Talk being the operative word.
When they actually showed him fight, he, in his prime, fought to a draw against a Ned Stark who was way out of his prime and was not that great to begin with. You want us to ignore that Jamie couldn't best a mediocre fighter who got old? Compare how your #1 made a prime Ned look to how your false #2 made an old Ned look, then try to tell me Show Jamie is number 2 DOA.
I don't care about Jaime cutting down a bunch of no names or striking fear in a green Robb Stark. Show Jamie is just an illusion created by a fancy name and a knack for choosing his opponents wisely....they've said that explicitly.
There's no justification for putting Jamie over the likes of Oberyn, Jorah, The Hound, Bronn, even Brienne all who have better quality W's without draws against lesser, older, fatter opponents. Face it, breh, you've been bamboozled...hoodwinked into believing Jamie was an all time great. He's not. If he were they would've written down his great deeds in that book next to Daynes. Where's his deeds, son? Where's his deeds? WHERE THE fukk ARE HIS DEEDS!?!?