This was entertaining as fukk..just got out the theater...easily the best of the Thor movies
Where was sif though?
if you read the story or even watched the animated Planet Hulk movie you can clearly see they hijacked that story and made it this film. im just so mindblown at how good they made it work.For those wondering why hulk hasn't gotten his own film . .the answer is as simple as ownership rights . . universal owns the right to film adaptations of hulk . . somehow marvel can feature hulk in films but he can't have his own film . .so what they are doing with hulk at this time is telling a version of his planet hulk story throughout the 3 upcoming films? better for me to link the article(can't find that specific article talking about how the hulk will change through the upcoming three films but this one speaks on why he can't have his own film)
Why A Solo Hulk Movie Will Never Happen, According To Mark Ruffalo
"A standalone Hulk movie will never happen because Universal has the rights for the standalone Hulk movie and for some reason they don't know how to play well with Marvel. And they don't want to make money."
also
Even though the Hulk appears fairly regularly in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the situation with his movie rights is a bit complicated. As it goes, Universal owns the rights to any standalone Hulk movie, but he can appear in Avengers movies where his name isn't in the title. Hence using Thor: Ragnarok to tell a Planet Hulk adaptation. So, Marvel Studios can't make a Hulk standalone without working together with Universal.
so look forward to the hulks story playing out more in the next 2 films(don't know exactly which films I assume one of the avengers films though) oh and nvm it isn't marvel they hate it's disney and disney owns marvel now so
Here's Why Marvel Won't Make a Solo Hulk Movie
The incredible hulk was also a flop so I'm sure that plays into it as well.For those wondering why hulk hasn't gotten his own film . .the answer is as simple as ownership rights . . universal owns the right to film adaptations of hulk . . somehow marvel can feature hulk in films but he can't have his own film . .so what they are doing with hulk at this time is telling a version of his planet hulk story throughout the 3 upcoming films? better for me to link the article(can't find that specific article talking about how the hulk will change through the upcoming three films but this one speaks on why he can't have his own film)
Why A Solo Hulk Movie Will Never Happen, According To Mark Ruffalo
"A standalone Hulk movie will never happen because Universal has the rights for the standalone Hulk movie and for some reason they don't know how to play well with Marvel. And they don't want to make money."
also
Even though the Hulk appears fairly regularly in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the situation with his movie rights is a bit complicated. As it goes, Universal owns the rights to any standalone Hulk movie, but he can appear in Avengers movies where his name isn't in the title. Hence using Thor: Ragnarok to tell a Planet Hulk adaptation. So, Marvel Studios can't make a Hulk standalone without working together with Universal.
so look forward to the hulks story playing out more in the next 2 films(don't know exactly which films I assume one of the avengers films though) oh and nvm it isn't marvel they hate it's disney and disney owns marvel now so
Here's Why Marvel Won't Make a Solo Hulk Movie
I was wondering that as well towards the endhow many people live on Asgard?
oh and how didRay Stevenson and Zach Levi even come back for this movie? They couldn't fight Hela for like 45 seconds, and get a noble death? i thought that fukkin sucked to be honest. At least the Asian dude had a bit of a last stand.
will people admit this is better than Wonder Woman? ... probably not.
it is though. best comic movie this year for sure, and i liked everything that came before. i like this more than Logan too, but i know people are hypnotized by that movie.