[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm3ErTOp0JQ"]Dan Marino TDs 1984 - YouTube[/ame]
Marino lost to a 15-1 team In The Super Bowl. That wasn't a crime.Did Marino ever fukk up at the end of games? He managed games as good as Montana
All I remember is dude losing games while his D is on the field, he always did his job.
Edit:
Super Bowl XIX was his second year in the league u retards. First full season.
Montana didn't have to force the ball to bum ass WRs to win games
Montana didn't have to force the ball to bum ass WRs to win games
Nothing about Marinos play demonstrates that he'd fail if put in the same situations as Joe Montana.
Nothing....
Where'd I say "what if" anywhere?so we resorting to what ifs now ?
okay I can play that game too
nothing about Montanas play demonstrates that hed fail if put in the same situations as Dan Marino.
Nothing
so ? you are acting like 4000 yards are anything important.
bum ass stafford passed for 5000 yards. so what ? mike martz was popping them 4000 yard qbs out before the passing craze
once you realize that the QBs job is NOT TO THROW FOR 41948129128 yards or making gorgeous thread the needle throws but rather to actually manage the game and make right decisions you wouldnt be writing stupid shyt like this.
Where'd I say "what if" anywhere?
Nothing about Marinos make up as a qb leads me to believe that he'd fail being in Joes position on San Fran.
no, youre looking at it wrong.it's not the end all, be all, but it's a pretty safe barometer considering every other QB that is considered top 5 to ever do it has accomplished this...
you're looking at it the wrong way. not every QB that throws for 30+ TD's multiple times and 4,000 yards is elite. BUT EVERY OTHER DUDE WHO CAN BE CONSIDERED A TOP 5 QUARTERBACK HAS DONE SO. So I'd say it's a fair measuring stick, with Montana being the outlier:
.
would've=what if in this instance.
you are using a hypothetical statement to put player x in player y shoes