Not supposed to be how the law works. If a jury finds him not guilty at least you actually tried.Good luck in finding a jury that finds trump guilty
Not supposed to be how the law works. If a jury finds him not guilty at least you actually tried.Good luck in finding a jury that finds trump guilty
nothing. These people won't admit what we're all seeing in real time. The AGs job is to protect the position at all costs.so what's different now....?
Then why check the thread? Seems like a waste of time if you have already concluded nothing is going to happen.he's the former president... ain't nothing happening to that dude....
Please hit the unfollow button and work on getting your white friends and family to elect better officialsnothing. These people won't admit what we're all seeing in real time. The AGs job is to protect the position at all costs.
I live in a deep red state who supports Trump 70-30 and has Marsha Blackburn as a senator. Better chance of a meteor hitting me than that happening. It's not a necessity to have more Dems if the ones already there won't do anything to actually protect democracy and uphold the actual rule of law. Nice Democratic playbooking though.Then why check the thread? Seems like a waste of time if you have already concluded nothing is going to happen.
Please hit the unfollow button and work on getting your white friends and family to elect better officials
i don't disagree with you here....Then why check the thread? Seems like a waste of time if you have already concluded nothing is going to happen.
This is nothing like muellerWe heard this song before with Mueller. Garlands is a puzzy who couldn't handle the situation. He's trying to help Trump run out the clock
This is nothing like mueller
So you're telling me a SC which is going to take more years to investigate a 76 y/o man is going to do anything with the information the AG already has and can already make a charge on is going to be different than the other SC that found evidence Trump committed crimes the current AG let expire?
The mental gymnastics are great
Congress was the only body who could legally remove a president from office. That's why Mueller punted to Congress after admitting Trump as guilty and should be prosecuted.so what's different now....?
It's just bs. They know he took the documents 18 months ago. Had plenty of time to indict and plenty of cases to choose from. Dragged their feet and when Garland had to make a decision on whether to charge, he punted the case which still has to come back to him for charges. It's the ultimate stall tactic. This man was right:So how long is this one gonna take? Don't they have the documents already? They know what he took right? They should know the crime already?
He could've been indicted on 1/21 for any charge they had evidence on and not a single one.Congress was the only body who could legally remove a president from office. That's why Mueller punted to Congress after admitting Trump as guilty and should be prosecuted.
He doesn't hold an office to be removed from currently (ex president or not) so congress isn't needed in order to punish him for crimes.
how is this p*ssy gonna make it through a primary and presidential campaign he's gonna implode the second he has to step out of this little mar a lago, fox news safe space he lives in