Dallas' 4 Eva
Superstar
I've read the next book they don't need multiple timelines, everything happens concurrently.
Well, season 1 was based on the the first two books. And they jumped back and forth with the timeline too. But all the rest of the books in the series followed one single timeline. So i don't think they were going to do the time jumping in season 2 regardless of the reception.Wise decision. It was poorly handled and unnecessary. For show going through such a heavy lore and world building in its 1st season. The way they handle the timelines was just sloppy editing and random.
Also, glad the show runner backed off on not using The Wild Hunt after CD project got a new Witcher deal and improved their relationship.
I know that, but they still did it poorly.Well, season 1 was based on the the first two books. And they jumped back and forth with the timeline too. But all the rest of the books in the series followed one single timeline. So i don't think they were going to do the time jumping in season 2 regardless of the reception.
Understood, just saying this isn't surprising regardless. More necessity than wisdom.I know that, but they still did it poorly.
I agree, but there will be creative liberties taken with the Wild Hunt. They aren't going to easily translate 1:1 from video game characters to on-screen multi-season arch antagonist. They are gonna change a lot of things because what works in video games doesn't work in film.Understood, just saying this isn't surprising regardless. More necessity than wisdom.
Also regarding the wild hunt aspect. I'm hoping they don't use that actually. It was a great game, but the whole premise sort of (not entirely) contradicts the ending of the entire book series.
Understood, just saying this isn't surprising regardless. More necessity than wisdom.
Also regarding the wild hunt aspect. I'm hoping they don't use that actually. It was a great game, but the whole premise sort of (not entirely) contradicts the ending of the entire book series.
Kinda confused by this part as "TW3" takes place after the books.
Fred.
The books end with Geralt and Yennifer dying. Fulfilling the bonded fate in the last wish. They don't explicitly state how they come back to life in the games.
The main way around it, is that ending is a little ambigous in the books, so you can act like they were healed or something, but never says that they actually were, it was meant as a final ending.
In a weird way, it made the show more re-watchable. I felt like I had to rewatch the whole series after it was over in order to be able to piece together whatever the hell was going on.I know that, but they still did it poorly.
The craziest part is she look mad bland in real life. it's like they used actual magic for the show.I mean I sensed she would look decent but goddamn
good for her.I watched that 365 days bullshyt on netflix,the main female lead in that movie looks more like Yennefer than the Yen in the show.
good for her.
too many cacs in the game for my taste anyways, most of the characters in the show are more accurate to the books. especially Triss. The whole theme of the stories was racial discrimination against witcher, elves and dwarves. Seemed kinda ironic that game choose to portray that with nothing but white people representing diversity of all these "races."
Sort of like how x-men used to be a bunch of white people portray the mlk v Malcolm X dynamic they tried to say this and plus magneto and professor x was a statement against racism/