What pundits? Please provide what ur talking about.
First you said Medicare for all pays for everything. I proved that was a lie.
Then you said Medicare offers more than commercial insurance plans. I proved that was a lie.
Then you said Canada had universal coverage. They do, but not 100% full coverage. Again another lie.
Now your saying Canadian pundits say our proposed system is better than they ones they have.
Is this another lie sir? You keep juelzing until you can find something that sticks. Why anyone would dap your posts when u obviously have zero idea what ur talking about is crazy.
Every synopsis “pie in the sky” plan you say we’re getting is wrong.
Why is it so hard for u to admit you just dk what you’re talking about or how all of this works?![]()
I never mentioned Canadian coverage until my last post. You kept bringing them up to make the claim that Medicare for all would have the same limitations in order to claim that it would be worse than private insurance. You continue to compare current Medicare coverage to the supplemental plans that people enroll in to cover the current gaps. You never directly address what is covered in the bill other than to say that the phrase "medically necessary" means that people will left without coverage without actually showing that people are currently being covered for these things under private insurance. You keep dodging the fact that people are being denied coverage under private insurance plans currently and aren't addressing how that could be fixed.
You claim you proved things that you haven't.