girl that you just met a few weeks ago? If anything the poor dad deserves more criticism for freezing up when his wife was fighting off ole dude.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
7,825
Reputation
915
Daps
24,258
Reppin
Philadelphia
The rich family were not callous enough for anyone to hate them. Kids were cool, mom was ditzy but cool, dad complained about a person who lived in the slums being smelly...whoopie. The poor family killed, stole, conned and framed others. They were much worse people.
You are trolling horribly or you completely missed the theme of the movie. You should watch it again and focus on the rich family and how they treat people. Plus read interviews from the director himself :manny:
 

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,615
Daps
70,582
Reppin
Rotterdam
The rich family was elitist, out of touch and benignly prejudiced while the broke family were predators.

The rich family went about their lives oblivious to the harm they might be doing to others while the other family knew they were being awful but felt like just because they were poor they had the right to take advantage of other people.

Neither family was a prize but there are levels to the awful between the two.

They had a choice to not run a con on that family. Being poor doesn't absolve you from being trash ass criminals and doing shytty things to strangers.
The con wasn't harmful to the rich family. It only hurt the employees they had to remove from their spot to get into the family, and when the housekeeper returned later they at least had a basic understanding of having wronged her.

The rich family never gave a shyt about their loyal employees to the point they let their prejudices about lower class people instantly outweigh the long relationship they had built up with them. The reason they were so easily manipulated was because they were scumbags just the same. They just had the luxury (literally) to take a more passive stance in achieving the same goal, which was to create a life of comfort.

The entire point of the movie is that the two families were essentially chasing the same goal, but one had reached and arrogantly sat in their ivory tower looking down on the people below struggling to climb the tower, and the other family had to pull down others to climb higher and even get a glimpse of the top.

But I understand you have accepted the enormous and unbalanced class/wealth differences of capitalism as "normal" so of course you didn't see what the rich family was "doing wrong".

:sas2:
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,859
Reppin
Behind You
The con wasn't harmful to the rich family. It only hurt the employees they had to remove from their spot to get into the family, and when the housekeeper returned later they at least had a basic understanding of having wronged her.

The rich family never gave a shyt about their loyal employees to the point they let their prejudices about lower class people instantly outweigh the long relationship they had built up with them. The reason they were so easily manipulated was because they were scumbags just the same. They just had the luxury (literally) to take a more passive stance in achieving the same goal, which was to create a life of comfort.

The entire point of the movie is that the two families were essentially chasing the same goal, but one had reached and arrogantly sat in their ivory tower looking down on the people below struggling to climb the tower, and the other family had to pull down others to climb higher and even get a glimpse of the top.

But I understand you have accepted the enormous and unbalanced class/wealth differences of capitalism as "normal" so of course you didn't see what the rich family was "doing wrong".

:sas2:
Are you just in a mood to fight over nothing? Because I have repeatedly posted that both families were trash. Coming at me with this ridiculous Bernie Bro "eat the rich" cosplay Socialist nonsense.

And I completely disagree that the con wasn't harmful to the rich family. The little boy had legit emotional issues that his parents thought were being dealt with by the fake "art therapy" the sister was faking and the poor family's son was going to marry that naive idiot rich daughter just for the money. He had no real feelings for her.
 

TheGodling

Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
20,078
Reputation
5,615
Daps
70,582
Reppin
Rotterdam
Are you just in a mood to fight over nothing? Because I have repeatedly posted that both families were trash. Coming at me with this ridiculous Bernie Bro "eat the rich" cosplay Socialist nonsense.

And I completely disagree that the con wasn't harmful to the rich family. The little boy had legit emotional issues that his parents thought were being dealt with by the fake "art therapy" the sister was faking and the poor family's son was going to marry that naive idiot rich daughter just for the money. He had no real feelings for her.
I'm always in the mood to fight over nothing. Welcome to my daily interactions with @MartyMcFly, breh. :russ:
 
Top