@mkraju
At the House briefing on the US drone strike in Iraq that killed Iran's Qasem Soleimani, Democrats got into a back-and-forth with the Trump administration over the legal authorities for attacking Iran and the imminent nature of Soleimani’s threat to the US, per sources present
91
15:17 - 8 Jan 2020
@mkraju
· 43s
Replying to @mkraju
Rep. Adam Smith, chairman of the House Armed Services, pressed the officials about the legal authorities, and the administration officials defended using the 2002 AUMF for military action against Iran, per multiple sources
@mkraju
Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of House Intelligence, disputed the notion that it was an imminent threat, even noting that the Ayotallah Khamenei had not signed off on the planned attacks that Soleimani had been plotting, per sources present. (Schiff’s spokesman declined to comment.)
15:18 - 8 Jan 2020
[/QUOTE]
@mkraju
· 46s
Replying to @mkraju
Admin gave general timeframe of when Soleimani’s attacks against US interests in Iraq and in region had been planned, per multiple sources in both parties. GOP argued it made sense to take out a top general now with the attack planned underway - rather than when it was too late.
Manu Raju
@mkraju
Gina Haspel, at the briefing, detailed Soleimani's long history of violence against US interests.
Yet Democrats said the killing escalated the threat - and the administration failed to show that an imminent threat existed to justify the killing.
15:19 - 8 Jan 2020