I didn't move anything... 1. People also didn't like Trump... people came out in droves just to vote against him 2. You are just ignorantly choosing to use "popular vote" and "popularity ratings" as interchangeable terms...which they are not
3. You are proving my point that you are still living in 1996...what the fukk does Bill winning the white house 30 years ago have to do wirh how people CURRENTLY view him.... It's clear that you're an old ass 50+ year old nikka that out of touch and still living in a time capsule lmao
Like I said using popularity rating and popular vote as interchangeable terms is ignorant analysis as it ignores the inherent party support any presidential candidate will get by being at the top of their parties ticket and it ignores the support a candidate receives from people who are simply against the opposition ... Slogans like "vote blue no matter who" perfect encapsulates that reality...no presidential candidate is going to get 0 votes
so what the fukk are you saying??
Even using your popularity vote measurement.. There's only 1 democratic presidential candidate that received less votes than her over the past 20 years and it was a fellow loser in John Kerry... Now I'll let you figure out why that is numpsay
Honestly tho.. fact that you're even attempting to continue arguing this dumb shyt when I already posted her jaw droppingly bad popularity numbers is hilarious.. It's classic Coli doubling down on dumb logic
Hillary Clinton's favorable rating has dipped to 36%, the lowest Gallup has measured for her. Bill Clinton's favorable rating is now his lowest since 2001.
news.gallup.com
Of course they aren't that's because in Hillary case the people already told her ass they didn't want her
And this is why losers lose....lmao...how did that "gravity" work for Hillary's campaign? Lol...I'll wait