HookersandIceCream
#TeamOrange
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.
The Hounds easily I say
Bronn is talented but the Hound is a beast in every way
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.
Yeh, I'm gonna go with Bronn as well. Physically I'd say they're pretty even. Sandor has size and strength, Bronn has speed and skill. The thing is Sandor doesn't use his head in fights. He just hacks away at his opponents like an angry butcher. Generally that works well against random peons but it's death against a fighter like Bronn, who is not only good enough to hold him off but is also cold and calculated like a snake. See how he rope-a-doped the knight in season 1.Bronn. Too clever, too sneaky and underhanded. Dude will do whatever it takes, and he's quicker.
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.
They both are. To be honest I've been involved in this debate heavily on other forums. I can accept people thinking Sandor would win. It's reasonable.Hard to say. You guys are hyping up Bronn while ignoring that Clegane is one of the best fighters in Westeros. I actually have to use a spoiler here for some evidence:
Bronn is a natural though, and logically he would have seen a lot more action that Sandor because he was a mercenary. I don't think Sandor saw much action or fought in any battles or wars besides the Blackwater. He was Joffrey's bodyguard and Cersei's before that. That job was mostly laying on his ass, as I don't think many people were attacking the queen or crown prince.He also has a knight's training in combat, which Bronn doesn't have.
Yeh, I'm gonna go with Bronn as well. Physically I'd say they're pretty even. Sandor has size and strength, Bronn has speed and skill. The thing is Sandor doesn't use his head in fights. He just hacks away at his opponents like an angry butcher. Generally that works well against random peons but it's death against a fighter like Bronn, who is not only good enough to hold him off but is also cold and calculated like a snake. See how he rope-a-doped the knight in season 1.
Damn good fight though. Whoever wins, wins by the length of a bee's dikk.
Well he sort of did, and he sort of didn't. Beric Dondarrion's sword broke right at the end. If not he would have had the Hound.
Bronn is a natural though, and logically he would have seen a lot more action that Sandor because he was a mercenary. I don't think Sandor saw much action or fought in any battles or wars besides the Blackwater. He was Joffrey's bodyguard and Cersei's before that. That job was mostly laying on his ass, as I don't think many people were attacking the queen or crown prince.
Sandor had a knight's training but fighting in the practice yard has its limits, and doesn't compare to real combat.
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.
He also has a knight's training in combat, which Bronn doesn't have.
Fair enough, but even a stalemate in that instance is a serious accomplishment, especially when you consider that he was terrified of fire, hungover, slower (as he would be against Bronn,) and facing the shock of an undead man with a magic sword, which is something he's never seen before.
Sandor may have fought fewer battles (I'm not actually sure about this,) but we don't know Bronn's past, either. Clearly he's a skilled fighter, and so presumably has a good deal of experience, but also have no reason to assume any vast gulf between his experience and Sandor's. I also think you're discounting what knight's training can do. Another spoiler section as evidence:
Think of the distinction between a modern martial artist who has trained for 10 years with full-contact sparring, but never been in a life or death fight, vs. an untrained man who has fought for his life on several occasions over that same span of time. There's a lot to consider...If you've read book 5 (and if you haven't, I'll try and keep it free of specifics,) recall Barristan's discussion of the differences between Mereen's feared pit fighters and a knight. Though the pit fighters fight for their lives every time there is a game, and thus have much more experience and are unencumbered by honor or fidelity to any particular technique, he still rates them much lower than knights specifically because of their lack of training, and furthermore, he proves the distinction later on. In other words, knights' training counts for a great deal, even if it isn't in real-life combat situations.
It also seems to me like since Sandor detests knighthood, he wouldn't fight like a knight (with the honor-based restrictions and regulations of combat,) so he possesses all the skills of a knight, but doesn't limit himself to them.