Official 'Game Of Thrones' Season 2 Discussion Thread *NO BOOK SPOILERS*

iamduval

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
23,352
Reputation
1,320
Daps
57,631
Reppin
NULL
they would both kill each other. I dont think either one walks away from that fight
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,941
Bronn. Too clever, too sneaky and underhanded. Dude will do whatever it takes, and he's quicker.:smugfavre:
Yeh, I'm gonna go with Bronn as well. Physically I'd say they're pretty even. Sandor has size and strength, Bronn has speed and skill. The thing is Sandor doesn't use his head in fights. He just hacks away at his opponents like an angry butcher. Generally that works well against random peons but it's death against a fighter like Bronn, who is not only good enough to hold him off but is also cold and calculated like a snake. See how he rope-a-doped the knight in season 1.

Damn good fight though. Whoever wins, wins by the length of a bee's dikk.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.

Hard to say. You guys are hyping up Bronn while ignoring that Clegane is one of the best fighters in Westeros. I actually have to use a spoiler here for some evidence:

He defeated Lord Beric, who was faster, had the shock factor of being undead, and a flaming sword that tapped into the hound's greatest fear.

He also has a knight's training in combat, which Bronn doesn't have.
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,941
Hard to say. You guys are hyping up Bronn while ignoring that Clegane is one of the best fighters in Westeros. I actually have to use a spoiler here for some evidence:
They both are. To be honest I've been involved in this debate heavily on other forums. I can accept people thinking Sandor would win. It's reasonable.
What pisses me off is when people say one or the other would win by a large margin. These are two of the best fighters in the series. Whoever wins you can be damn sure he wins by the skin of his nuts.
He defeated Lord Beric, who was faster, had the shock factor of being undead, and a flaming sword that tapped into the hound's greatest fear.
Well he sort of did, and he sort of didn't. Beric Dondarrion's sword broke right at the end. If not he would have had the Hound.
He also has a knight's training in combat, which Bronn doesn't have.
Bronn is a natural though, and logically he would have seen a lot more action that Sandor because he was a mercenary. I don't think Sandor saw much action or fought in any battles or wars besides the Blackwater. He was Joffrey's bodyguard and Cersei's before that. That job was mostly laying on his ass, as I don't think many people were attacking the queen or crown prince.
Sandor had a knight's training but fighting in the practice yard has its limits, and doesn't compare to real combat.
 

MidniteJay

無敵
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
24,520
Reputation
5,678
Daps
65,187
Yeh, I'm gonna go with Bronn as well. Physically I'd say they're pretty even. Sandor has size and strength, Bronn has speed and skill. The thing is Sandor doesn't use his head in fights. He just hacks away at his opponents like an angry butcher. Generally that works well against random peons but it's death against a fighter like Bronn, who is not only good enough to hold him off but is also cold and calculated like a snake. See how he rope-a-doped the knight in season 1.

Damn good fight though. Whoever wins, wins by the length of a bee's dikk.

I know said I would cease posting in this thread but I just wanted to put in my piece on the matter.

Concerning the bold, it seems you forgot the fight he had with his older brother, Mountain last season during the tourney.

Mountain seems to fight like a berserker but Sandor is able to go toe-to-toe with him blocking and deflecting the Mountain's strikes using finesse. He even evades a slice that could have taken his head off when Robert yells for them to stop.
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,941
Yeah I remember that. There was a bit more to that scene that meets the eye. It was basically the only time he showed restraint in a fight and the reason is a bit more evident in the books.

Sandor's whole deal is about exposing the hypocrisy behind the knight system and chivalry. He knows that knights are killers just like everyone else so why are there these romantic notions about them. How I understood that scene is that Sandor restraining himself is basically his way of saying "look you morons, this barbarian is one of the 'noble' knights you talk about so much". He was throwing it in everybody's face how the supposedly 'noble' knight acted like a savage while the scarred monster showed restraint.

At least that's my interpretation...
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,724
Reppin
NYC
Well he sort of did, and he sort of didn't. Beric Dondarrion's sword broke right at the end. If not he would have had the Hound.

Fair enough, but even a stalemate in that instance is a serious accomplishment, especially when you consider that he was terrified of fire, hungover, slower (as he would be against Bronn,) and facing the shock of an undead man with a magic sword, which is something he's never seen before.

Bronn is a natural though, and logically he would have seen a lot more action that Sandor because he was a mercenary. I don't think Sandor saw much action or fought in any battles or wars besides the Blackwater. He was Joffrey's bodyguard and Cersei's before that. That job was mostly laying on his ass, as I don't think many people were attacking the queen or crown prince.

Sandor had a knight's training but fighting in the practice yard has its limits, and doesn't compare to real combat.

Sandor may have fought fewer battles (I'm not actually sure about this,) but we don't know Bronn's past, either. Clearly he's a skilled fighter, and so presumably has a good deal of experience, but also have no reason to assume any vast gulf between his experience and Sandor's. I also think you're discounting what knight's training can do. Another spoiler section as evidence:

If you've read book 5 (and if you haven't, I'll try and keep it free of specifics,) recall Barristan's discussion of the differences between Mereen's feared pit fighters and a knight. Though the pit fighters fight for their lives every time there is a game, and thus have much more experience and are unencumbered by honor or fidelity to any particular technique, he still rates them much lower than knights specifically because of their lack of training, and furthermore, he proves the distinction later on. In other words, knights' training counts for a great deal, even if it isn't in real-life combat situations.
Think of the distinction between a modern martial artist who has trained for 10 years with full-contact sparring, but never been in a life or death fight, vs. an untrained man who has fought for his life on several occasions over that same span of time. There's a lot to consider...

It also seems to me like since Sandor detests knighthood, he wouldn't fight like a knight (with the honor-based restrictions and regulations of combat,) so he possesses all the skills of a knight, but doesn't limit himself to them.
 

NaiSim

HEAR ME ROAR!
Supporter
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
378
Reputation
30
Daps
252
Reppin
nj
Bronn vs the Hound. Trial by battle. Both armed and armored as they see fit. Discuss.

Tough call. Bronn doesn't fight in Armor so I'd give the edge to the Hound, dude is young and ferocious. Ser Vardis Egan was an oldtimer.


He also has a knight's training in combat, which Bronn doesn't have.

You're giving too much credit to the knightly training. A lot of it is stance, horseback riding and lancing. Swordplay is just part of it.

Fair enough, but even a stalemate in that instance is a serious accomplishment, especially when you consider that he was terrified of fire, hungover, slower (as he would be against Bronn,) and facing the shock of an undead man with a magic sword, which is something he's never seen before.



Sandor may have fought fewer battles (I'm not actually sure about this,) but we don't know Bronn's past, either. Clearly he's a skilled fighter, and so presumably has a good deal of experience, but also have no reason to assume any vast gulf between his experience and Sandor's. I also think you're discounting what knight's training can do. Another spoiler section as evidence:

If you've read book 5 (and if you haven't, I'll try and keep it free of specifics,) recall Barristan's discussion of the differences between Mereen's feared pit fighters and a knight. Though the pit fighters fight for their lives every time there is a game, and thus have much more experience and are unencumbered by honor or fidelity to any particular technique, he still rates them much lower than knights specifically because of their lack of training, and furthermore, he proves the distinction later on. In other words, knights' training counts for a great deal, even if it isn't in real-life combat situations.
Think of the distinction between a modern martial artist who has trained for 10 years with full-contact sparring, but never been in a life or death fight, vs. an untrained man who has fought for his life on several occasions over that same span of time. There's a lot to consider...

It also seems to me like since Sandor detests knighthood, he wouldn't fight like a knight (with the honor-based restrictions and regulations of combat,) so he possesses all the skills of a knight, but doesn't limit himself to them.
Barristan is not a credible source. He's a knight through and through and is biased towards his own. The Pit fighter didn't know how to fight a man in armor, that was his problem. Bronn doesn't have that problem.
 

jackswstd

Retired
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,913
Reputation
8,890
Daps
264,853
Reppin
Chicago
gameofthroneshousesinfo.png
Just in case it gives away anything.
 

Yessir_Araphat

takin money>>gettin money
Supporter
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
5,223
Reputation
1,235
Daps
24,877
Reppin
N/S Long Beach
Maybe I missed it, but does the show ever explain how some wildlings got south of the wall?? Book brehs, if its a spoiler, then nevermind
 

Microfracture

Real G's move in silence
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
6,052
Reputation
820
Daps
12,649
Reppin
Knees
I'd have to say the Hound would win by a small margin.

When Tyrion asks Bronn to fight for him against the Mountain, Bronn basically says hell no. To me that indicates he doesn't think he could win. Going off the evidence we have, the Cleganes are pretty even as fighters so it might be that the Hound would win. As far as differences from the book and the show, I'd still say Bron would lose either way.
 
Top