Pretty simple. No movie is made or critiqued in a vacuum. So a lot of critics, even those at festivals, started looking at the movie in terms of our current atmosphere and questioned it and wondered if it was being irresponsible or if it has a message that isn’t the best. Not the first time it’s happened in movie history and it won’t be the last. But also that shyt doesn’t matter in the long run.
Movies aren’t objective. There’s no right or wrong to how you judge a movie. You watch the movie, figure how it made you feel, and then analyze why it made you feel that way. And every critic or viewer has their own process for that and also will feel differently about any given movie. Challenging movies are often polarizing. That’s also nothing new. Night if the hunter is the only movie Charles Laughton ever directed. Got terrible reviews at the time and was a bomb in its day. Ruined his career. Now it’s heralded as a classic. The shining and the thing got awful reviews at the time and the thing bombed. Now they’re both seen as two undisputed classics. The thing all three movies ave in common is they’re challenging. They’re not easy to wrap your head around, they don’t give easy answers, and they show a bleak world inhabited by even bleaker people at times.
That’s art and art can be challenging or it can be ant man 2. There’s no right or wrong.
I think that whole art is subjective shyt is a lie and play.
made by people who are not gifted with the ability to actually pencil. Then misappropriating being a penciler or real artist. for buzzwords like painter, musician etc.then coupling misappropriation with absence of reason. then trying to misappropriate what a penciler or real artist can do. For what someone who is incapable of penciling at a high level. Then calling anything lesser skilled than pencilin.
this misappropriated buzzword called art.
which is a fools' foolhearty agent employing absence of reason.
art is not subjective.
can you draw or not makes you an artist.
A painter is not an artist.
he is a painter.
A rapper is not a rapper culturally.
it is a misappropriated teem for someone not an emcee.
Same misappropriation, and absent of reason present in labeling everything art.
just because you paint does not mean you can draw and thus are not an artist.
if you can not draw period.
being able to draw is a god gifted talent.
that is bestowed without reason.
anything after being capable of being able to draw. Is acting with reason because you can not draw at all. Or create real drawings from nature or your mind. that fully and realistically illustrate life in a standard black white medium.
meaning without the aid of the color palette as well.
you are not an artist.
if you do not have this gift period.
this whole art is subjective is a lie.
it is a liar takes or finesse funds.
from someone who is not gifted with ability to pencil.
anyone who can really draw for real on a real self taught master level will tell you the truth about art.
anything else is a liar using component absent of reason.
Art Barr
the only real penciler.
or the only real artist first in this bytch for real.
all the rest of the shyt anyone says is a lie.
Especially someone who can not draw.
to latch on to being an artist. They are a low skill mediocre liar.
if they tell you different . Looking for a payday to be lazy and sell you more of their talentless misappropriated bullshyt.
If you doubt.
we can share artistic professional credits and work and i know you a liar. Or you a talentless classically trained phoney at the end of The day.
y'all listen to liars employing absence of reason.
nit knowing but thinking you are artistically creating this new journey. When you only restepping over misappropriated steps of others.
foolhearted enough to chase the same misforgotten path to poverty.
keep believe'n dese dolts.
Or believe the person.
outside of their real artistic natural talents.
went to work as the best.
where he already made it so.
you could even communicate with someone like minded.
art barr
? Because Arthur is like 40 in this Bruce Wayne was like 10. And when Batman goes at it with Joker isn't he around 40 himself? Like 30 years later.Why would he be fighting a 70 year old Joker?