Official Michael Jordan 'The Last Dance' Doc Thread (NO SPOILERS)

Big Boss

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
175,825
Reputation
12,296
Daps
342,722
Reppin
NULL
:dead:

Do you see the little shyt people are bytching about to call this an "MJ puff piece". They leave out the rodman episode and all hell would break loose.

"Why they actin like jordan workin out all summer was the reason they beat the magic the next year:gucci:? We all know rodman was the missing piece:comeon: He cant even get an episode:martin:?"


You got people bytching about Craig Hodges not being this documentary :dead:
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,726
Reputation
11,653
Daps
370,335
Reppin
CHICAGO
LaBradford Smith yet another 6’3 SG he torched :mjpls:

:mjtf:HE AVERAGED 37 PTS ON 6'7 CLYDE IN THE FINALS.

HERES 41 PTS FROM OLD FLABBY MJ
AGAINST 6'7 SHAWN MARION.




OR 32 PTS AGAINST 6'8 TMAC



OR DROPPING 43 PTS ON
6'7 RICHARD JEFFERSON AT 40 YRS OLD.

:mjlol: YOU fukkING IDIOT
INSINUATING PRIME MJ WOULDNT DESTROY
DEFENDERS OF ANY HEIGHT.



:devil:
:evil:

 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,208
Reputation
8,292
Daps
195,026
Reppin
BX, NYC
:mjtf:HE AVERAGED 37 PTS ON 6'7 CLYDE IN THE FINALS.

HERES 41 PTS FROM OLD FLABBY MJ
AGAINST 6'7 SHAWN MARION.




OR 32 PTS AGAINST 6'8 TMAC



OR DROPPING 43 PTS ON
6'7 RICHARD JEFFERSON AT 40 YRS OLD.

:mjlol: YOU fukkING IDIOT



:devil:
:evil:


Clyde wasn’t a good on-ball defender he was always too upright.

Nobody said he wouldn’t be able to kill bigger defenders just that he would be facing them more consistently in this era and it would make a difference on a night by night basis. Some 40 pieces would be 50 pieces on smaller guys and 40 pieces

And y’all keep on posting these 40 year Jordan games like his efficiency was good in those seasons. Michael can score thats not a question.
 
Last edited:

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,726
Reputation
11,653
Daps
370,335
Reppin
CHICAGO
Clyde wasn’t a good on-ball defender he was always too upright.

Nobody said he wouldn’t be able to kill bigger defenders just that he would be facing them more consistently in this era and it would make a difference on a night by night basis. Some 40 pieces would be 50 pieces on smaller guys and 40 pieces

And y’all keep on posting these 40 year Jordan games like his efficiency was good in those seasons. Michael can score thats not a question.

:gucci:HIS EFFICIENCY WAS GOOD IN THE GAMES POSTED.

HE DIDNT PLAY BALL FOR 3 SEASONS
AND WAS STILL DROPPING 40 PTS ON
BIGGER ATHLETIC DEFENDERS YOUNG ENOUGH TO BE HIS SONS...

THERES NO PLAYER IN THIS LEAGUE
WITH HIS COMBO OF SKILL,
AND ATHLETICISM.


:dead:WE'RE IN A P&R ERA WHERE PPL
LIKE YOUR IDOL HUNTS FOR SWITCHES
AGAINST PGS EVERY GAME
AND YOURE PRETENDING MJ
WOULDNT BE EVEN BETTER
IN THIS OFFENSIVE FRIENDLY ERA
WITH ALL THIS SPACING.
:devil:
:evil:

 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,208
Reputation
8,292
Daps
195,026
Reppin
BX, NYC
:gucci:HIS EFFICIENCY WAS GOOD IN THE GAMES POSTED.

HE DIDNT PLAY BALL FOR 3 SEASONS
AND WAS STILL DROPPING 40 PTS ON
BIGGER ATHLETIC DEFENDERS YOUNG ENOUGH TO BE HIS SONS...

:dead:WE'RE IN A P&R ERA WHERE PPL
LIKE YOUR IDOL HUNTS FOR SWITCHES
AGAINST PGS EVERY GAME
AND YOURE PRETENDING MJ
WOULDNT BE EVEN BETTER
IN THIS OFFENSIVE FRIENDLY ERA
WITH ALL THIS SPACING.
:devil:
:evil:

Some of his most famous games and series were against cacs and 6’3 SG’s playing man to man defenses.

I would like to think consistently facing zone defenses and bigger defenders and better athletes and exerting more energy defensively night in and night out would make a difference in his career.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
10,336
Reputation
1,540
Daps
33,384
:mjtf:HE AVERAGED 37 PTS ON 6'7 CLYDE IN THE FINALS.

HERES 41 PTS FROM OLD FLABBY MJ
AGAINST 6'7 SHAWN MARION.




OR 32 PTS AGAINST 6'8 TMAC



OR DROPPING 43 PTS ON
6'7 RICHARD JEFFERSON AT 40 YRS OLD.

:mjlol: YOU fukkING IDIOT
INSINUATING PRIME MJ WOULDNT DESTROY
DEFENDERS OF ANY HEIGHT.



:devil:
:evil:


people keep downplaying MJ's greatness
they get mad when people say he would average 40 in the modern NBA :mjlit:
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
42,659
Reputation
7,390
Daps
211,748
Clyde wasn’t a good on-ball defender he was always too upright.

Nobody said he wouldn’t be able to kill bigger defenders just that he would be facing them more consistently in this era and it would make a difference on a night by night basis. Some 40 pieces would be 50 pieces on smaller guys and 40 pieces

And y’all keep on posting these 40 year Jordan games like his efficiency was good in those seasons. Michael can score thats not a question.


His efficiency was good in those games Chicago posted :sas2:
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,208
Reputation
8,292
Daps
195,026
Reppin
BX, NYC
His efficiency was good in those games Chicago posted :sas2:
Of course those were his good games.

Tell me why some of his most legendary games feature 6’3 SG’s or cacs defending him?

And do you not think lankier defenders and zone would make no difference to his scoring volume and efficiency?
 

Alexander The Great

I ain't gonna say this sh*t again
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,276
Reputation
7,215
Daps
103,936
:gucci:HIS EFFICIENCY WAS GOOD IN THE GAMES POSTED.

HE DIDNT PLAY BALL FOR 3 SEASONS
AND WAS STILL DROPPING 40 PTS ON
BIGGER ATHLETIC DEFENDERS YOUNG ENOUGH TO BE HIS SONS...

THERES NO PLAYER IN THIS LEAGUE
WITH HIS COMBO OF SKILL,
AND ATHLETICISM.


:dead:WE'RE IN A P&R ERA WHERE PPL
LIKE YOUR IDOL HUNTS FOR SWITCHES
AGAINST PGS EVERY GAME
AND YOURE PRETENDING MJ
WOULDNT BE EVEN BETTER
IN THIS OFFENSIVE FRIENDLY ERA
WITH ALL THIS SPACING.
:devil:
:evil:

Bro you be in these threads doing more make a wish appearances than john cena for these austic weirdos :dead:
 
Top