wtfyomom

All Star
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
7,704
Reputation
-757
Daps
11,438
Reppin
NULL
Brooks had a british guy maybe a year and a half ago, talking about italian politics and he had recently written in jacobin an article called "Italy is the future" and he was saying for the longest it was thew christian democrats vs the communist party but once the communist party split up, it also caused the christian dems to fold cause they were essentially co dependent in their opposition. and it led to kind of this open free for all

recently nomiki konst was on fox and kennedy asked her, what happens if sanders gets a plurality but not the nom, and nomiki said, the dem party will be over, but so will the republicans because they are co dependent . and i thought back to that article.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
74,026
Reputation
8,612
Daps
222,796
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
So people are afraid of Bernie becoming like George McGovern? Did they even have anything of the equilvalent of BernieBros in McGovern's time?

McGovern is a lazy comparison by people cause Nixon had 60% approval and was beating McGovern by 15 points in polls going to 1971.

Chris Hedges is talking about the Dem establishment and corporate media having a mask off approach to Bernie if he is the nominee. They'd prefer to give favorable coverage to Trump...

I could see that happening... but not sure
 

Rice N Beans

Junior Hayley Stan
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,064
Reputation
1,625
Daps
22,913
Reppin
Chicago, IL
Brooks had a british guy maybe a year and a half ago, talking about italian politics and he had recently written in jacobin an article called "Italy is the future" and he was saying for the longest it was thew christian democrats vs the communist party but once the communist party split up, it also caused the christian dems to fold cause they were essentially co dependent in their opposition. and it led to kind of this open free for all

recently nomiki konst was on fox and kennedy asked her, what happens if sanders gets a plurality but not the nom, and nomiki said, the dem party will be over, but so will the republicans because they are co dependent . and i thought back to that article.

The GOP is too tied in to certain states. No way they collapse in my opinion.
 

ThirdAct

Superstar
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Messages
8,348
Reputation
2,109
Daps
39,511
I think the whole narrative about Bernie bros is that the establishment cant stand the fact that they're active in the political scene; the MSM and pundits cant spew bullshyt without being called out for it

What people don't realize is that the so-called Bernie Bros are one of the main reasons why Bernie is single-handedly the best candidate to beat Trump. If anyone is going to sway angry voters away from Trump, it's Bernie.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
74,026
Reputation
8,612
Daps
222,796
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC


:obama: Parts about Bernie
ehqsuVL.png
full
:
:

The truth of Obama’s silence on the 2020 primary is that it’s not just about his obvious wish to stay out of the spotlight, but it also reflects a choreographed strategy. With the race looking more and more likely to grow bitter and messy, and maybe even wind up in a contested convention, the former president and those around him are increasingly sure he will need to play a prominent role in bringing the party back together and calming its tensions later this summer, including perhaps in Milwaukee, where the party’s meeting is scheduled to be held in July. So he is committed to not allowing his personal thoughts to dribble out in the meantime, directly or via leaks, conscious of how any sense that he’s taking sides in intraparty disputes could rock the primary in the short run and potentially undermine his ability to play this larger role in the months ahead. “He says one sentence about being woke at some conference, and the Twitterverse freaks out,” recalled one of his friends, referring to the former president’s comments at an Obama Foundation meeting in Chicago that set off a firestorm. He and his advisors “are very aware [of the effect of] one word that Barack Obama says.” And he’s being careful to ensure he can be seen as an honest broker in June and July — a potentially necessary designation given both his status as the party’s most popular figure and the real possibility that Sanders, or another candidate, could enter the summer with a plurality of the delegates needed for the nomination but not an outright victory. “Obama is going to look at the [delegate math to determine] the outcome. If the math brings someone [to the nomination], he’ll back it in full,” one person who still speaks with the former president told me recently. “His biggest dilemma is if Bernie is at 35-40 [percent of the delegates], and no one else is [at] 20. Does he say, ‘You have to go with who won [a plurality of] the delegates, and who looks to be the true front-runner?’”

But Obama is hardly the only Democrat sweating that particular possibility, especially with Michael Bloomberg — who some in Obama’s orbit favor but many regard warily — poised to swoop in on the process in March. Sorting out that confusion might be the most complicated scenario for Obama, the person added. The reality might be more simple: “It’s not gonna happen before the convention, [but] he’s gonna be all-in for Bernie if he’s the nominee.”

While he’s following the race by reading newspaper reports, he’s been disengaged with its day-to-day dynamics, sure that he’ll have to catch up on them later this year anyway — he doesn’t even make a point of watching the debates. Obama has insisted that he’ll support Democrats’ nominee, no matter who it is, publicly saying so as recently as November. Privately, he reminds friends that the views of the candidate — even if it’s Sanders, whose democratic socialism is a significant break from Obama’s technocratic progressivism — will more closely reflect not just his values, but Democrats’ and the nations’, than Trump’s. He often adds that he expects to campaign often and loudly in the general election, even if he has to step in to try and unite liberals, moderates, and progressives beforehand.

Until then, Obama has reminded those who ask, he won’t speak up unless he feels compelled to make any specific, candidate-neutral points to ensure Democrats win in November. “There is no way Barack Obama is intervening, unless something very strange happens,” said a friend who’s heard his reasoning. “He just doesn’t have that in him.” Even if he felt like speaking out against Sanders specifically, he knows such a statement would likely ruin his standing on the left and almost certainly divide the party just when it needs uniting, according to multiple people who’ve spoken with him about the race. Obama and those around him “have a very clear understanding that if they put their finger on the scale right now, all of a sudden half of the Democratic Party hates him,” an influential Democrat who keeps in touch with Obama explained.

Anyway, Obama’s team has made clear to Sanders’ inner circle that the former president has no intention of getting involved in the primary. And people from both camps who are familiar with the discussions say the pair has also spoken directly during this election cycle. Top Sanders advisors accordingly viewed the Fox Business report as a case of rogue former Obama aides speaking wishfully and out of turn, rather than a preview of things to come. (The Democratic establishment backlash will be fierce if Sanders starts running away with the nomination, they’re sure, but it won’t come from the ex-president.) The Sanders camp also takes reassurance from 2016, when Obama easily could have spoken up for Hillary Clinton — his chosen candidate — during the rougher parts of the primary, but was careful not to. When Obama finally spoke with Sanders about his impending exit from the race in the summer of 2016, according to multiple Democrats briefed on the private conversation, it was only after it was clear that Clinton would be the nominee. He talked about delegate math and thanked Sanders for bringing new voters into the process but did not share any judgments on the candidate’s ideology or offer his own differing views of the party’s shape or the electorate’s preferences.

None of this is to say Obama and Sanders suddenly see eye-to-eye on what the party’s larger priorities should be. In private these days, Obama doesn’t say he’s bothered by Sanders himself, but he still talks about the need to balance pragmatism with idealism, and he remains wary of Sanders’s tactics and the political style of his wing of the party, according to multiple people who’ve talked politics with him in recent months. (This poked into plain view in November, when Obama said: “This is still a country that is less revolutionary than it is interested in improvement. They like seeing things improved, but the average American doesn’t think we have to completely tear down the system and remake it.” He never used Sanders’, or any candidates’, name, but the point landed. “Voters, including Democrats, are not driven by the same views that are reflected on certain left-leaning Twitter feeds, or the activist wing of our party,” he continued. “And that’s not a criticism to the activist wing — their job is to poke and prod and text and inspire, and motivate. But the candidate’s job, whoever that ends up being, is to get elected.”)

Still, Obama is always careful to make sure people he’s talking with don’t get the impression he would try and stop Sanders from getting elected, and he even offered some of the senator’s signature policies oblique praise in his first major political speech post-presidency. “Democrats aren’t just running on good old ideas like a higher minimum wage, but they’re running on new ideas like Medicare for All, giving workers seats on corporate boards, reversing the most egregious tax cuts to make sure college students graduate debt free,” he said at the University of Illinois in September of 2018. And Obama has, at times, found Sanders to be a reasonable politician, even when they disagree: in 2016, the then-president asked the senator not to make his anti-Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement stance an issue on the floor of the national convention in Philadelphia, according to multiple Democrats clued in on the discussion. Sanders agreed.


 

wtfyomom

All Star
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
7,704
Reputation
-757
Daps
11,438
Reppin
NULL
it may or may not happen. stranger things have happened before. party realignments, even trump and now possibly sanders taking over the two parties is smthg we never thought wed see. you can make a case, trump, sanders and bloomberg are all independents. things can change on a dime.
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
82,247
Reputation
11,926
Daps
222,576
McGovern is a lazy comparison by people cause Nixon had 60% approval and was beating McGovern by 15 points in polls going to 1971.

Chris Hedges is talking about the Dem establishment and corporate media having a mask off approach to Bernie if he is the nominee. They'd prefer to give favorable coverage to Trump...

I could see that happening... but not sure

They better not go after Bernie when he gets nominated. He leads all the states for Super Tuesday and gonna be the clear winner. Obama is smart enough not to play in MSNBC politics and stand behind him as the clear winner, for the sake of keeping the Democratic party united as well as winning back the government AND solidifying his legacy
 
Top