An SC win for Biden can shift numbers and money. Don't count grandpa Joe out yet.Watch MSNBC, CNN, WaPo, etc. call Biden winning SC a gamechanger and declare it a whole new race for 3 days.
STFU, you always write a whole lot of nothing.I don't like too many choices. I'm ok with 3 or 4 candidates tops.
I feel like Amy, Steyer and Pete and eventually the Republican plant Bloomberg are all taking votes away from Biden. Don't like it one bit.
Get off my dikk. I don't give a fukk what any of you clowns think. Oh I'm sorry let me be like everyone else in this echo chamber shythole and post what everyone universally agrees on for the sake of daps and being in the "in club".STFU, you always write a whole lot of nothing.
shyt nikka if Bernie wins SC gon ahead and ban me tooIf Bernie wins ban me
ain’t seen you this mad brehSTFU, you always write a whole lot of nothing.
An SC win for Biden can shift numbers and money. Don't count grandpa Joe out yet.
i think that perez didnt nip it in the bud early enough we dont really ever need 20 candidates on a fukkin debate stage when only one is gonna end up being the nomineeThe issue being that no matter who you want to win, all those candidates means the delegates are getting split up and makes a contested convention more likely.
Perez has proven himself to be pretty incompetent.i think that perez didnt nip it in the bud early enough we dont really ever need 20 candidates on a fukkin debate stage when only one is gonna end up being the nominee
unless the democrats change it to a pure winner takes all, which theyll never do for the same reason the electoral college exists
i think that perez didnt nip it in the bud early enough we dont really ever need 20 candidates on a fukkin debate stage when only one is gonna end up being the nominee
unless the democrats change it to a pure winner takes all, which theyll never do for the same reason the electoral college exists
as someone who supports the popular vote, i cant say i agreeI don't like winner-take-all because it becomes so arbitrary, someone wins by 1% and they get all the delegates. But it does seem like they should move to a system that weights the delegates more heavily towards the frontrunner. Honestly I wouldn't mind if the delegates themselves were deciding the case - if 10% of voters wanted to support an underdog and that gives that underdog a bit of power at the convention, that would be fine. The only reason it's an issue for me is because of the stupid superdelegates getting to step in.