I'm not particularly impressed with what I'm reading on there currently
OpenAI introduces Sora
- Thread starter Ill-Mind
- Start date
↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
OpenAI has a jukebox model as well. Expect to see some insane shyt in the next 3-6 months
GreenGhxst
Veteran
God damn
When they release VR sex shyt, I'm installing this bytch onto my system immediately
shyt been out breh
he should put $800 million into A.I. instead. pikalabs product debut should have been been the time to call it off. just goes to show a lot of people don't understand exponential growth or how fast things are really about to change.
And just like that, proof that those that control mainstream avenues of communications can now use these tools to produce at zero cost to themselves and zero benefit to every other industry that supported them before.
Space Cowboy
Allahu Akbar
I have so many film ideas and I'm considering using AI as a sketchbook of sorts to put them all to wax. 
I doubt this software is the reason he is postponing the expansion. These services won't be free.
The studios can already afford high end software most independent professionals cannot.
Now they'll have the tools to produce at less 5% the original cost and time due to a 95% or so elimination in labor and outsourcing
I see plenty of films with shytty vfx. Only thing I see this doing is supressing wages.The studios can already afford high end software most independent professionals cannot.
Now they'll have the tools to produce at less 5% the original cost and time due to a 95% or so elimination in labor and outsourcing
That's all its about. And being able to churn out bullshyt constantly. We're going to reach an inflection point on "content" pretty soon with all this stuff. And the sad part is there won't be any artistry to it.
The more people they can cut out of the process the more they can keep at the top. Virtually all creative works are devalued with this shyt, so if you're already at the top. You'll just lease out the latest AI tool and call it a day. For the rest of us, its a wrap. Even people pushing that "LEARN TO PROMPT!" shyt are just grifters. Once someone gets a positive prompt the shyt is fed into the model. You don't need to write it like that again, so once it starts self-learning itll just fold onto itself.
it'll be cheaper to produce content for independent creatives as well. no expensive sets etc.. it's going to hit a lot of government tax coffers too since if companies aren't filming then they aren't spending money at local businesses or paying for access to publicly own locations like subways etc.
Will they allow you to copyright AI generated content? Are we going to be inundated with crappy content?
So much garbage out there now. I can't even imagine with AI generating more BS.
Seems like the future is going to be curated content.
don't know how much they'll tweak it after the studios do some lobbying but this it is for now.
define crappy content cause i'm pretty sure you can find that now without AI
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/JSX7UODPNVM4PKCR3XEOWCDN6U.jpg)
US Copyright Office denies protection for another AI-created image
The U.S. Copyright Office has again rejected copyright protection for art created using artificial intelligence, denying a request by artist Jason M. Allen for a copyright covering an award-winning image he created with the generative AI system Midjourney.www.reuters.com
US Copyright Office denies protection for another AI-created image
By Blake Brittain
September 6, 20236:20 PM EDTUpdated 5 days ago
AI (Artificial Intelligence) letters are placed on computer motherboard in this illustration taken, June 23, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Acquire Licensing Rights
- Summary
- Midjourney-created "space opera" artwork not protectable, office says
- Office has previously rejected copyrights for AI-generated work
Sept 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Copyright Office has again rejected copyright protection for art created using artificial intelligence, denying a request by artist Jason M. Allen for a copyright covering an award-winning image he created with the generative AI system Midjourney.
The office said on Tuesday that Allen's science-fiction themed image "Theatre D'opera Spatial" was not entitled to copyright protection because it was not the product of human authorship.
The Copyright Office in February rescinded copyrights for images that artist Kris Kashtanova created using Midjourney for a graphic novel called "Zarya of the Dawn," dismissing the argument that the images showed Kashtanova's own creative expression. It has also rejected a copyright for an image that computer scientist Stephen Thaler said his AI system created autonomously.
Allen said on Wednesday that the office's decision on his work was expected, but he was "certain we will win in the end."
"If this stands, it is going to create more problems than it solves," Allen said. "This is going to create new and creative problems for the copyright office in ways we can't even speculate yet."
Representatives for Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the decision on Wednesday.
Allen applied last September to register a copyright in "Theatre D'opera Spatial," an image evoking a futuristic royal court that won the Colorado State Fair's art competition in 2022. A Copyright Office examiner requested more information about Midjourney's role in creating the image, which had received national attention as the first AI-generated work to win the contest.
Allen told the office that he "input numerous revisions and text prompts at least 624 times to arrive at the initial version of the image" using Midjourney and altered it with Adobe Photoshop.
The office asked Allen to disclaim the parts of the image that Midjourney generated in order to receive copyright protection. It rejected Allen's application after he declined.
The office's Copyright Review Board affirmed the decision on Tuesday, finding the image as a whole was not copyrightable because it contained more than a minimal amount of AI-created material.
The office also rejected Allen's argument that denying copyrights for AI-created material leaves a "void of ownership troubling to creators."
Read more:
Humans vs. machines: the fight to copyright AI art
AI-created images lose U.S. copyrights in test for new technology
AI-generated art cannot receive copyrights, US court says
Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington
Theatre D'opera Spatial
Similar threads
