$ over glory. Back then the equation was a lot closer to even. Toughest fights usually meant biggest $ fights. Floyd doesn't give a shyt what a boxing historian thinks, and he won't get more $ testing himself against the toughest fighter near his weight(GGG), so why should he?
If you transported this era into that type of era, Floyd could have a lot of great names on his resume like prime Sergio Martinez, Paul Williams, GGG, a prime Pac, prime Cotto, pre-wrap Margarito, Vernon Forrest, a closer to prime Shane & ODH, among others. If he really wanted to get his Henry Armstrong on, he could've gone up and fought Andre Ward. And even if he lost to some of these guys, that wouldn't hurt his resume. An over the hill Duran gets A LOT of credit for pushing a prime Hagler to the brink.
I think Floyd would've been tested more, which would've brought out more greatness, and he'd have a top 10 resume to go with his top 5 skills. He would definitely be a top 5-10 ATG IMO if he did that. But I'm not knocking him for it because it would've hurt his $, could've left him like Ali & Roach, and he didn't necessarily duck most of these guys.