Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Who gives a fukk.
Official 'JUSTICE LEAGUE' Thread
- Thread starter Lefty Gunz
- Start date
Who gives a fukk.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Every person listed in those "early tweets" is a RT certified critic. But in the end, who cares. People will go see it...or won't.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Actually you can thank people like you who only want to see the "Marvel formula" and hate risks.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
You leave GOATvengers out of this
shyt is dated as fukk. Who has watched The Avengers recently and liked it?
When I saw Ben was casted as Batman I knew this shyt was done....reboot with an older actor breh...shyt is going to be Spiderman status with the reboots.
This fakkit playing Flash looks like he's rocking a Power Rangers cosplay costume.
This fakkit playing Flash looks like he's rocking a Power Rangers cosplay costume.
Bruh, look at this fukking CGI:
LOOK AT DEADPOOL:
THE MERC WITH A MOUTH CAN'T fukkING TALK BRUH
There will be no more praise of this abomination of a movie.
It means its..fun bruh.
I'll take "fun" over "bad". Let's wait for how we feel about it ourselves.
Ben was fukking great as batmanWhen I saw Ben was casted as Batman I knew this shyt was done....reboot with an older actor breh...shyt is going to be Spiderman status with the reboots.
This fakkit playing Flash looks like he's rocking a Power Rangers cosplay costume.
The warehouse scene from bvs is the best batman scene of all time
Anytime someone dismisses Affleck as Batman I immediately disregard them. Trolls are out in full force today.Ben was fukking great as batman
The warehouse scene from bvs is the best batman scene of all time
Breh that's the spyro/big butts/Trubisky rthe goat guy again with another alias.Bruh, look at this fukking CGI:
LOOK AT DEADPOOL:
THE MERC WITH A MOUTH CAN'T fukkING TALK BRUH
There will be no more praise of this abomination of a movie.
It means its..fun bruh.
He will be banned again within a few days.
I genuinely can't think of a movie I would consider placing in my top 50 (which means about a minimum of 100 that would be in the discussion) where one of the first words I would consider using to describe it would be "fun"
Even the ones where if I took the time to think about it I could understand being called that word it would never occur to me to call them that. Take Jurassic Park. Mesmerizing, engrossing, thrilling, wondrous, ground breaking...I could go on. But "fun" doesn't pop in my head like that, even though I obviously enjoyed the experience. When I think "fun" I think amusement park rides, Chuck E Cheese, video games, strip clubs(
). I don't think creative mediums. I don't even think "fun" for comedies. Literally, children movies are the only ones where I get that word being front and center and even then when I think of the greatest children's movies there are other words I would use first. Seeing that word plastered over reviews for a movie just screams to me that the movie has very little to actually provide. Inevitably I find myself left with little to nothing of significance to go back to when it comes to those movies.
Imma go into JL with an open mind doe
Even the ones where if I took the time to think about it I could understand being called that word it would never occur to me to call them that. Take Jurassic Park. Mesmerizing, engrossing, thrilling, wondrous, ground breaking...I could go on. But "fun" doesn't pop in my head like that, even though I obviously enjoyed the experience. When I think "fun" I think amusement park rides, Chuck E Cheese, video games, strip clubs(). I don't think creative mediums. I don't even think "fun" for comedies. Literally, children movies are the only ones where I get that word being front and center and even then when I think of the greatest children's movies there are other words I would use first. Seeing that word plastered over reviews for a movie just screams to me that the movie has very little to actually provide. Inevitably I find myself left with little to nothing of significance to go back to when it comes to those movies.Imma go into JL with an open mind doe
What I find funny is people that get paid to write for a living have such a limited vocabulary that all they can use is the word fun.I genuinely can't think of a movie I would consider placing in my top 50 (which means about a minimum of 100 that would be in the discussion) where one of the first words I would consider using to describe it would be "fun"
Imma go into JL with an open mind doe
It's called a thesaurus.
Hopeofmypeople
Veteran
Actually you can thank people like you who only want to see the "Marvel formula" and hate risks.
I don’t hate risks being taken, so long as they are done well. It’s not my fault Snyder presented us with trash and tried to pass it off as deep. Or are we all meant to accept and praise it because it was different even though it was shyt.
You just paraphrased my rambling perfectly. Like, of all the things you can praise about a movie and all of the words you could use to convey those things, "fun" is all that can come to mind?
It's like your boy telling you he met the woman of his dreams/future mother of his children, you ask him to describe her and he responds "She's bad
" Cool fam, but is that it?
That's why I dismiss modern critics.You just paraphrased my rambling perfectly. Like, of all the things you can praise about a movie and all of the words you could use to convey those things, "fun" is all that can come to mind?
The days of respected people like ebert are gone.
People like to think I'm against "fun" movies, whatever that means but I'm just mocking how low brow and frankly amateur "critics" have become.
I feel like comic book films are graded on some strange scale where all flaws can be forgiven as long as it's "fun."
The moment I saw "not fun" used as a criticism against bvs I was
If you don't like what snyder and goyer did fine,not every movie is for everybody but using a metric that a film isn't trying to aspire to be is the worst kind of critique.
And people joke about "super hero fatigue" but the fastest way to get there is by having all comic book films follow the same formula.
I've long accepted I'm not the average person but I would rather a film swing for the fences and fail then watch a studio bunt out of feat of failing all day.
I've read comics all my life, I don't need the same shyt regurgitated at me like I am a retarded child all day back at me.
But hey,some people like the force awakens
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
I don't know when this started. Maybe it was a backlash against The Dark Knight trilogy? I don't remember anyone saying The Dark Knight was "fun". I think it started probably with Avengers. I don't even remember the first MCU flicks like Iron Man receiving the "fun" label.
Avengers was the Whedon "every hero is a comedian" stuff that worked... once. I think we all loved Avengers when it dropped. The team coming together on the big screen and the team up stuff and a lot of the humor worked.. it was very light hearted, the villains weren't taken seriously..
But now we are a number of years into the MCU and while they produce some gems like Winter Soldier or even Spider-Man Homecoming was solid because the setting actually called for the humor that was present..
"Fun" to critics means "light hearted, comedy, dumb villain, punch lines"...
We knew Justice League would have some of that because it's a team movie and because of th dynamic between the different characters. The question remains, did Justice League go "Full Whedon" or did they go "30% Whedon".
I could deal with 30% Whedon if the rest is Snyder putting in work with the action and visuals. But if it's even close to half-Whedon, then I'm gonna be
Avengers was the Whedon "every hero is a comedian" stuff that worked... once. I think we all loved Avengers when it dropped. The team coming together on the big screen and the team up stuff and a lot of the humor worked.. it was very light hearted, the villains weren't taken seriously..
But now we are a number of years into the MCU and while they produce some gems like Winter Soldier or even Spider-Man Homecoming was solid because the setting actually called for the humor that was present..
"Fun" to critics means "light hearted, comedy, dumb villain, punch lines"...
We knew Justice League would have some of that because it's a team movie and because of th dynamic between the different characters. The question remains, did Justice League go "Full Whedon" or did they go "30% Whedon".
I could deal with 30% Whedon if the rest is Snyder putting in work with the action and visuals. But if it's even close to half-Whedon, then I'm gonna be