Paralyzed Rats Walk Again After Stem Cell Transplant

Chris Mauro

Banned
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
1,387
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,174
religion killing people in Boston and all over the world



Science saving lives :wow:
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,638
Daps
67,700

Where did I deny that evangelical Christians are against stem cell research?

I still don't know where you got that from.:rudy:

I never said you did, all I said was George Bush banned this shyt for 8 years because of his religious beliefs and you started talking shyt and brought up your stupid "there is no profit in the cure" when that isn't even true and that's why Obama repealed the ban
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
I never said you did, all I said was George Bush banned this shyt for 8 years because of his religious beliefs and you started talking shyt and brought up your stupid "there is no profit in the cure" when that isn't even true and that's why Obama repealed the ban
Me saying that there is no profit in the cure doesn't translate to me saying that evangelical Christians don't hate stem cell research. :snoop:

Just admit that you randomly brought that up cuz it isn't relevant to anything I said.

I said that he used that to his advantage cuz stem cell was a cure and would take the money gotten from just providing treatments.

If stem cell is still profitable even though it cures the issue and stops profits from lifetime treatment then I would stand corrected there but mentioning that Christians hate stem cell research isn't correcting me cuz I never said otherwise.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,638
Daps
67,700

Me saying that there is no profit in the cure doesn't translate to me saying that evangelical Christians don't hate stem cell research. :snoop:

Just admit that you randomly brought that up cuz it isn't relevant to anything I said.

I said that he used that to his advantage cuz stem cell was a cure and would take the money gotten from just providing treatments.
:snoop:

I never said you said that dude. GEORGE BUSH is an evangelical christian which is why HE BANNED STEM CELL RESEARCH. That's the only reason I brought that up.

You're saying there is a CONSPIRACY to ban stem cell research because that would result in "cures" that would threaten profits of the pharm industry. Did this conspiracy just stop under Obama?

You know how much money people would pay for cures to their diseases :mindblown:

they're literally growing body parts and organs from stem cells, these companies can make so much money off this, why the hell do you think so much research and development is being put into these things?

The truth is simple. George Bush is very religious and he feels stem cell research violates his beliefs, coincidentally, his voting base also agrees with this sentiment because they're religious republicans, you think he could've allowed it without pissing off the majority of his supporters? :beli:

Your theory is dumb. :ld:


Occam's razor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,280
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Sensitive Blake Griffin said:
In 2001, President George W. Bush restricted federal funding for research on stem cells obtained from human embryos because the technology required the destruction of human life. “At its core, this issue forces us to confront fundamental questions about the beginnings of life and the ends of science,” Bush said.

“My position on these issues is shaped by deeply held beliefs,” he said. “I also believe human life is a sacred gift from our creator.”

Nope. This guy is just another c*nty religious person who puts their own bullshyt ass beliefs over the health and well being of other human beings.

:aicmon:

George W. Bush said:
Embryonic stem cell research offers both great promise and great peril. So I have decided we must proceed with great care. … I have concluded that we should allow federal funds to be used for research on these [existing] stem cell lines, where the life-and-death decision has already been made. Leading scientists tell me research on these sixty lines has great promise that could lead to break through therapies and cures. This allows us to explore the promise and potential of stem cell research without crossing a fundamental moral line, by providing taxpayer funding that would sanction or encourage further destruction of human embryos that have at least the potential for life. … I have made this decision with great care, and I pray it is the right one.

~Decision Points, pg. 447

I don't like Bush but your hostility is misdirected. Stem Cell research wasn't restricted or hindered by Bush. Taxpayer-funded abortions to harvest stem cells was.​
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,638
Daps
67,700
:aicmon:



I don't like Bush but your hostility is misdirected. Stem Cell research wasn't restricted or hindered by Bush. Taxpayer-funded abortions to harvest stem cells was.​
Mr. Obama's action, before a packed East Room audience, reverses former President George W. Bush's policy on stem cell research by undoing a 2001 directive that banned federal funding for research into stem lines created after that date.

Mr. Bush limited the use of taxpayer money to only the 21 stem cell lines that had been produced before his decision.
This is why all the stem-cell research went OVERSEAS during this period in time.

Obama repealed the ban which is now why we're seeing such rapid advancement domestically.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
:snoop:

I never said you said that dude. GEORGE BUSH is an evangelical christian which is why HE BANNED STEM CELL RESEARCH. That's the only reason I brought that up.

You're saying there is a CONSPIRACY to ban stem cell research because that would result in "cures" that would threaten profits of the pharm industry.

You know how much money people would pay for cures to their diseases :mindblown:

they're literally growing body parts and organs from stem cells, these companies can make so much money off this, why the hell do you think so much research and development is being put into these things?

The truth is simple. George Bush is very religious and he feels stem cell research violates his beliefs, coincidentally, his voting base also agrees with this sentiment because they're religious republicans, you think he could've allowed it without pissing off the majority of his supporters? :beli:

Your theory is dumb. :ld:


Occam's razor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yea one set pay for cures. The issue would go away but would the price for the cure be more than the price for a lifelong treatment?

All I'm doing is bringing up a theory. I am not saying that one should be chosen over another so cut the crap.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,638
Daps
67,700

Yea one set pay for cures. The issue would go away but would the price for the cure be more than the price for a lifelong treatment?

All I'm doing is naming a theory. I am not saying that one should be chosen over another so cut the crap.
You cure one thing and now there are a billion other things left to cure dude. You can't stop advancement, you think they're just going to stop learning and discovering stuff because they don't want to cure anything? What about all the things we've already cured? why did they do that then? that would require a massive conspiracy amongst researchers who would probably take a lot of offense towards your assertions.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
You cure one thing and now there are a billion other things left to cure dude. You can't stop advancement, you think they're just going to stop learning and discovering stuff because they don't want to cure anything? What about all the things we've already cured? why did they do that then? that would require a massive conspiracy amongst researchers who would probably take a lot of offense towards your assertions.
I'd love the day where we could stop having to work to live and start enjoying life thanks to advancement but its not my fault that money and class and those who would like to keep class in place so they can stay in top are still alive and well. Its not my fault that they could be using their influence to hinder certain aspects of advancement if the result will hurt their monetary standing.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,280
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Sensitive Blake Griffin said:
This is why all the stem-cell research went OVERSEAS during this period in time.

Obama repealed the ban which is now why we're seeing such rapid advancement domestically.

Wrong. We're seeing the advancement due to Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, who pioneered stem cell harvesting by producing stem cells from skin cells in 2006....

yamanaka_shinya_nobel_1_320x468.jpg


THE NOBEL AT GLADSTONE

Lifting the ban is water-under-the-bridge as we have better and more plentiful sources for the same material at a much lower cost to the taxpayer without any ethical/moral concerns.​
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,638
Daps
67,700

I'd love the day where we could stop having to work to live and start enjoying life thanks to advancement but its not my fault that money and class and those who would like to keep class in place so they can stay in top are still alive and well. Its nit my fault that they could be using their influence to hinder certain aspects of advancement if it will hurt their monetary standing.
sigh..it won't hurt their monetary standing..it will help it. But go ahead, keep on thinking that. This conversation has been mind numbingly stupid.

And now funkdoc is posting.

seinfeld.gif
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
sigh..it won't hurt their monetary standing..it will help it. But go ahead, keep on thinking that. This conversation has been mind numbingly stupid.

And now funkdoc is posting.

seinfeld.gif
So lets say that we have a car engine that ran on water fully and different models could be made for different vehicles.

Wouldn't that hurt gas companies monetary standing?

If we had a cure for aids.

Wouldn't that hurt the companies that makes the treatments monetary standing?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
3,416
Reputation
509
Daps
7,622
Reppin
NULL
Looks like there's hope for people like ****:

Viable female and male mice from two fathers produced using stem cell technology

Derek can produce babies with his tranny lover now.

Wrong. We're seeing the advancement due to Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, who pioneered stem cell harvesting by producing stem cells from skin cells in 2006....

yamanaka_shinya_nobel_1_320x468.jpg


THE NOBEL AT GLADSTONE

Lifting the ban is water-under-the-bridge as we have better and more plentiful sources for the same material at a much lower cost to the taxpayer without any ethical/moral concerns.​

Yoooo is dat dat nikka who came up with the IPS shyt? That nikka a goon for reel tho. He mad gully yo

Dem scientists aint playing. Dey just playing God. Got dem computer 'puting, ya dig?

7FF1.jpeg
 
Top