This is why he settled the civil case. The discussions and deliberations during the civil case were used against him in the later criminal case. That was a violation of his double jeopardy rights.The original Civil lawsuit was not won by the accuser when Cosby gave that deposition that you are misquoting from. He settled which is what all celebs are advised to do from their team for PR reasons. He did not LOSE it as you suggested. But you already knew that, I'm sure.
And he never admitted to doing what he was charged with. He wasn't even charged with "drugging someone". But im sure you knew that too as you are one of the biggest liars on this site.
Can't wait till they ban you again. Hopefully next time they won't let you come back until after the election
so why do u feel the need to be in a thread that is fueling his downfall?He's grown. He can stand on his own or with his family by his side. I just prefer facts over astrological signs and conspiracies.
This is why he settled the civil case. The discussions and deliberations during the civil case were used against him in the later criminal case. That was a violation of his double jeopardy rights.
Cosby's past words on drugs and sex led to conviction: juror
April 30, 201811:04 AM EDTUpdated 6 years ago
Actor and comedian Bill Cosby exits Montgomery County Courthouse after a jury convicted him in a sexual assault retrial in Norristown
Actor and comedian Bill Cosby exits Montgomery County Courthouse after a jury convicted him in a sexual assault retrial in Norristown, Pennsylvania, U.S., April 26, 2018. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid Purchase Licensing Rights
(Reuters) - Bill Cosby's 2005 admission that he drugged women to have sex with them was the most compelling piece of evidence leading a Pennsylvania jury to finding him guilty of sexual assault, one of the jurors told ABC's "Good Morning America" on Monday.
That admission, which the actor made when he was facing a civil lawsuit, had also been a key piece of evidence for prosecutors in Cosby's first trial on the charges, which ended last year with that jury unable to reach a verdict.
"It was his deposition," Harrison Snyder, 22, told ABC. "Mr. Cosby admitted to giving these Quaaludes to women, young women, in order to have sex with them."
The 80-year-old entertainer, best known as the iconic father from the 1980'S TV hit "The Cosby Show," faces up to 30 years in prison when he is sentenced in the next three months for drugging and raping Andrea Constand, 45, in 2004 at his home in a Philadelphia suburb.
The seven-man, five-woman jury that included Snyder reached a unanimous decision on Thursday after 12 hours of deliberations, about 10 months after the previous jury deadlocked in his first trial on the same charges, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial.
In the deposition from the 2005 civil lawsuit filed by Constand, Cosby described giving drugs, including the sedative Quaaludes, and alcohol to women before sex, hosting Constand at his home and a slew of other acts.
Prosecutors presented new witnesses at Cosby's most recent trial that the judge had blocked them from calling in 2017, including five other women who accused him of drugging and assaulting them.
Snyder told ABC that he had been unfamiliar with Cosby and the #MeToo movement against sexual assault and harassment before the trial because he does not watch the news and that he was not initially sure that Cosby was guilty. He was convinced after hearing the evidence.
"If you were there, you would say the same thing. You would say that he's guilty," Snyder said. "I have no doubt at all."
Cosby is planning to appeal the verdict, which could potentially delay his imprisonment for months or even years.
Reporting by Gina Cherelus in New York; editing by Scott Malone and Jonathan Oatis
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Purchase Licensing Rights
"It was his deposition," Harrison Snyder, 22, told ABC. "Mr. Cosby admitted to giving these Quaaludes to women, young women, in order to have sex with them."
He didn’t win. He settled. Thats not a win in civil cases. You know this, of course.You're so stupid that you're not understanding.
The article is incorrect where the journalist interjected their own opinion. Read the statement from the prosecutor. The prosecutor didn't say that Cosby drugged anyone. The prosecutors said he GAVE them drugs. Those are two very different things. If he drugged those women, they could have filed a charge against him for that. But they did not.
Giving someone drugs is NOT drugging them. And again Cosby won both cases.
They gave him a non-prosecutorial deal. Thats why the case was overturned, not because he’s innocent of the charges.The first case they couldn't get him so they tried him a second time and even then they had to violate his civil rights to do it. He would have won that one had they not violated his rights. Why? Cause the man is innocent.
The attorney says
@Neo The Resurrected ONE
The depositions in the civil case helped to bury Cosby…but it was overturned because it wasn’t supposed to be used in the criminal case.
Cosby admitted it in the civil case. You’re wrong. He’s functionally guilty.
Bill Cosby, in Deposition, Said Drugs and Fame Helped Him Seduce Women (Published 2015)
Mr. Cosby testified over four days of intense questioning 10 years ago at a Philadelphia hotel, where he defended himself in a deposition for a lawsuit filed by a young woman who accused him of drugging and molesting her.www.nytimes.com
Bill Cosby, in Deposition, Said Drugs and Fame Helped Him Seduce Women
July 18, 2015
Bill Cosby in 2014.Evan Vucci/Associated Press
Read updates of Day 11 of the Bill Cosby trial.
He was not above seducing a young model by showing interest in her father’s cancer. He promised other women his mentorship and career advice before pushing them for sex acts. And he tried to use financial sleight of hand to keep his wife from finding out about his serial philandering.
Bill Cosby admitted to all of this and more over four days of intense questioning 10 years ago at a Philadelphia hotel, where he defended himself in a deposition for a lawsuit filed by a young woman who accused him of drugging and molesting her.
Even as Mr. Cosby denied he was a sexual predator who assaulted many women, he presented himself in the deposition as an unapologetic, cavalier playboy, someone who used a combination of fame, apparent concern and powerful sedatives in a calculated pursuit of young women — a profile at odds with the popular image he so long enjoyed, that of father figure and public moralist.
In the deposition, which Mr. Cosby has for years managed to keep private but was obtained by The New York Times, the entertainer comes across as alternately annoyed, mocking, occasionally charming and sometimes boastful, often blithely describing sexual encounters in graphic detail.
...
The parties have been prohibited from releasing the memorandum because of a confidentiality clause that was part of the settlement agreement, but the deposition itself was never sealed. This month, Ms. Constand’s lawyer asked the court to lift the confidentiality clause so her client would be free to release the nearly 1,000-page deposition transcript. The Times later learned that the transcript was already publicly available through a court reporting service.
”
...
Yet the association endured for a few years, until one night at his Pennsylvania home, when Ms. Constand said Mr. Cosby drugged and molested her.
Mr. Cosby said he gave her one and a half tablets of Benadryl to relieve stress, they kissed and had sexual contact. Her lawyer said she believed it was a much more powerful drug.
...
During the call, Mr. Cosby told the deposing lawyers, he wanted Ms. Constand to tell her mother “about the orgasm” so that she would realize it was consensual.
Andrea Constand, pictured in 1987, in Toronto.Ron Bull/The Toronto Star, via The Canadian Press, via Associated Press
“Tell your mother about the orgasm. Tell your mother how we talked,” he said he remembered thinking.
...
He admitted to giving young women quaaludes at that time “the same as a person would say have a drink,” he said, but not without their knowledge.
Though he portrayed the drug-taking and sex as consensual, Mr. Cosby — when asked whether Ms. Serignese was in a position to consent to sexual intercourse after he gave her quaaludes in 1976 — said: “I don’t know.”
...
He admitted to giving young women quaaludes at that time “the same as a person would say have a drink,” he said, but not without their knowledge.
he demurred when asked if they knew if they were being drugged.You're so ignorant that you're not looking at what you're quoting. In that article right there it says he didn't give the drugs without their knowledge. Meaning they KNEW and consensually took whatever he offered them. Which was my point.
In the article, ole girl didn't say he forced it down her throat. He gave her a pill and she willingly took it. Which goes back to what I said earlier.
I could give your fool ass a pill right now. If you take it, does that mean I drugged you?
My God you are stupid.
He didn’t win. He settled. Thats not a win in civil cases. You know this, of course.
They gave him a non-prosecutorial deal. Thats why the case was overturned, not because he’s innocent of the charges.
He was found guilty in the criminal trial because of stuff in the civil trial that was not supposed to be used against him. Read the appeal in the Pennsylvania Supreme CourtIf he was guilty, no prosecutor would have turned down the opportunity to bring him down. We see prosecutors all the time who WISH they could have a career defining case that will be in the news.
No, they settle because of the demand for privacy. True innocence takes it to trial. Of course it was much more messy for him to go through with the proceedings but 2005 isn’t 2015.The prosecutor didn't prosecute cause Cosby was being sleazy and cheating on his wife... but he didn't commit any crimes.
Cosby settled the civil lawsuit because again, that's what all celebrities are advised to do because going through a protracted trial does their career no favors. You know as well as I do that most celebrities settle not because of guilt but so that they can move on. They go ahead and give the person suing them what they want, which is money, to get them out of their hair.
yeah. I honestly don’t understand it.No defense but that sex trafficking charge appears to very vague. It appears that having h0es for a freak off or paying h0es to get loose applies.
he demurred when asked if they knew if they were being drugged.
Bill Cosby, in Deposition, Said Drugs and Fame Helped Him Seduce Women (Published 2015)
Mr. Cosby testified over four days of intense questioning 10 years ago at a Philadelphia hotel, where he defended himself in a deposition for a lawsuit filed by a young woman who accused him of drugging and molesting her.www.nytimes.com
Though he portrayed the drug-taking and sex as consensual, Mr. Cosby — when asked whether Ms. Serignese was in a position to consent to sexual intercourse after he gave her quaaludes in 1976 — said: “I don’t know.”
Why yall nikkas doing this? You can clearly see in the types of relationships Usher has it’s always with some old flabby broad.. he married them and hand kids with them.. except Chili
It’s clear his experience staying with puff was a result of him getting his virginity taken by older women that was at puffy camp.. sexually molested by older women