People will instantly point to rings and it's such a terrible argument.
If this pass isn't dropped all the discussion about Montana being the GOAT is crippled:
The obvious answer will be: "BUT IT WASN'T DROPPED." Which is true but it's not like Montana had any control over whether or not it was, he got lucky. Ranking QBs off an extremely small sample size of games and team accomplishments like SB wins will always be retarded.
I want to hear the argument for Montana over Marino that breaks down their skills/ability and ignores the whole count the rings nonsense. If it's as obvious as people make it out to be, should be an easy question to answer.
If this pass isn't dropped all the discussion about Montana being the GOAT is crippled:
The obvious answer will be: "BUT IT WASN'T DROPPED." Which is true but it's not like Montana had any control over whether or not it was, he got lucky. Ranking QBs off an extremely small sample size of games and team accomplishments like SB wins will always be retarded.
I want to hear the argument for Montana over Marino that breaks down their skills/ability and ignores the whole count the rings nonsense. If it's as obvious as people make it out to be, should be an easy question to answer.
Last edited by a moderator: