Adam3000
-
Didn't readSome of you Starkset fellas are legit hilarious. You claim that Jon is a Stark, and in the same breath, you also state that a Stark is the legitimate king of the seven kingdoms. Nevermind the fact that the usurper took the throne by force, which in turn ended the Targaryen succession to the throne (meaning that if a Targ wants to sit on the throne, they'd have to get it back by force). How on earth can Jon be a Stark and claim the iron throne? It's because he is a Targaryen that he can make a claim for it under the previous dynasty. No one refers to the Starks children as Tullys, nor were Jon's half siblings referred to as Martells. Ya'll are adding 1+1 and are coming up with 3.
It's like a person being raised in Canada who then finds out years later that he is truly an American. His Canadian fans want him to run for the presidency of the United States, due to the fact that as a natural born American he qualifies. However, they don't want him to be recognised as an American, and instead want him to continue being a fake Canadian. You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're stating that he has a claim on the throne, then he is a legitimate Targaryen. If you want to keep him as a Stark (since he still signed to you guys), by all means keep him. Just make sure to step aside and not get in the way of the Targaryen that isn't afraid to use her real fukking name.
Word salad