OJ killed them people, right? If so, how?

[MIKE SPLEAN]

He didn’t
But he knows who did

 

[Renzo]

Innocent.. the blood on the gates were planted and found to have a blood preservative in it. At the actual crime scene there was little to no of Simpsons blood.. the amount was the size of a nano bible. There was no blood found in Simpsons home and this is after he supposedly murdered two people. The LAPD or rogue officers with the dept killed them. Furhman even bragged to fellow officers about "seeing Nicoles new t*ts".

 

[FeverPitch2]

Innocent.. the blood on the gates were planted and found to have a blood preservative in it. At the actual crime scene there was little to no of Simpsons blood.. the amount was the size of a nano bible. There was no blood found in Simpsons home and this is after he supposedly murdered two people. The LAPD or rogue officers with the dept killed them. Furhman even bragged to fellow officers about seeing Nicoles new t*ts.

The blood evidence discovered by LAPD had EDTA in it
EDTA is a chemical labs put into blood samples to keep it from coagulating
The prosecution and the LAPD pushed back really hard on this because if they admitted it then that would prove the LAPD planted the blood evidence
So both sides agreed to some awkward wording where the EDTA was acknowledged but the LAPD wouldn't admit to planting evidence
When OJ was brought in they took 8mL of his blood
In the evidence inventory only 6mL could be accounted for
LAPD detective Phillip Vanatter had taken the both OJ and the victims blood into his possession


Los Angeles Times - Page unavailable in your region

Vannatter Tells Why Brought Blood Sample to Simpson Home

As he had during the criminal trial, Vannatter explained that he did not book Simpson's blood sample into evidence immediately because he wanted to deliver it directly to the criminalist working on the case. He said he never pocketed it, never unsealed it, never even looked at it after depositing it in a special envelope designed to carry blood evidence.

Again and again, defense attorney Robert C. Baker tried to ask Vannatter whether he had violated "one of the fundamentals of good crime scene procedures" by bringing the vial to Simpson's home as criminalists were collecting evidence there. But the judge blocked such questions as irrelevant or argumentative. Baker did get Vannatter to acknowledge that the blood sample was briefly out of his sight when he left it on his desk in the police station to get a snack before going to Simpson's home.

Baker also questioned Vannatter's decision to pick up the murder victims' blood samples from the coroner's office and personally deliver them to the police crime lab. But the detective insisted that such intervention was not unusual.

 

[Ya Sinning Mane]

These oj gifs are fukkin GOAT

 

[Renzo]

The blood evidence discovered by LAPD had EDTA in it
EDTA is a chemical labs put into blood samples to keep it from coagulating
The prosecution and the LAPD pushed back really hard on this because if they admitted it then that would prove the LAPD planted the blood evidence
So both sides agreed to some awkward wording where the EDTA was acknowledged but the LAPD wouldn't admit to planting evidence
When OJ was brought in they took 8mL of his blood
In the evidence inventory only 6mL could be accounted for
LAPD detective Phillip Vanatter had taken the both OJ and the victims blood into his possession


Los Angeles Times - Page unavailable in your region

Vannatter Tells Why Brought Blood Sample to Simpson Home

As he had during the criminal trial, Vannatter explained that he did not book Simpson's blood sample into evidence immediately because he wanted to deliver it directly to the criminalist working on the case. He said he never pocketed it, never unsealed it, never even looked at it after depositing it in a special envelope designed to carry blood evidence.

Again and again, defense attorney Robert C. Baker tried to ask Vannatter whether he had violated "one of the fundamentals of good crime scene procedures" by bringing the vial to Simpson's home as criminalists were collecting evidence there. But the judge blocked such questions as irrelevant or argumentative. Baker did get Vannatter to acknowledge that the blood sample was briefly out of his sight when he left it on his desk in the police station to get a snack before going to Simpson's home.

Baker also questioned Vannatter's decision to pick up the murder victims' blood samples from the coroner's office and personally deliver them to the police crime lab. But the detective insisted that such intervention was not unusual.

Took his blood BACK to the crime scene for 3hrs at that. Furhman was unaccounted for that night and said he was at a police conference that had actually taken place a week before. There was no blood found at Simpson's home either.

 

[CHICAGO]

"Where the clothes?" They found the matching glove at his house.

Dude, stop.

YOU CANT BE THE GULLIBLE.

YOU DO KNOW STONE COLD WHITE SUPREMACIST MARK FURHMAN
IS ON TAPE SAYING HE PLANTS EVIDENCE ON BLACK MEN ALL THE TIME...
ESPECIALLY BLACK MEN WITH WHITE SPOUSES?





​

 

[SunZoo]

These oj gifs are fukkin GOAT

 

[Dr. Acula]

He most likely did it

But I still love how angry it makes cacs that he got away with it

This basically...

 

[Ayo]

OJ probably did it.

LAPD probably knew that.

They didn’t want another rich guy literally getting away with murder. ESPECIALLY a black rich guy who killed a white woman.

So they planted shyt to try and bolster their case and it cost them a guilty verdict.

shyt evened out in the end

 

[klientel]

OJ probably did it.

LAPD probably knew that.

They didn’t want another rich guy literally getting away with murder. ESPECIALLY a black rich guy who killed a white woman.

So they planted shyt to try and bolster their case and it cost them a guilty verdict.

shyt evened out in the end

This scenario makes more sense than any other...

 

[Mr swag]

OJ didn’t do it

There is no evidence

 

[Geek Nasty]

A friend of mine's Uber driver in LA used to be OJ's limo driver and he told him it was the son.

There was a rumor a while back OJs daughter said the same thing at school

 

[Geek Nasty]

as someone who was born after the verdict and didnt see the trial in real time ive always been kinda curious about what it felt like watching it go down
most high profile trial that i think has happened in my life was the zimmerman one

Basically the same thing, except it was on 24-7. This was before the CourtTV era, so major networks were all over it. There wasn't a bunch of cable news networks to pawn it off on.

Funny thing is I ignored most of the coverage and didn't start wtaching until all the post-trial documentaries started showing up. That coverage was about being honest about the news and not trying to stage "white lawyer thinks he's guilty/black lawyer thinks he's innocent" catfights. Coverage was biased during the trial to make OJ look more guilty because that kept the narrative going and kept racial tensions high.

 

[mag357]

I know I was mad AF because they interrupted Urkel to to show this water head nikka driving up and down the street on every channel.

Like you couldn't get away from that shyt, you would think it was as important of an event as some natural disaster or terrorist attack the way it took over the airwaves.

Urkel? nikka, u was worried bout Urkel?

My nikka they cut into the NBA finals with the knicks for that shyt.

 

[Baka's Weird Case]

Urkel? nikka, u was worried bout Urkel?

My nikka they cut into the NBA finals with the knicks for that shyt.

rockets knicks was a classic series too