Official Student Debt Cancellation Watch Thread

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,054
Reputation
-13,912
Daps
131,415
Well President Sanders was offering 100% debt cancellation and allowing students to file bankruptcy on student debt.

How much is President Biden offering?
Allowing bankruptcy is nonsensical
Does $10K move the needle for a lot of you guys here?

Just curious.
Read this question again :dahell:

And it’s not just 10k. It’s over 2 years of of no payments and/or your entire payment going to principle

And if you were in default or had any negative marks due to student loans it’s being removed from your credit report
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,670
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
the marketing should be that this is a Middle-Class tax cut



The estimated distributional effects are — how should I put this? — mixed. Under no scenario does more than 12% of the financial benefit accrue to the bottom income quintile. The optimal scenario is (not coincidentally), $10,000 in relief with a $125,000 income cap. That would maximize the combined benefit for the bottom and second income quintiles, shown with bars in the figure (below) for simplicity.



Amusingly (and remember, I’m allowed to laugh at this because I lean Progressive, so I’m effectively laughing at myself), the worst outcome results from no-questions-asked, $50,000 forgiveness. In that scenario, almost 3% of the benefits would go to the top 5% of earners, and 8% to the top 10%. That’s not surprising. Those earning more than $150,000 per year are more likely to have jobs requiring expensive, advanced degrees.

Note that using Penn’s estimate for the year-one cost of $50,000 in relief with no income cap, the 2.43% of benefits which would accrue to borrowers in the top 5% of earners equates to nearly $20 billion.

Crucially (and unfortunately) more than two-thirds of the debt relief accrues to borrowers in the top 60% of the income distribution in all scenarios. The distributional outcome doesn’t change if you control for so-called “lifecycle effects” by limiting the analysis to borrowers aged 25 to 35.
 
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
33,329
Reputation
4,403
Daps
181,263
Reppin
NYC
Allowing bankruptcy is nonsensical

Read this question again :dahell:

And it’s not just 10k. It’s over 2 years of of no payments and/or your entire payment going to principle

And if you were in default or had any negative marks due to student loans it’s being removed from your credit report
Eh…my question was just to gauge how large the average balance (or the spread) is for people on this site

I’m not critical of the plan.
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,054
Reputation
-13,912
Daps
131,415
Eh…my question was just to gauge how large the average balance (or the spread) is for people on this site

I’m not critical of the plan.
Everyone on this site makes more than 125k

Average student loan debt is between 15k & 30k


Almost all the people with high debt balances are lawyers, doctors, professors etc

67638692-76e2-47eb-bb63-19bbf4df4d55-jpeg.32757
 

Consigliere

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
10,532
Reputation
1,836
Daps
37,012
Eh…my question was just to gauge how large the average balance (or the spread) is for people on this site

I’m not critical of the plan.

I make less than $125K and have around $10-12k in student loan debt.

The extra money in my checks since the pandemic started has been cool but it’s not exactly life changing.

I’m not mad at getting a break regardless of the size. We don’t do enough for people in the middle and I know this will help a lot of folks with kids who are on tight budgets.
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,054
Reputation
-13,912
Daps
131,415
the marketing should be that this is a Middle-Class tax cut



The estimated distributional effects are — how should I put this? — mixed. Under no scenario does more than 12% of the financial benefit accrue to the bottom income quintile. The optimal scenario is (not coincidentally), $10,000 in relief with a $125,000 income cap. That would maximize the combined benefit for the bottom and second income quintiles, shown with bars in the figure (below) for simplicity.



Amusingly (and remember, I’m allowed to laugh at this because I lean Progressive, so I’m effectively laughing at myself), the worst outcome results from no-questions-asked, $50,000 forgiveness. In that scenario, almost 3% of the benefits would go to the top 5% of earners, and 8% to the top 10%. That’s not surprising. Those earning more than $150,000 per year are more likely to have jobs requiring expensive, advanced degrees.

Note that using Penn’s estimate for the year-one cost of $50,000 in relief with no income cap, the 2.43% of benefits which would accrue to borrowers in the top 5% of earners equates to nearly $20 billion.

Crucially (and unfortunately) more than two-thirds of the debt relief accrues to borrowers in the top 60% of the income distribution in all scenarios. The distributional outcome doesn’t change if you control for so-called “lifecycle effects” by limiting the analysis to borrowers aged 25 to 35.
Poor people don’t go to college
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,098
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,770
Reppin
CookoutGang
I wonder if there will be a phase out on that threshold. I figure that would play nicer with folks in HCL areas.

Good luck to y'all. I hope you get it. Being debt free is a great feeling.:salute:
 
Top